Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Columbia River Treaty -- The Americans will undoubtedly want a reduction in the Canadian Entitlement but that’s what negotiations are all about


On Wednesday of this week (December 5th) the BC government will be holding a community meeting in Invermere.  At the meeting, local area residents will be given an update on the state of Columbia River Treaty (CRT) negotiations … and provided an opportunity for discussion of community interests relating to the treaty.

Also attending the meeting will be BC Liberal MLA for Columbia River – Revelstoke, and opposition critic for the CRT, Doug Clovechok.  I spoke with Doug on the weekend to ask him about the meeting, and its importance:

“I fought hard to get them (BC NDP government) back here to talk to my headwater communities.  The Americans will undoubtedly want a reduction in the Canadian Entitlement, but that’s what negotiations are all about.”

I asked if he would be attending the meeting, as well as making comment himself:

BC Liberal MLA Doug Clovechok, and wife Susan (Area
“F” Director for the Regional District of the E. Kootenay)
“Yes, on both counts. The purpose of the meeting is to get input from constituents, and I am looking forward to it”.

Interestingly, in an age of fiercely adversarial politics, Clovechok was positive towards Katrine Conroy, BC’s Minister Responsible for the Columbia River Treaty:

“I have been working closely with the Minister. This file is truly one that can be approached with a non-partisan lens. This is important to people in the basin, as the Columbia River Treaty drives revenue for the Columbia Basin Trust” 

He continued, “The NDP remain committed to the 14 principals we set out in 2014”

Of the 14 principle, the first sets out the tone of what is to follow … The primary objective of the Treaty should be to maximize benefits to both countries through the coordination of planning and operations.

To that point Clovechok’s thoughts on the Treaty, and the importance of the negotiations, were not lost on me … nor should they be to other British Columbians:

“The modernization of this treaty is complex as there are many downstream benefits that the Americans receive from it, that were never negotiated in the original”.

“Still”, he said, “There’s no question that the Columbia River Treaty is a shining example of one of this planets most successful trans-border water treaties”.

The significance of the treaty, to those in the Columbia River Basin, again becomes borne out in these words from Clovechok, regarding his counter-part NDP Katrine Conroy:

“I have a great working relationship on this with her. I think it is because (former BC Liberal MLA and Minister Responsible for the CRT) Bill Bennett afforded her the same courtesy. Her husband was one of the key drivers behind the creation of the Columbia Basin Trust when he was an NDP MLA”.

And what thoughts about the agreement, from BC’s Minister Responsible for the Columbia River Treaty, Katrine Conroy?

“The renewed discussions about how we can work together to modernize the treaty are still at an early stage. This is a time to build relationships and find common ground.”

“I know that negotiators from both sides of the border are working very hard as they look at options for the future of the treaty”, she concluded.

Following Wednesday’s community meeting in Invermere, the next round of Columbia River Treaty negotiation meetings will take place Dec 12th and 13th in Vancouver.

I’m Alan Forseth in Kamloops.  If you have any thoughts on this commentary, please take a moment to share them below in the Comments Section. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more