Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Our health care system is in shambles, and it isn’t hard to figure out why


Our health care system is in shambles, and it isn’t hard to figure out why – political interference.

We need health care professionals to set out reasonable standards for public health care procedures and services. We need to have their plans peer reviewed, and when we are satisfied, write the standards into regulations and then get out of the road.

Let the people delivering services decide how to best do it.

We are wrong to avoid allowing private enterprise delivery of health care … and that is why standards of service delivery and patient care are important. Private delivery does not mean lower standards. We already have a complex schedule of costs for medical procedures. We allow money “X” amount of money for a hip replacement. Some will be easy, others complicated but we fund them at an average. Private clinics would receive the same funding.


The fly in the ointment is infrastructure. Currently, taxpayers fund all of the facilities, equipment, supplies and services such as cleaning, food and laundry. We need to establish what those costs are and make allowance to compensate a private sector facility for part of its investments in infrastructure. Over time, we shift part of the unfractured costs to the private sector and use private sector infrastructure development costs as a template to keep public sector investment costs down. 
 
The objective is not to make entrepreneurs rich -- or to give preference to people with money. We have to greatly enhance medical care efficiency, and service delivery, to all Canadians, irrespective of domicile.

History shows that governments have no incentive to do more with less. There is no government enterprise that is efficient and effective. Bureaucracy and operating costs increase annually whether services delivered stay the same or shrink.
   
We need the innovations that private enterprise and non-profits bring to the table. An outstanding example is the STARS air ambulance service operating in the three prairie provinces. It was not a government imitative. The original aircraft and crew was funded by Lions International, and its expansion was funded by the petroleum industry. Big bad oil helped to bring ambulance services to remote areas those of us who live out here are most grateful for.


Provinces can’t allow private health care delivery because Ottawa won’t let them. Ottawa insist that would violate terms of the Canada Health Act and if provinces offend, they will not receive federal health care funding.

No one has ever explained how that is in the best interests of Canadians needing health care.

We must end this ridiculous federal - provincial power struggle and focus on what is best for our society. It is not autocratic health care rule by our federal government. Provinces deliver our health care. Federal health care responsibilities for aboriginals, prison inmates and military personnel have all been farmed out to the provinces.

The federal government contends that because it provides a health care fund transfer to provinces, it has the right to dictate equality of services across the nation. It is not about equality of services; it is about retaining government control over health care.

Here is what I believe we need to have done:

  1. get the federal government out of health care -- stop health care transfers – and transfer tax points to the provinces instead so they collect the entire tax to fund health care 
  2. reduce federal taxes accordingly 
  3. allow private enterprise and non-profits to provide health care services that meet health care and patient care standards 
  4. improve efficiencies to deliver more services for the same or less money.


Governments are failing to keep up with the demand for health care services. We must innovate or see more people unable to access the care they need.   

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more