Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FRANK LEONARD: From tires to sewage, I followed my Dad’s advice on conflict of interest - "the only thing you can take to the grave is your last name, your reputation"


Dad’s advice on conflicts of interest

I approached the civic election in the fall of 1986 with some purpose and determination.  I really had a sense that this was something I could do well so although a victory was not at all certain, I was thinking through the logistics that would flow from a win.  How would I manage family, work and a public life; what business and social organizations would I resign from; and how would we resolve the potential conflict of interest.  While my focus was to be elected Alderman, I needed to address the fact that Saanich was one of our family tire business’ biggest customers.

In 1986 the legislation was not as clear as it is now regarding how a Council member could be a supplier to the local government where they were elected – or even if they could.  Most relied on case law to define ‘the rules’ rather than legislation.  I approached our family lawyer who gave a verbal opinion which amounted to ‘don’t worry about it.’

This seemed too good to be true so I went to another firm and got a written opinion. It cited case law to conclude it was a conflict and that I would likely be challenged by some in attempt to have me disqualified from office.  So there I was – two opinions, exactly opposite - what to do?


So I presented a strategy my Dad: if I win, we can keep the business and I’ll excuse myself when the annual tender comes up; in addition, if I am challenged we fight the case by pointing out that I never voted on the awarding of the contract.  My Dad didn’t hesitate with his reply: if I win, we give up the business because the only thing you can take to the grave ‘is your last name.’  That was it.  No legal wrangling, no case law – just gut instinct.  My Dad said he never wanted our last name to be tainted by accusations so we would give up our largest customer if I won.   

In fact, after my first year led to other appointments, we ended up giving up not only the Saanich contract, but the regional district, the water board and transit.

I use the phrase ‘the only thing you can take to the grave is your last name, your reputation’ when I give advice to newly-elected council members.  When in doubt, get out’ is the other way to ensure you go beyond what is written in legislation and live up to a higher standard.

While adhering to this mantra had a financial cost at the start of my political career, it was ironic it had a political cost at the end.  Nothing was crazier than the sewage debate in Greater Victoria over the years ... but when we went from ‘if’ we should treat our sewage to ‘how’, I was in an awkward position.  I served in Board roles within BC’s public pension investment world and they owned a firm which was courting the project. In addition, my oldest son worked for an engineering firm that was a supplier to the regional district. 

For a while I took part in the meetings on the project when it was at a high conceptual level, and looked to excuse myself when it moved to procurement, but I was on edge and uncomfortable the whole time. Ultimately, I chose to send another member of Saanich Council in my place to these particular committee meetings rather than someday be accused of a conflict.

The irony was that I ended up being accused of neglecting this project by ‘missing’ so many meetings and thus there was a political price.  

In hindsight, I have no regrets.  You see if my Dad was willing to pay a financial price to ensure our good name goes with us to the grave then I don’t mind it having a political price as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

“With the talent and dedication of this caucus we will hold David Eby to account for his government’s out of control spending and ongoing failures in healthcare, public safety and addictions" — John Rustad

Today, John Rustad, Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia, proudly unveiled his shadow cabinet, a dynamic team of talented individuals ready to hold David Eby’s disastrous government accountable and present a strong alternative vision for British Columbia. “ Our shadow cabinet is a diverse and experienced group, committed to restoring prosperity, public safety, and affordability for every British Columbian ,” said Rustad. “ With experts in every field, we are focused on delivering real solutions for the challenges our province faces .” Rustad emphasized the historic appointment of Aaliya Warbus as House Leader. The shadow cabinet reflects the Conservative Party’s vision to build a brighter future for British Columbia. The appointments are as follows: Leadership Positions : Aaliya Warbus – House Leader Bruce Banman – Whip Sheldon Claire – Deputy Whip Portfolios : Tony Luck – Municipal Affairs and Local Government Sharon Hartwell – Rural Communities and Rural Development I

Labels

Show more