Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Political candidates should be focused on how they can meet our needs, not pedaling party policy like a used car warranty (they are worth about the same)


Many of us are struggling, in particular pensioners, people who have lost jobs, people who can’t find jobs, those who suffer disabilities, and those who are homeless or poor.  It does not stop there. Most of us find that costs are steadily increasing, and incomes are not keeping pace. With each passing year, we have less left to sustain us.

We can look forward to 2019 as a watershed year. Increasing numbers are done and finished with governments that are not working for us. Many people tell me that they know change is needed, and then wonder who might lead that change.

Canada’s strength has always been with its people, not with its institutions. From our earliest days, people came together and built churches and community halls to serve them, not to manage or rule them. Canada is founded on building institutions that serve us.
 
Over time government leaders have created a system where the government controls us rather than serves us – it operates on the false premise that it has sole authority to decide which issues are the priority for us.

Collectively, we have allowed this gradual transformation, assuming that the people we elect have our best interests at heart. In many cases, they are good people who want to serve us.  Unfortunately, they are overridden by party officials and leader’s office strategists. Those people want to avoid alienating voters ... they pander to special interest groups ... and do whatever is necessary to either retain or gain power. To them, national and public interests are of no consequence.


We have fallen into a pattern of ignoring politics between elections, and assuming that there is nothing we can do to change the way we are governed. If fact, we can effect change, but we have to find our voices and let our representatives -- and their sponsoring political party -- know what we want.

How many of you have attended an all- candidates forum during an election, and noticed that each candidate has a copy of their party’s policies to refer to?

Our system is upside down. We don’t care what party policy is. The candidates should be asking us what issues we feel are important and need to be addressed. They should be focused on how they can meet our needs, not pedaling party policy like a used car warranty (they are worth about the same).

The key to real change, will be how much we engage – in other words, our political involvement. We have to get ourselves informed on issues of the day ... and what our governments are doing and not doing.

Apparently, it is not considered politically correct to discuss politics. Well, why not? We are free to express our opinions and views.

Some claim we must avoid political discussion because it leads to fights. Good! We need a decent brawl to clear the air. Remaining silent has allowed unelected party officials, and strategists, to carry on as usual. All they have accomplished is to thoroughly muck up our provinces, and our nation.

We deserve better and it is time that we make that known. Those who demand we carry on politics as usual need to understand that doing so is a ticket to defeat. We have no reason to support candidates or political parties that do not put our interests first. 


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more