HOW TO KILL THE RESOURCE INDUSTRY: Challenge Projects -- Delays – Opposition – Court Actions – Blockades – Double Standards – Broad Terms and Loose Definitions
From the cancellation of the Northern Gateway
project … to banning tanker traffic on BC’s north coast ... to roadblocks
effectively tying up the Trans Mountain pipeline in endless court action and
ever-changing rules … to the killing of the Energy East project – the resource
industry has faced never ending challenges that have killed important projects
for our province – and for our country.
Here’s just a brief refresher for you to check out.
Oil Tanker
Ban of BC’s North Coast:
CBC (Nov 2015) "This
ban ends
the Northern Gateway pipeline proposal," said Karen Mahon, from
ForestEthics. "Without tankers, crude oil has no place to go, that means
no pipelines, no oil trains moving tar sands to the northern BC coast."
Northern
Gateway Pipeline:
National Post
(Jan 2016) … alliance of First Nations is celebrating a British Columbia
Supreme Court ruling that it says could set back the Northern Gateway pipeline
by years and throw a wrench into another high-profile project review
CBC News (Nov 2016) … cabinet
killed the Enbridge-backed Northern Gateway … "It has become clear that
this project is not in the best interest of the local affected communities,
including Indigenous Peoples," Trudeau said.
Trans
Mountain Pipeline:
Globe and
Mail (August 2017) … BC NDP government warned Kinder Morgan that the company won't
be able to begin construction on its Trans Mountain pipeline expansion,
as the province pledged to join a legal challenge to ultimately kill the project.
CBC News (Aug 2017) … company's statement noted the
project was approved by the National Energy Board and the federal government
after "unprecedented" scrutiny and said the project would
bring jobs and economic benefits
iPolitics (August 2018) … the
federal government must go back to the drawing board and ask the National
Energy Board to redo the report that had recommended the Trans Mountain project
… the court’s decision means the building of the pipeline must stop
CTV News (August 2018) … (the
Federal Court of Appeal) has overturned Ottawa's approval of the contentious
Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, halting construction on the project
and sending the government back to the review phase
Energy East
project cancelled … Oct 2017
… the move came after the National Energy Board (NEB) said its review
would now consider indirect greenhouse gas emissions. TransCanada warned the project
could now ultimately be cancelled … the plan faced stiff opposition
from environmental groups concerned about oilsands extraction and pipeline
construction
Conservative
MP Lisa Raitt had much to say about that, including these comments posted on Twitter:
… Govt created "double standard in the
energy sector that's detrimental to Canadian interests"
… When will our Prime Minister see his policies
hurt Canadians & economy?
… Liberals put Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Algeria before Canada.
What's our PM got to say?
And now from Justin Trudeau's federal government comes
the latest in efforts to stonewall one of our nations biggest economic drivers –
key in generating high-paying jobs … and taxes that support Canada’s social
programs, infrastructure, health and education.
Bill C-69 was introduced to the House of Commons on February 28th. Here in part is what PR Associates said it
could mean for resource companies:
… “sustainability” defined as “the ability to protect the
environment, contribute to the social, economic well-being of the people of
Canada and preserve their health in a manner that benefits future and present
generations” – this will be a mandatory consideration … legislation has broad terms and lose definitions with very
few limits to the minister’s discretion in forming an opinion, thus
creating uncertainty for proponents … there are still many opportunities
for the minister to “stop the clock” during both the planning and assessment
phases, leading to further uncertainty
Finally, we now have several additional efforts to
slow and / or halt resource development created by our provincial NDP government, led by Premier John Horgan.
On their own, and presented individually over a number of weeks,
they do not appear to be harmful.
In looking at the interlocking aspects of them however, it is clear the
direction government is taking.
The first is from October 9th …
... individuals
undertaking these activities (mineral exploration and placer mining) became
subject to the requirement to obtain an authorization to use water … in
addition they would enable an engineer or water manager to require an
individual to apply for an authorization to use water if there is a risk of
significant adverse impact to the stream or to other authorized users
Next up is BC government news from October 22nd
… regarding the Professional Governance Act
The BC government
introduced legislation they said was aimed at making sure decisions affecting
the province’s natural resources are science-based,
transparent and protect B.C.’s unique environment for future generations. It went on to state its scope was to modernize and strengthen the roles and expectations of qualified professionals in the province … intended
to increase public access to natural
resource information and ensure
professionals are held to the highest ethical and technical standards.
Simple enough, right? But what will be the expectation on the
individuals making these decisions out in the field. Is
there a clear patter of implied, or suggested, expectations by the government? Will these professionals fear their jobs may be at
risk by not following some pretty vague expectations? I think so.
Green Party leader Andrew Weaver (L) along side of Premier John Horgan |
On to a BC government News Release from November 5th
…
… government
has introduced legislation to modernize the environmental assessment (EA) of
major resource projects … designed to provide a clear and timely path for the
approval of responsible resource projects … increase public engagement and
transparency and deliver stronger environmental protections … the environmental
assessment process in BC is a shared
priority between government and the BC Green Party caucus, and is part of
the Confidence and Supply Agreement ...
And then moving on to November 21st …
… the
amendments will support government’s actions to strengthen environmental
protection and remediation in areas where oil and gas activities occur … will
ensure British Columbia remains a leader in reducing upstream oil and gas
methane emissions, and supports the Province’s habitat protection and recovery
efforts
Again ... both of these seem harmless enough, but we
need to keep in mind the direction (real or implied) that our BC government has taken in
opposing resource development, and throwing roadblocks in its way.
And then finally we have this gem from just a few days ago (December 5th)
The Government of British Columbia has released its CleanBC plan aimed
at reducing climate pollution, while creating more jobs and economic
opportunities for people, businesses and communities.
“The low-carbon economy we build
together will bring opportunities and jobs throughout the province, so people
can live and work with greater security in the communities they call home,”
said Premier John Horgan. “By moving to
clean, renewable energy – like our abundant supply of BC electricity – we can
power our growing economy and make life better and more affordable for British
Columbians.”
In unveiling the CleanBC plan, Premier Horgan said his government has
put priority on … reducing climate pollution by shifting homes,
vehicles, industry and business off burning fossil fuels and toward greater
use of clean BC electricity and other renewable energies …
What
direction is government IMPOSING on the BC business community? It seems that come hell or high water it will
be a Green economy, or NO ECONOMY!
Should
we be continuing our effects to be more environmentally sensitive and to grow the green economy? Absolutely!
Does that mean shutting down an existing economy that continues to
provide wealth to its workers, and the government? Absolutely NOT!
It’s
time for British Columbians to speak up –- and speak up loudly – to tell our
NDP government to stop choking the life out of the resource industry. Too many jobs rely on it ... and in many
cases, the very life of many small towns in rural BC.
In
Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth. If you have any thoughts on this, I hope you
will share them directly below in the Comments Section.
I work in the resource extraction industry. Guess who protects the environment far more than any self-proclaimed environmentalist? Industry workers. I know a very easy way to get these projects approved.... develop a new set of rules. How? Different countries have different rules. If Eastern Canada delivers another gut punch to Western Canada.. the west will punch back.
ReplyDeleteThat seems to be a feeling that is growing louder and louder. I wonder how long it will take to become a roar?
DeletePretty sad world for those of us who think our resources should be used. All the little tails keep wagging the dog, and keep getting the oil to refuel themselves. Time for the govt to listen to the people who pay the wages of all these naysayers. Hope remember this in B.C. and vote no to Sheila Malcolmson's bid to become an NDP MLA. Also remember when it come to the Federal election on Oct 19\19.
ReplyDelete