Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Columbia River Treaty -- The Americans will undoubtedly want a reduction in the Canadian Entitlement but that’s what negotiations are all about


On Wednesday of this week (December 5th) the BC government will be holding a community meeting in Invermere.  At the meeting, local area residents will be given an update on the state of Columbia River Treaty (CRT) negotiations … and provided an opportunity for discussion of community interests relating to the treaty.

Also attending the meeting will be BC Liberal MLA for Columbia River – Revelstoke, and opposition critic for the CRT, Doug Clovechok.  I spoke with Doug on the weekend to ask him about the meeting, and its importance:

I fought hard to get them (BC NDP government) back here to talk to my headwater communities.  The Americans will undoubtedly want a reduction in the Canadian Entitlement, but that’s what negotiations are all about.”

I asked if he would be attending the meeting, as well as making comment himself:

BC Liberal MLA Doug Clovechok, and wife Susan (Area
“F” Director for the Regional District of the E. Kootenay)
Yes, on both counts. The purpose of the meeting is to get input from constituents, and I am looking forward to it”.

Interestingly, in an age of fiercely adversarial politics, Clovechok was positive towards Katrine Conroy, BC’s Minister Responsible for the Columbia River Treaty:

I have been working closely with the Minister. This file is truly one that can be approached with a non-partisan lens. This is important to people in the basin, as the Columbia River Treaty drives revenue for the Columbia Basin Trust 

He continued, “The NDP remain committed to the 14 principals we set out in 2014

Of the 14 principle, the first sets out the tone of what is to follow … The primary objective of the Treaty should be to maximize benefits to both countries through the coordination of planning and operations.

To that point Clovechok’s thoughts on the Treaty, and the importance of the negotiations, were not lost on me … nor should they be to other British Columbians:

The modernization of this treaty is complex as there are many downstream benefits that the Americans receive from it, that were never negotiated in the original”.


Still”, he said, “There’s no question that the Columbia River Treaty is a shining example of one of this planets most successful trans-border water treaties”.

The significance of the treaty, to those in the Columbia River Basin, again becomes borne out in these words from Clovechok, regarding his counter-part NDP Katrine Conroy:

I have a great working relationship on this with her. I think it is because (former BC Liberal MLA and Minister Responsible for the CRT) Bill Bennett afforded her the same courtesy. Her husband was one of the key drivers behind the creation of the Columbia Basin Trust when he was an NDP MLA”.

And what thoughts about the agreement, from BC’s Minister Responsible for the Columbia River Treaty, Katrine Conroy?

The renewed discussions about how we can work together to modernize the treaty are still at an early stage. This is a time to build relationships and find common ground.”

I know that negotiators from both sides of the border are working very hard as they look at options for the future of the treaty”, she concluded.

Following Wednesday’s community meeting in Invermere, the next round of Columbia River Treaty negotiation meetings will take place Dec 12th and 13th in Vancouver.

I’m Alan Forseth in Kamloops.  If you have any thoughts on this commentary, please take a moment to share them below in the Comments Section. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...

Wildfire waste plan torched -- Forestry critic Stamer calls BC's wildfire salvage rate 'a failure'

Claims that BC is making progress salvaging wildfire-damaged timber are masking deeper problems in the forest sector, the province’s forestry critic says. Last week, BC’s Ministry of Forests said mills in the province processed more than one million cubic metres of wildfire chips in 2024-25, up from 500,000 cubic metres in 2023 and representing about seven per cent of all processed wood. Kamloops-North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer said those claims of progress ignore the reality that only a fraction of burned timber is being used ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Claire Rattée: Safer Supply Rollback Confirms Government Ignored Warnings for Years

Conservative Critic for Mental Health & Addictions Claire Rattée As new witnessed-consumption rules for BC’s prescribed safer supply program takes effect December 30, Conservative Critic for Mental Health, Addictions and Housing Supports Claire Rattée says the change confirms the NDP government ignored years of warnings and allowed a failed policy experiment to continue long after its harms were clear. “ As of today, the NDP is quietly admitting what families, front-line workers, and the Opposition have been saying all along: handing out take-home opioids without supervision was reckles s,” said Rattée. “ The government is acting now because the consequences became impossible to deny .” The shift ends the widespread take-home model that was expanded during the pandemic and maintained long after concerns about diversion emerged. It follows leaked internal law-enforcement documents showing a significant proportion of prescribed opioids were being diverted, including thr...

Labels

Show more