Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Identity Politics is a strong signal for us to fight back from being dragged into an Ontario - Quebec feud that has its roots in the 1759 battle on the Plains of Abraham


'We have fewer rights': Franco-Ontarian youth protest by living proudly.  At a French improv tournament, students criticize Doug Ford's cutbacks in services
Jaela Bernstien ~~ CBC News ~~ Dec 07, 2018

In Prescott-Russell county, about 500 kilometres east of Queen's Park, signs of  pride colour the countryside. In most towns, the Ontario flag is flown next to its green-and-white Franco-Ontarian counterpart, decorated with both the fleur-de-lis and trillium.

This is the riding of Amanda Simard, who left her own party in protest of Premier Doug Ford's cuts to French services. And while the government has made attempts at concessions since then, it's done little to quell the fury among these French-speaking communities….

CLICK HERE for the full story:


Let’s get a couple of things straight:

  1. there is no such thing as a Franco-Ontarian. We are all Canadians. If you reside in Ontario, you can describe yourself as an Ontarian. Describing yourself as English-Ontarian, Franco-Ontarian, German-Ontarian, Mandarin-Ontarian or Yiddish-Ontarian is identity politics 
  2. our constitution requires that we will provide services in both English and French language in our parliament, provincial legislatures and courts 
  3. the Charter section on Official Languages sets out where and how minority language services will be provided


In 1840, the British Parliament created the Province of Canada consisting of what is now Ontario (Upper Canada) and Quebec (Lower Canada) with equal political representation for each. Resulting from that, the Province was ungovernable from 1840 until confederation, a quarter century later.


Representatives from the two political identities could not agree - on anything. No political party could find enough support from both groups to create a working majority government. Elections were held in 1841, 1844, 1848, 1851, 1854, 1858, 1861 and 1863. The deadlock was finally broken with the 1867 confederation of four provinces. However, the fierce rivalry between Ontario and Quebec continued.

The Official Languages Act (OLA) was passed into law in 1969, 102 years after confederation, and is an enormously expensive accommodation to the French speaking population, estimated at over $2.4 billion annually (2006-07 figures for combine provinces and federal government spending).  Ontario spent the largest share estimated at over $623 million or $1,275 for each minority member. Quebec, in comparison, spent $50.5 million annually or $85 for each minority member.

What is frightening is that these figures are now 12 years out of date. Costs will have risen substantially over more than a decade. Using a modest 2% annual increase in costs, they would exceed $3 billion today.

Battle on the Plains of Abraham
Every taxpayer, irrespective of native language, or ethnicity, is dragged into paying a portion of this subsidy to French speaking people living outside Quebec. The vocal minority in Ontario, screaming that they have a right to subsidies from non-French taxpayers, is a strong signal for us to fight back from being dragged into an Ontario - Quebec feud that has its roots in the 1759 Battle on the Plains of Abraham

Despite substantial concessions to the French speaking population in the 1774 Quebec Act, the feud rages on.

The Official Languages Act must be repealed and replaced with legislation that provides for French language services in accordance with Sections 16 through 22 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There is nothing therein that prevents provision of minority language services through qualified translators. The notion that government officials and employees must be bilingual is nonsense. Our civil service must be populated based on competence, not language.

We forget that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms exists to protect us from our governments. The opening paragraph of the Charter reads:

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

The Official Languages Act cannot be construed as demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. The French language is solidly protected under our constitution. The Official Languages Act overrides the equality rights of non-French citizens and cannot stand as written.

Since there is no such thing as ‘enough’ in this feud, it is time for English speaking people to declare the level of subsidy they are willing to accept … and pay for. The constitution (which embodies the charter) spells out the terms and they must be adhered to.

Language is not a tool to promote French use in English Canada.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: You Have To Be A Bit Crazy

  Ward and his wife Carleen celebrating his win on election night.   In March of this year, I took on the role of Campaign Manager for BC Conservative candidate Ward Stamer.  It’s the third time I’ve had the opportunity as I took on the role for Peter Sharp in 2013, and for Dennis Giesbrecht in 2020. Now let me tell you, in the past, a BC Conservative campaign team generally consisted of myself, the candidate and one or two helpers – and very little in the way of a campaign budget. Thankfully, a benefit of having spent 30+ years in the broadcast media afforded me the ability to do ad copy and write candidate speeches, and prep both Dennis and Peter to deal with the media – it’s also something I have always enjoyed. That was part of my duties this time around as well, however having a team of a dozen and a half volunteers meant that for the first time we had people available to ID our supporters, put together and install campaign signs, distribute campaign literature, and help out at ou

Rustad will support policy for 'everyday' people, otherwise work to bring down NDP

  Conservative Party of B.C. John Rustad Tuesday (Oct. 29) said his party would support government policies that support "average, everyday working" persons in B.C., but also repeated earlier promises to bring down the B.C. NDP government under Premier David Eby. "If there are things that are moved forward that will improve lives for those people, we would be looking at support it," Rustad said. "But if he's going to carry forward with the destructive policies that he has, then yes, we are going to look at every opportunity possible to bring him down as soon as possible."  CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more