Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Equalization is broken, and the federal government is complicit in perpetuating a system of support to provinces that is unequal, unfair and unreasonable


Quebec to receive $1.4-billion equalization boost while oil-producing provinces face deficits
Justin Tang/The Canadian Press ~~ Bill Curry/Globe & Mail ~~ December 9, 2018

Quebec will receive $13.1-billion in equalization payments next year – a $1.4-billion increase – while Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador continue to be left out even though Canada’s oil-producing provinces are facing deficits and hard times.

The equalization system is … aimed at ensuring provinces can provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation … it is a frequent source of tension between the “have” provinces and the “have not” provinces that receive the payments.

The governments of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador – where government finances are heavily influenced by the state of the energy sector – are all running budget deficits … in contrast, Quebec’s government announced last month that the province’s finances for the year were sitting at a $3-billion surplus …

CLICK HERE to read full story


Equalization is broken. The federal government is complicit in perpetuating a system of support to provinces that is unequal, unfair and unreasonable.


The equalization formula was due to expire March 31, 2019, and it followed that there should have been extensive consultation with provinces prior to renewal. Instead the federal government extended the formula to 2024 under its June 2014 Budget Implementation Act.

Debates over equalization payments are never easy.  Many, especially in the west, were pushing for changes, but this debate ended before it even began. The government avoided controversy by ducking its responsibility to treat provinces equally and fairly.

Actions speak louder than words and this action is not acceptable. Our federal government is too timid to exercise its authority and build the pipelines we need to market our resources. Pretending that its reluctance is a result of its commitment to fight climate change is ridiculous. The world is not reducing carbon emissions to meet Paris Agreement targets.

It is delusional for our government to believe that it is, and that Canada can contribute significantly to reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. Common sense and critical analysis are not government strong points. We deserve better. 

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

  1. Edward HollettDecember 10, 2018 at 10:50 AM

    Equalization is about incomes, not outcomes. Since AB, SK, and NL already have more than enough revenue to meet the national standards in Equalization on their own, what's unfair about it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alan ForsethDecember 10, 2018 at 1:30 PM

      How about the fact that Quebec goes stupid in debt -- still manages to have a balanced budget -- and yet still receives a ridiculous amount from the Equalization Fund. That makes no sense at all. And then there's the fact they vehemently oppose the very resource development projects that provides them with billions in Equalization payments ... that's disgusting.

      Delete
  2. Alan ForsethDecember 10, 2018 at 11:34 AM

    Here's the telling tale of STUPIDITY from October 2017 ... Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre celebrated the Energy East (cancellation) announcement on Thursday, suggesting that citizen groups and local politicians from the Montreal-area played a key role in putting a stop to the project.

    WHAT A MORON!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. KurtDecember 10, 2018 at 3:01 PM

    Equalization rewards incompetence. NB receives 30 % of their annual budget from equalization. Why risk anything? By the way...P.E.T when making up the equalization formula left out Quebec's income from ALL of their hydro electric business from the formula. Of course eastern Canada is in no hurry to update anything.
    The elephant in the room is western separation.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Alan ForsethDecember 10, 2018 at 3:11 PM

    That call seems to be getting louder and louder once again ... and all because of another individual named Trudeau

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH: You Have To Be A Bit Crazy

  Ward and his wife Carleen celebrating his win on election night.   In March of this year, I took on the role of Campaign Manager for BC Conservative candidate Ward Stamer.  It’s the third time I’ve had the opportunity as I took on the role for Peter Sharp in 2013, and for Dennis Giesbrecht in 2020. Now let me tell you, in the past, a BC Conservative campaign team generally consisted of myself, the candidate and one or two helpers – and very little in the way of a campaign budget. Thankfully, a benefit of having spent 30+ years in the broadcast media afforded me the ability to do ad copy and write candidate speeches, and prep both Dennis and Peter to deal with the media – it’s also something I have always enjoyed. That was part of my duties this time around as well, however having a team of a dozen and a half volunteers meant that for the first time we had people available to ID our supporters, put together and install campaign signs, distribute campaign literature, and help out at ou
Post a Comment
Read more

Rustad will support policy for 'everyday' people, otherwise work to bring down NDP

  Conservative Party of B.C. John Rustad Tuesday (Oct. 29) said his party would support government policies that support "average, everyday working" persons in B.C., but also repeated earlier promises to bring down the B.C. NDP government under Premier David Eby. "If there are things that are moved forward that will improve lives for those people, we would be looking at support it," Rustad said. "But if he's going to carry forward with the destructive policies that he has, then yes, we are going to look at every opportunity possible to bring him down as soon as possible."  CLICK HERE for the full story
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more