Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- Rather than a healthy, vigorous (but healthy) exchange of ideas and solutions, it’s an all-out war of words in a last-ditch effort to win a majority government on election day


As the summer BBQ tour continues and the federal election candidates make the best of the long, hot days on the hustings, the campaign will heat up as September draws closer.

“Crazy season” starts when the partisan faithful try every angle to get the edge on their competition. It’s when democratic debate turns into a bare-knuckle prize fight. Perhaps it’s the most visible symptom of the sickness in our democracy. 

Rather than a healthy, vigorous (but healthy) exchange of ideas and solutions, it’s an all-out war of words in a last-ditch effort to win a majority government on election day.


I’ve been through a couple campaigns now and it’s a personal test. Social media platforms are both super useful engagement tools and supercharged outrage machines that can overwhelm a candidate and campaign team. The bigger the perceived threat by the competition, the larger the target and the more vicious the attacks.

It’s not the best time in our communities. While we should be focusing on the ideas and solutions, the passion and desperation in a campaign can easily become personal.

The stakes are high because power distribution only happens once every four years. Pressure on the party leaders, backroom strategists, pollsters and number-crunchers, campaign managers and candidates is intense. Each and every campaign team is staffed with volunteers who are heavily invested in achieving a specific outcome in an ever-decreasing amount of time. The clock is always ticking.

Changing the culture of crazy season

With all of these factors on the field of play, how do we change the nature of the game? How do we continue to inspire and engage as many people in the debate as we can while keeping the focus on ideas and solutions?

It starts with a hopeful message, founded on a clear vision of the future we are working toward and an achievable plan to accomplish it.

We have to design an inclusive culture in our campaign teams modeled by the leader and candidates, nurtured by the team leads on the ground in each riding. The priority outcome should be a thoughtful government that looks after the entire spectrum of social, environmental and economic responsibilities of the community, province or country, whatever the case may be.

Finally, our tone is crucial. We need to be able to challenge and critique the proposed ideas and solutions of our competition in a respectful way. How do we do this when time is running out and the pressure is increasing? We need to stay out of the political ditch and in our own lane, demonstrate the value we add to the discussion and commit to changing the culture of campaigning and governing.

Yes, it’s easier to say these words than do it. However, the future of our community, province, country and planet is at stake so it’s worth the effort!



Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more