Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FRASER INSTITUTE -- Quebec’s public-private pharmacare model provides more generous—and timely—access to new drugs


MONTREAL—Quebec’s universal pharmacare system, which relies on both a public plan and private insurance providers, covers more drugs and provides quicker access to new medicines than other Canadian provinces, finds a new study released today by the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think-tank.

Last month, a federally-appointed advisory panel (headed by former Ontario health minister Dr. Eric Hoskins) released a report calling for a government-run taxpayer-funded national pharmacare program—vastly different from Quebec’s system.

The Quebec model is proof that you can have universal—and generous—drug coverage using a mix of public and private insurance,” said Yanick Labrie, Fraser Institute senior fellow and author of Lessons from the Quebec Universal Prescription Drug Insurance Program.

The study finds that Quebec’s public plan provides greater access to prescription drugs than other provincial plans in Canada. For example, of all the drugs approved by Health Canada from 2008 to 2017, 33.4 per cent are listed on Quebec’s public formulary compared to 25.6 per cent in other provinces (on average).

In fact, Quebec’s public plan covers more than 8,000 prescription drugs, while Ontario’s Drug Benefit program covers 4,400.

Quebec also has faster approval times for new medicines compared to other provincial plans. Over the past 10 years, the average wait time for new drugs (between approval by Health Canada and coverage by the public plan) was 477 days in Quebec compared to 674 days in the other provinces.

Crucially, private insurers active in Quebec must provide coverage that is at least equivalent to that of the public plan, although private insurers usually provide expanded coverage to include drugs not covered by Quebec’s public plan.

The study also notes that Quebecers have greatly benefited from faster and easier access to new medicines in terms of health outcomes, and although drug costs have increased since the program was implemented in 1997, there has been a relative decrease in the use of other health services. In fact, Quebec has a lower level of total health spending per capita than in any other province in Canada.

While not perfect, Quebec’s mixed public-private pharmacare model proves that you don’t need a government-run, one-size-fits-all-provinces system to provide universal drug coverage to patients,” Labrie said.

With the issue of pharmacare front and centre, it’s crucial that policymakers—and all Canadians—are aware of Quebec’s pharmacare program.”


READ the Executive SummaryClick Here

READ the Full ReportClick Here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nurses Take Job Action After Years of NDP Neglect

Image Credit:  BC Nurses Union BC nurses have reached a breaking point after years of unsafe conditions, rising violence in the workplace and a government that wouldn’t listen. Now they are on the picket line fighting to be heard. Last week, nurses began job action with a 72-hour strike notice, refusing non-essential overtime and stepping back from non-nursing duties. As of Tuesday, they have escalated to picket lines for the first time in decades. This moment was avoidable. It is the result of years of unanswered concerns from the frontline workers who keep our hospitals running. Nurses have been raising the same concerns for years: unsafe staffing levels, rising violence on the job, and a workload no single person should have to carry. None of it is new, and none of it should have taken a strike vote to get the government's attention. "Nurses are exercising their legal right to job action, but it shouldn’t have had to come to this," said Kiel Giddens, MLA for...

British Columbians Still Don’t Know Who’s Paying for NDP’s BC Hydro Deal

The NDP is making billion-dollar promises with BC Hydro, but British Columbians still don’t know who will pay the bill. Last week’s memorandum of understanding isn’t what the federal government and the NDP are making it out to be. It’s an admission that the NDP failed to make the long-term investments needed to keep B.C. powered. Now British Columbians have serious questions about the cost and whether BC Hydro ratepayers will end up paying the price. David L. Williams, MLA for Salmon Arm-Shuswap and Shadow Minister for BC Hydro and Electrical Energy Development , said British Columbians deserve clear answers about the full implications of the Canada–British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement. “British Columbians deserve the full truth,” said Mr. Williams. “This multi-billion-dollar announcement does not answer who pays for cost overruns, who pays for new generation, who carries the risk if industrial customers do not materialize, or whether ratepayers will be forced ...

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...

Labels

Show more