Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Getting our knickers in a knot over which available foods are healthiest is like sorting through a pirate chest of gold, silver and jewels trying to decide what we like best

Conservatives 'declaring war on Canada Food Guide' like they did on long-form census, Trudeau says -- Recently revamped guide is 'based on evidence, based on science, based on research,' PM says

Peter Zimonjic ~~ CBC News ~~ Jul 18, 2019


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is defending his government's update to the Canada Food Guide in the wake of attacks by Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer who suggested the changes were riddled with "bias" and driven by "ideology."

... Health Canada restructured the Food Guide in January, eliminating the emphasis on food groups and recommended servings. The new guide recommends eating protein that comes from plants more often as well topping up on "plenty of vegetables and fruits, whole grain foods and protein foods."

... "The process was flawed," Scheer said of the new guide. "Complete lack of consultation. Seems to be ideologically driven by people who have a philosophical perspective and a bias against certain types of healthy food products. So absolutely we want to get that right."
Most of us recognized revised Canada Food Guide as another attempt by the loony left to convince us that people are herbivores, not carnivores and continue to ignore it.

From an electability standpoint, this is a clanger. Scheer might as well have hung a “For Sale” sign around his neck. Making the announcement at a dairy cartel meeting does not pass the smell test. We wonder who else is on his favoured supporters list.

The Canada Health Food Guide is not on anyone’s list of issues that matter in choosing a leader and party to form the next government.

A few million of us recall when doctors endorsed filtered cigarettes as healthier for us and millions more have tried doctor recommended diets to make us lose weight and get healthier. Some did but tens of thousands regretted wasting their time and money on each fad diet.

We have such an abundance of food choices that we have the luxury of arguing over which items are healthier than others. We have no idea what real hunger or starvation is like. Our forefathers and most certainly our ancestors had no such luxury. They ate what was available and were glad of it.

We had great migrations of people from one area to another when droughts, locusts, volcanic eruptions or other factors caused famines and people faced the choice of relocation or starvation.

People forget that commercially available electric power in Canada did not exist before 1881 ... and widespread electricity availability did not occur until the 1920s, about a century ago. Prior to that we had no way to keep food from spoiling in the summer heat or having perishables freeze in the winter.

The debate is unwinnable.

Beef, cheese, eggs, fish, milk, mutton, pork and poultry have been part of our diets for centuries. None have proven to be toxic. If they were, many of us would not be here today.

Getting our knickers in a knot over which of the foods available are healthiest is like sorting through a pirate’s chest of gold, silver and jewels trying to decide what we like best.

The Canada Food Guide is another example of the federal government meddling in our lives instead of carrying out its duties and responsibilities. Governments do not know what is best for us and must stop pretending that they do. This focus on irrelevant minutia is maddening.


John Feldsted 

Comments

  1. Do you like chocolate milk?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes ... and chocolate bars ... and chocolate syrup, and chocolate pudding, and all the flavours of chocolate ice cream. Not sure what your point is??

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more