Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Equalization is broken, and the federal government is complicit in perpetuating a system of support to provinces that is unequal, unfair and unreasonable


Quebec to receive $1.4-billion equalization boost while oil-producing provinces face deficits
Justin Tang/The Canadian Press ~~ Bill Curry/Globe & Mail ~~ December 9, 2018

Quebec will receive $13.1-billion in equalization payments next year – a $1.4-billion increase – while Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador continue to be left out even though Canada’s oil-producing provinces are facing deficits and hard times.

The equalization system is … aimed at ensuring provinces can provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation … it is a frequent source of tension between the “have” provinces and the “have not” provinces that receive the payments.

The governments of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador – where government finances are heavily influenced by the state of the energy sector – are all running budget deficits … in contrast, Quebec’s government announced last month that the province’s finances for the year were sitting at a $3-billion surplus …

CLICK HERE to read full story


Equalization is broken. The federal government is complicit in perpetuating a system of support to provinces that is unequal, unfair and unreasonable.


The equalization formula was due to expire March 31, 2019, and it followed that there should have been extensive consultation with provinces prior to renewal. Instead the federal government extended the formula to 2024 under its June 2014 Budget Implementation Act.

Debates over equalization payments are never easy.  Many, especially in the west, were pushing for changes, but this debate ended before it even began. The government avoided controversy by ducking its responsibility to treat provinces equally and fairly.

Actions speak louder than words and this action is not acceptable. Our federal government is too timid to exercise its authority and build the pipelines we need to market our resources. Pretending that its reluctance is a result of its commitment to fight climate change is ridiculous. The world is not reducing carbon emissions to meet Paris Agreement targets.

It is delusional for our government to believe that it is, and that Canada can contribute significantly to reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. Common sense and critical analysis are not government strong points. We deserve better. 

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

  1. Edward HollettDecember 10, 2018 at 10:50 AM

    Equalization is about incomes, not outcomes. Since AB, SK, and NL already have more than enough revenue to meet the national standards in Equalization on their own, what's unfair about it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alan ForsethDecember 10, 2018 at 1:30 PM

      How about the fact that Quebec goes stupid in debt -- still manages to have a balanced budget -- and yet still receives a ridiculous amount from the Equalization Fund. That makes no sense at all. And then there's the fact they vehemently oppose the very resource development projects that provides them with billions in Equalization payments ... that's disgusting.

      Delete
  2. Alan ForsethDecember 10, 2018 at 11:34 AM

    Here's the telling tale of STUPIDITY from October 2017 ... Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre celebrated the Energy East (cancellation) announcement on Thursday, suggesting that citizen groups and local politicians from the Montreal-area played a key role in putting a stop to the project.

    WHAT A MORON!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. KurtDecember 10, 2018 at 3:01 PM

    Equalization rewards incompetence. NB receives 30 % of their annual budget from equalization. Why risk anything? By the way...P.E.T when making up the equalization formula left out Quebec's income from ALL of their hydro electric business from the formula. Of course eastern Canada is in no hurry to update anything.
    The elephant in the room is western separation.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Alan ForsethDecember 10, 2018 at 3:11 PM

    That call seems to be getting louder and louder once again ... and all because of another individual named Trudeau

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more