Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Political candidates should be focused on how they can meet our needs, not pedaling party policy like a used car warranty (they are worth about the same)


Many of us are struggling, in particular pensioners, people who have lost jobs, people who can’t find jobs, those who suffer disabilities, and those who are homeless or poor.  It does not stop there. Most of us find that costs are steadily increasing, and incomes are not keeping pace. With each passing year, we have less left to sustain us.

We can look forward to 2019 as a watershed year. Increasing numbers are done and finished with governments that are not working for us. Many people tell me that they know change is needed, and then wonder who might lead that change.

Canada’s strength has always been with its people, not with its institutions. From our earliest days, people came together and built churches and community halls to serve them, not to manage or rule them. Canada is founded on building institutions that serve us.
 
Over time government leaders have created a system where the government controls us rather than serves us – it operates on the false premise that it has sole authority to decide which issues are the priority for us.

Collectively, we have allowed this gradual transformation, assuming that the people we elect have our best interests at heart. In many cases, they are good people who want to serve us.  Unfortunately, they are overridden by party officials and leader’s office strategists. Those people want to avoid alienating voters ... they pander to special interest groups ... and do whatever is necessary to either retain or gain power. To them, national and public interests are of no consequence.


We have fallen into a pattern of ignoring politics between elections, and assuming that there is nothing we can do to change the way we are governed. If fact, we can effect change, but we have to find our voices and let our representatives -- and their sponsoring political party -- know what we want.

How many of you have attended an all- candidates forum during an election, and noticed that each candidate has a copy of their party’s policies to refer to?

Our system is upside down. We don’t care what party policy is. The candidates should be asking us what issues we feel are important and need to be addressed. They should be focused on how they can meet our needs, not pedaling party policy like a used car warranty (they are worth about the same).

The key to real change, will be how much we engage – in other words, our political involvement. We have to get ourselves informed on issues of the day ... and what our governments are doing and not doing.

Apparently, it is not considered politically correct to discuss politics. Well, why not? We are free to express our opinions and views.

Some claim we must avoid political discussion because it leads to fights. Good! We need a decent brawl to clear the air. Remaining silent has allowed unelected party officials, and strategists, to carry on as usual. All they have accomplished is to thoroughly muck up our provinces, and our nation.

We deserve better and it is time that we make that known. Those who demand we carry on politics as usual need to understand that doing so is a ticket to defeat. We have no reason to support candidates or political parties that do not put our interests first. 


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...

Wildfire waste plan torched -- Forestry critic Stamer calls BC's wildfire salvage rate 'a failure'

Claims that BC is making progress salvaging wildfire-damaged timber are masking deeper problems in the forest sector, the province’s forestry critic says. Last week, BC’s Ministry of Forests said mills in the province processed more than one million cubic metres of wildfire chips in 2024-25, up from 500,000 cubic metres in 2023 and representing about seven per cent of all processed wood. Kamloops-North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer said those claims of progress ignore the reality that only a fraction of burned timber is being used ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Claire Rattée: Safer Supply Rollback Confirms Government Ignored Warnings for Years

Conservative Critic for Mental Health & Addictions Claire Rattée As new witnessed-consumption rules for BC’s prescribed safer supply program takes effect December 30, Conservative Critic for Mental Health, Addictions and Housing Supports Claire Rattée says the change confirms the NDP government ignored years of warnings and allowed a failed policy experiment to continue long after its harms were clear. “ As of today, the NDP is quietly admitting what families, front-line workers, and the Opposition have been saying all along: handing out take-home opioids without supervision was reckles s,” said Rattée. “ The government is acting now because the consequences became impossible to deny .” The shift ends the widespread take-home model that was expanded during the pandemic and maintained long after concerns about diversion emerged. It follows leaked internal law-enforcement documents showing a significant proportion of prescribed opioids were being diverted, including thr...

Labels

Show more