Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Identity Politics is a strong signal for us to fight back from being dragged into an Ontario - Quebec feud that has its roots in the 1759 battle on the Plains of Abraham


'We have fewer rights': Franco-Ontarian youth protest by living proudly.  At a French improv tournament, students criticize Doug Ford's cutbacks in services
Jaela Bernstien ~~ CBC News ~~ Dec 07, 2018

In Prescott-Russell county, about 500 kilometres east of Queen's Park, signs of  pride colour the countryside. In most towns, the Ontario flag is flown next to its green-and-white Franco-Ontarian counterpart, decorated with both the fleur-de-lis and trillium.

This is the riding of Amanda Simard, who left her own party in protest of Premier Doug Ford's cuts to French services. And while the government has made attempts at concessions since then, it's done little to quell the fury among these French-speaking communities….

CLICK HERE for the full story:


Let’s get a couple of things straight:

  1. there is no such thing as a Franco-Ontarian. We are all Canadians. If you reside in Ontario, you can describe yourself as an Ontarian. Describing yourself as English-Ontarian, Franco-Ontarian, German-Ontarian, Mandarin-Ontarian or Yiddish-Ontarian is identity politics 
  2. our constitution requires that we will provide services in both English and French language in our parliament, provincial legislatures and courts 
  3. the Charter section on Official Languages sets out where and how minority language services will be provided


In 1840, the British Parliament created the Province of Canada consisting of what is now Ontario (Upper Canada) and Quebec (Lower Canada) with equal political representation for each. Resulting from that, the Province was ungovernable from 1840 until confederation, a quarter century later.


Representatives from the two political identities could not agree - on anything. No political party could find enough support from both groups to create a working majority government. Elections were held in 1841, 1844, 1848, 1851, 1854, 1858, 1861 and 1863. The deadlock was finally broken with the 1867 confederation of four provinces. However, the fierce rivalry between Ontario and Quebec continued.

The Official Languages Act (OLA) was passed into law in 1969, 102 years after confederation, and is an enormously expensive accommodation to the French speaking population, estimated at over $2.4 billion annually (2006-07 figures for combine provinces and federal government spending).  Ontario spent the largest share estimated at over $623 million or $1,275 for each minority member. Quebec, in comparison, spent $50.5 million annually or $85 for each minority member.

What is frightening is that these figures are now 12 years out of date. Costs will have risen substantially over more than a decade. Using a modest 2% annual increase in costs, they would exceed $3 billion today.

Battle on the Plains of Abraham
Every taxpayer, irrespective of native language, or ethnicity, is dragged into paying a portion of this subsidy to French speaking people living outside Quebec. The vocal minority in Ontario, screaming that they have a right to subsidies from non-French taxpayers, is a strong signal for us to fight back from being dragged into an Ontario - Quebec feud that has its roots in the 1759 Battle on the Plains of Abraham

Despite substantial concessions to the French speaking population in the 1774 Quebec Act, the feud rages on.

The Official Languages Act must be repealed and replaced with legislation that provides for French language services in accordance with Sections 16 through 22 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There is nothing therein that prevents provision of minority language services through qualified translators. The notion that government officials and employees must be bilingual is nonsense. Our civil service must be populated based on competence, not language.

We forget that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms exists to protect us from our governments. The opening paragraph of the Charter reads:

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

The Official Languages Act cannot be construed as demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. The French language is solidly protected under our constitution. The Official Languages Act overrides the equality rights of non-French citizens and cannot stand as written.

Since there is no such thing as ‘enough’ in this feud, it is time for English speaking people to declare the level of subsidy they are willing to accept … and pay for. The constitution (which embodies the charter) spells out the terms and they must be adhered to.

Language is not a tool to promote French use in English Canada.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nurses Take Job Action After Years of NDP Neglect

Image Credit:  BC Nurses Union BC nurses have reached a breaking point after years of unsafe conditions, rising violence in the workplace and a government that wouldn’t listen. Now they are on the picket line fighting to be heard. Last week, nurses began job action with a 72-hour strike notice, refusing non-essential overtime and stepping back from non-nursing duties. As of Tuesday, they have escalated to picket lines for the first time in decades. This moment was avoidable. It is the result of years of unanswered concerns from the frontline workers who keep our hospitals running. Nurses have been raising the same concerns for years: unsafe staffing levels, rising violence on the job, and a workload no single person should have to carry. None of it is new, and none of it should have taken a strike vote to get the government's attention. "Nurses are exercising their legal right to job action, but it shouldn’t have had to come to this," said Kiel Giddens, MLA for...

British Columbians Still Don’t Know Who’s Paying for NDP’s BC Hydro Deal

The NDP is making billion-dollar promises with BC Hydro, but British Columbians still don’t know who will pay the bill. Last week’s memorandum of understanding isn’t what the federal government and the NDP are making it out to be. It’s an admission that the NDP failed to make the long-term investments needed to keep B.C. powered. Now British Columbians have serious questions about the cost and whether BC Hydro ratepayers will end up paying the price. David L. Williams, MLA for Salmon Arm-Shuswap and Shadow Minister for BC Hydro and Electrical Energy Development , said British Columbians deserve clear answers about the full implications of the Canada–British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement. “British Columbians deserve the full truth,” said Mr. Williams. “This multi-billion-dollar announcement does not answer who pays for cost overruns, who pays for new generation, who carries the risk if industrial customers do not materialize, or whether ratepayers will be forced ...

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...

Labels

Show more