Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FRASER INSTITUTE -- Bills C69 and C48 further damage investment climate of Canada’s energy sector while US investment soars


VANCOUVER—The ability of Canada’s energy sector to attract investment has been weakened by several government policies in recent years, all the while investment in the United States has soared, finds a new collection of essays released today by the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian policy think-tank.

While Canada’s energy sector has suffered from insufficient pipeline capacity, increased regulations and taxation, the U.S. energy sector has enjoyed sweeping tax reforms and a significant reduction in red tape,” said Robert P. Murphy, Fraser Institute senior fellow and co-author of the essay Policy and Regulatory Framework Changes in the U.S. and Canadian Oil and Gas Sector.

For example, Bill C-48, which bans oil tankers off British Columbia’s northern coast, and Bill C-69, which makes the approval process for major resource projects less certain and more complicated, became law last month.

And Canada continues to suffer a lack of pipeline capacity. Moreover, the federal government has also introduced new methane emission and ethanol regulations, and Alberta’s oilsands emissions remain capped.

On the tax front, while the U.S. recently lowered federal taxes (in part to encourage capital investment), governments across Canada have raised or maintained already high taxes on the energy sector.

For example, Ottawa’s federal carbon tax came into effect earlier this year. And Saskatchewan currently has the highest tax rate on new oil investment in North America, while British Columbia has one of the highest tax rates on new investment in natural gas.

Consequently, from 2016 to 2018, upstream oil and gas investment (essentially, exploration and production) increased 41 per cent in the U.S. but grew by only 15 per cent in Canada over the same time.

What’s more, oil and gas capital investment (as a share of all investment in Canada) declined from 28 per cent in 2014 to just 13.9 per cent in 2018.

Given the importance of Canada’s energy sector to the economy, policymakers should move quickly to create a more competitive investment climate in the oil and gas industries,” said Elmira Aliakbari, associate director of natural resource studies at the Fraser Institute and editor of the essay series.


The Fraser Institute is an independent Canadian public policy research and educational organization with offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, and Montreal and ties to a global network of think-tanks in 87 countries.

Its mission is to improve the quality of life for Canadians, their families and future generations by studying, measuring and broadly communicating the effects of government policies, entrepreneurship and choice on their well-being.

The Institute does not accept grants from governments or contracts for research.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more