Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Getting our knickers in a knot over which available foods are healthiest is like sorting through a pirate chest of gold, silver and jewels trying to decide what we like best

Conservatives 'declaring war on Canada Food Guide' like they did on long-form census, Trudeau says -- Recently revamped guide is 'based on evidence, based on science, based on research,' PM says

Peter Zimonjic ~~ CBC News ~~ Jul 18, 2019


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is defending his government's update to the Canada Food Guide in the wake of attacks by Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer who suggested the changes were riddled with "bias" and driven by "ideology."

... Health Canada restructured the Food Guide in January, eliminating the emphasis on food groups and recommended servings. The new guide recommends eating protein that comes from plants more often as well topping up on "plenty of vegetables and fruits, whole grain foods and protein foods."

... "The process was flawed," Scheer said of the new guide. "Complete lack of consultation. Seems to be ideologically driven by people who have a philosophical perspective and a bias against certain types of healthy food products. So absolutely we want to get that right."
Most of us recognized revised Canada Food Guide as another attempt by the loony left to convince us that people are herbivores, not carnivores and continue to ignore it.

From an electability standpoint, this is a clanger. Scheer might as well have hung a “For Sale” sign around his neck. Making the announcement at a dairy cartel meeting does not pass the smell test. We wonder who else is on his favoured supporters list.

The Canada Health Food Guide is not on anyone’s list of issues that matter in choosing a leader and party to form the next government.

A few million of us recall when doctors endorsed filtered cigarettes as healthier for us and millions more have tried doctor recommended diets to make us lose weight and get healthier. Some did but tens of thousands regretted wasting their time and money on each fad diet.

We have such an abundance of food choices that we have the luxury of arguing over which items are healthier than others. We have no idea what real hunger or starvation is like. Our forefathers and most certainly our ancestors had no such luxury. They ate what was available and were glad of it.

We had great migrations of people from one area to another when droughts, locusts, volcanic eruptions or other factors caused famines and people faced the choice of relocation or starvation.

People forget that commercially available electric power in Canada did not exist before 1881 ... and widespread electricity availability did not occur until the 1920s, about a century ago. Prior to that we had no way to keep food from spoiling in the summer heat or having perishables freeze in the winter.

The debate is unwinnable.

Beef, cheese, eggs, fish, milk, mutton, pork and poultry have been part of our diets for centuries. None have proven to be toxic. If they were, many of us would not be here today.

Getting our knickers in a knot over which of the foods available are healthiest is like sorting through a pirate’s chest of gold, silver and jewels trying to decide what we like best.

The Canada Food Guide is another example of the federal government meddling in our lives instead of carrying out its duties and responsibilities. Governments do not know what is best for us and must stop pretending that they do. This focus on irrelevant minutia is maddening.


John Feldsted 

Comments

  1. Do you like chocolate milk?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes ... and chocolate bars ... and chocolate syrup, and chocolate pudding, and all the flavours of chocolate ice cream. Not sure what your point is??

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more