Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Identity Politics is a strong signal for us to fight back from being dragged into an Ontario - Quebec feud that has its roots in the 1759 battle on the Plains of Abraham


'We have fewer rights': Franco-Ontarian youth protest by living proudly.  At a French improv tournament, students criticize Doug Ford's cutbacks in services
Jaela Bernstien ~~ CBC News ~~ Dec 07, 2018

In Prescott-Russell county, about 500 kilometres east of Queen's Park, signs of  pride colour the countryside. In most towns, the Ontario flag is flown next to its green-and-white Franco-Ontarian counterpart, decorated with both the fleur-de-lis and trillium.

This is the riding of Amanda Simard, who left her own party in protest of Premier Doug Ford's cuts to French services. And while the government has made attempts at concessions since then, it's done little to quell the fury among these French-speaking communities….

CLICK HERE for the full story:


Let’s get a couple of things straight:

  1. there is no such thing as a Franco-Ontarian. We are all Canadians. If you reside in Ontario, you can describe yourself as an Ontarian. Describing yourself as English-Ontarian, Franco-Ontarian, German-Ontarian, Mandarin-Ontarian or Yiddish-Ontarian is identity politics 
  2. our constitution requires that we will provide services in both English and French language in our parliament, provincial legislatures and courts 
  3. the Charter section on Official Languages sets out where and how minority language services will be provided


In 1840, the British Parliament created the Province of Canada consisting of what is now Ontario (Upper Canada) and Quebec (Lower Canada) with equal political representation for each. Resulting from that, the Province was ungovernable from 1840 until confederation, a quarter century later.


Representatives from the two political identities could not agree - on anything. No political party could find enough support from both groups to create a working majority government. Elections were held in 1841, 1844, 1848, 1851, 1854, 1858, 1861 and 1863. The deadlock was finally broken with the 1867 confederation of four provinces. However, the fierce rivalry between Ontario and Quebec continued.

The Official Languages Act (OLA) was passed into law in 1969, 102 years after confederation, and is an enormously expensive accommodation to the French speaking population, estimated at over $2.4 billion annually (2006-07 figures for combine provinces and federal government spending).  Ontario spent the largest share estimated at over $623 million or $1,275 for each minority member. Quebec, in comparison, spent $50.5 million annually or $85 for each minority member.

What is frightening is that these figures are now 12 years out of date. Costs will have risen substantially over more than a decade. Using a modest 2% annual increase in costs, they would exceed $3 billion today.

Battle on the Plains of Abraham
Every taxpayer, irrespective of native language, or ethnicity, is dragged into paying a portion of this subsidy to French speaking people living outside Quebec. The vocal minority in Ontario, screaming that they have a right to subsidies from non-French taxpayers, is a strong signal for us to fight back from being dragged into an Ontario - Quebec feud that has its roots in the 1759 Battle on the Plains of Abraham. 

Despite substantial concessions to the French speaking population in the 1774 Quebec Act, the feud rages on.

The Official Languages Act must be repealed and replaced with legislation that provides for French language services in accordance with Sections 16 through 22 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There is nothing therein that prevents provision of minority language services through qualified translators. The notion that government officials and employees must be bilingual is nonsense. Our civil service must be populated based on competence, not language.

We forget that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms exists to protect us from our governments. The opening paragraph of the Charter reads:

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

The Official Languages Act cannot be construed as demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. The French language is solidly protected under our constitution. The Official Languages Act overrides the equality rights of non-French citizens and cannot stand as written.

Since there is no such thing as ‘enough’ in this feud, it is time for English speaking people to declare the level of subsidy they are willing to accept … and pay for. The constitution (which embodies the charter) spells out the terms and they must be adhered to.

Language is not a tool to promote French use in English Canada.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more