Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

The Ministry of Health received your request for access to information under FOIPPA on December 11, 2018 (this with regards to the Nanaimo ICU announcement of Nov 21st)



On Wednesday November 21st, I presented a post entitled; As a new ICU for Nanaimo General Hospital is announced, one medical staffer says the current one is, “…the grossest in Canada”

NDP Health Minister Adrian Dix
There were a number of follow-up questions I had regarding the announcement, made by Health Minister Adrian Dix, and so I contacted (as advised by a spokesperson from Island Health) the Nanaimo area media contact.

My questions were fairly simple I thought:
I understand the formal request for the new ICU was made to the government in October 2017 -- are you able to elaborate on the process for how this is / was done, and who formally makes the request on behalf of the hospital (or is it Island Health which makes the request)?

I have been informed that for new government facilities, there is usually a three to five year capitol plan created to prepare and develope the project, as well as the time needed for creating the business plan.  It seems from those numbers, that preparation for the new ICU must have begun several years ago; would I be correct in this?  If not, are you able to advise when the business and capitol plan was developed?

The existing 10 bed ICU facility has been severely over-crowed for some time now, and this year is expected to care for 2,500 people.  The new facility is expected to be caring for an additional 700 patients (or a 30% increase) within the next 15 years.  How many beds will be in the new ICU, and how far in to the future do you expect it will be able to meet the needs of hospital patients in the region?

Lastly, I understand that an HAU (High Acuity Unit) differs somewhat from an ICU, in that patients needs are not quite as acute -- would this be correct?  Does NRGH currently have HAU beds, and are any additional ones planned as part of the new ICU project? 

Despite several promises to provide the information, it was NOT forthcoming.  As a result, I placed a Freedom of Information Request.  Confirmation of my request, an edited version which follows below, was received today; I hope to be able to provide details on the questions asked, later in January.

December 11, 2018

Re:  Request for Access to Records 
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIPPA) 


The Ministry of Health received your request for access to information under FOIPPA on December 11, 2018.  We understand your request to be for:
Regarding the new ICU in Nanaimo, the request which was made to government in 2017
  • All records relating to this request including the dates the request was made, who formally made the request and if the process was different than normally followed;
  • Records indicating who/what body prepared the business and capital plan and the length of time it took to prepare; Records indicating how long this new facility will be able to meet the needs of Nanaimo before another expansion will be required;
  • Records indicating the difference between HAU and ICU, including how many HAU beds NRGR currently has and if any additional beds will be provided as part of this new project.
...  we will make every effort to respond to your request by January 25, 2019.  We will notify you as soon as possible if there is a need to extend the time limit for responding to your request.

Please note that this is an acknowledgement of your request and that an assessment of potential fees specific to your request has not been made at this time ... in the event that there is a fee associated with your request, you will be contacted at a later date with a fee estimate.

Please also be advised that the response to your request (subject to limited exemptions) will be published on the BC Government’s Open Information website after its release to you.  Your identity will be protected in the response.  To find out more about Open Information please access the Open Information website at: http://www.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/.

Should you have any questions now or during the processing of your request please contact our office at 250 abc-1234 (number edited from this post) and ask to speak with the analyst assigned to your request.  Please quote the file number(s) identified at the top of this letter.

If calling from Vancouver dial ....

Regards,
Jan Doe (name edited from this post) 
Consolidated Intake Information Access Operations

Stay tuned ...
Alan

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more