Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN - While we work on a made-in-BC Wild Salmon strategy, we can already protect and restore habitat, and coordinate and streamline responsibility for wild salmon within the BC government


Today I want to pause and raise my hands in gratitude. I want to acknowledge the provincial and federal government's announcement on July 5th of the successful applicants to the Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund (SRIF). 

The SRIF is one result of our persistent work in raising the profile of the desperate plight of the wild Pacific salmon over the past 18 months.

This past Spring, I was honoured to stand on the podium next to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Hon. Jonathan Wilkinson, and British Columbia Premier John Horgan to announce the $142 million SRIF to support infrastructure, innovation and science partnerships for wild Pacific salmon.

At that point in time it was unclear what projects the two governments would end up funding. I and my BC Green Caucus colleagues consistently advocate for habitat to be the highest priority for investment. We put the premium on habitat protection. There are still many magnificent ecosystems that remain intact. So, we encourage our BC NDP government colleagues to make the choice to protect those areas.

While they may be forgoing future revenue, protection is the most cost-effective action government can take. They don't need this fund for that, all they need to do is change how they make the decision.

Restoring wild salmon habitat
When I was asked what type of projects I would like the SRIF funds to be invested in, my target was on restoration. There is a lot of information already available to government about where they can get the highest possible return on investment for their limited funds.

For example, a logging road, culvert, ditch or other natural or man-made impediment that, if repaired, will open up pristine wild salmon habitat. In fact, for many of these specific locations, the designs have already been drafted. They have just been waiting for the money.


Adam Olsen @AdamPOlsen on Twitter

To save #wildsalmon & #steelhead we need habitat protection, restoration and a government that is organized to rebuild our fisheries, not manage them into further decline. We need to start now. #bcpoli


The BC government remains stubbornly defensive of its current organizational structure - a structure organized to fail #wildsalmon & #steelhead. #bcpoli
1) Protect habitat
2) Restore habitat
3) Coordinate and streamline the responsibility for wild salmon within the BC gov't


Proud of the #CleanBC funding we secured in the budget but protecting nature is also key to ensuring a safe & healthy future. BCGreen caucus pushed for habitat protection, restoration & acquisition in budget 2019. Government failed to step up for #wildsalmon & #steelhead #bcpoli


While we work on a comprehensive made-in-BC #wildsalmon strategy we can start, immediately, to:
1) Protect habitat
2) Restore habitat
3) Coordinate and streamline the responsibility for wild salmon within the BC gov't#bcpoli

Every day for weeks, I tweeted out my priorities for salmon (just like the tweets above). I'm definitely pleased with the focus of the projects. I recognize and respect the need to fund many aspects of the fishery. However, it delights me that there is a heavy focus on habitat in this round of announcements. Wild salmon begin and end their lives in our rivers, creeks and streams and if those places are not welcoming to them then it does not matter how much we spend elsewhere.

Celebrating investment, shifting perspectives

Thank you to the Ministers and government staff that worked very hard to put the SRIF fund into motion. This is just the first of many announcements over the next five years that begin to address the challenges of the wild Pacific salmon. Throwing a small amount of money at the problem will not fix it though. So, my celebration is brief. While we have done good work there is little benefit in standing around and patting ourselves on the back. With that, my mind turns to the fact that we also require a monumental shift in perspective.

I've been tough on the provincial and federal governments in this blog with respect to our relationship with nature. The power of government is like a tsunami, it doesn't appear to be moving very quickly but it moves with incredible force. With this in mind, to halt the inertia of government and to change its direction requires a great deal of energy and political will.

It makes no sense to throw good money after bad.

Our work on salmon was the first step in a journey. Our work on water and forests is inextricably linked. We are starting to uncover a broad vision for how we can actually adapt to and mitigate the impact of global warming. It's a vision for a prosperous, resilient and sustainable British Columbia.

I will continue highlight it in this blog in the coming weeks and months. We have a long way to go but these announcements are important steps in the right direction.



Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands.

Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more