Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Twenty-Two countries cause 80.38% of worldwide man-made carbon emissions – OR -- When you suspect someone is trying to swindle you, you cease to deal with that person or entity


The message seems to be clear: Earth's climate is rapidly changing as a result of human activity. So how is it that some people are still reluctant to acknowledge it?

According to some psychologists, there are a number of reasons, including the prevalence of deceptive or erroneous information about the topic.

"But you're also getting a lot of misinformation, what we call agnotology — misleading information and false information — from vested interests," said Michael Ranney, professor of education the University of California, Berkeley's Department of Psychology. "And the internet, for decades, has been offering information that is misleading."

CLICK HERE to read full CBC News story:

A professor of Education at Berkley University is an unlikely expert on climate change.

We understand that our climate is changing. That is not new. There is substantial doubt that the change is more rapid then before. Modern communications have increased awareness, but it does not follow that changes are more pronounced.

There is also doubt that the change is entirely man-made. We don’t know because other contributing factors have not been studied. That is like trying to draw an elephant having only examined its trunk.   

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) only studies climate change related to human activity. It does not study any other factors such as solar energy so the assumption that climate change is driven by man-made emissions is false. It has some impact, but we do not know how much or if curtailing human emissions will slow climate change. We are making assumptions without knowing if climate change can be affected.

Second, 22 countries cause 80.38% of worldwide man-made carbon emissions ... another 26 countries cause 10.54% ... and the remaining 148 nations, including international air travel and shipping, account for 9.08% of emissions.

What is the point of representatives from 150 nations gathering in Poland when only 22 can have any real effect on emission reductions?


China, currently accountable for 29.51% of emissions, has announced she will continue to increase emissions until 2030. The USA (14.34%) pulled out of the Paris Agreement. India (6.8%) and Russia (4.88%) are not likely to reduce emissions. That is 55.53% of emissions unlikely to decrease.

China, the world’s most populated country has an enormous export market, which has seen its industry grow to become a serious danger to the planet. In just five provinces, which that host most of these industries, more dioxide is emitted than in any other country in the world. As a consequence, Beijing has experienced, in recent years, constant red alerts for environmental pollution.


If you think I am annoyed by some twit from an American university telling me that I need my head read for questioning why we need to gather a couple of thousand representatives in Poland, all on the public dime, you are correct. Most of them have no skin in the game. They gather to party every other year, blame developed nations for climate change and demand we act to stop it.

If you think I am annoyed by the CBC publishing this piece of crap suggesting that we are dolts for not believing the IPCC without critical examination or asking pertinent questions you are correct. When governments and the media strive to stifle honest discussion and debate on any issue, it is because they are not truthful and don’t want to be shown up as the swindlers they are. 

In November 2015 Prime Minister Trudeau announced he was providing funding to developing nations to help them combat carbon emissions:
… $300 million in 2016-17
… $400 million in 2017-18
… $500 million in 2018-19
… $650 million in 2019-20
… $800 million in 2020-21

That is $2.65 billion of taxpayer funds to help nations with negligible emissions. This program should be stopped forthwith. We can use the last $1.45 billion for some useful purpose.

When you suspect someone is trying to swindle you, you cease to deal with that person or entity. We need to pull out of the United Nations. Not just the Paris agreement, all of it. No more membership, no more dues, no more support to any faction of the organization. It is not to be trusted.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more