Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

OLSEN - PACE is an innovative financing tool for building owners and developers to upgrade energy performance, install renewable energy systems and reduce resource consumption with financing repaid through their property tax bill


There is a program in Alberta called P.A.C.E.

One of my constituents from Salt Spring Island initially brought this program to my attention back before the 2017 provincial election. He continues to encourage me to advocate for a similar program in British Columbia.

He's not alone in this endeavour.

First, what is P.A.C.E. you might ask?

It stands for Property Assessed Clean Energy. As the PACE Canada website describes it, PACE "is an innovative financing tool which building owners and developers can use to upgrade their building's energy performance, install renewable energy systems and reduce resource consumption with no money down and with the financing repaid through their property's tax bill."

We know that increasing building standards, for new construction, to improve the efficiency of our buildings will reduce emissions. However, there are a huge number of aging buildings that are super-inefficient and use a lot of energy.

Rather than knocking them all down and wasting those materials, we need to upgrade them. This is expensive and not everyone has access to the capital, nor can they personally carry the financial burden of mortgages on their property to fund the modernization.

How does PACE work?  If the idea of no up-front cost to the property owner sounds too good to be true, well it's not.

Essentially, the property carries debt not the owner. Whether it's supported by private funds, or a municipal finance authority like we have in British Columbia, it represents a tremendous untapped opportunity.

This short video “Pace Explained, from the Alberta government, provides a good description how it works.

It could unleash a frenzy of economic activity retrofitting buildings in British Columbia, while dramatically decreasing emissions in our cities, towns and villages -- and lowering the cost of living for people.

On June 27, 2019 the City of Port Moody wrote the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Hon. Selina Robinson encouraging her to investigate creating a similar program for British Columbians.

I've also brought this opportunity to the attention of both Minister Selina Robinson and Carole James, the Minister of Finance.

I'm hopeful that momentum will build under this idea. It is an excellent way to involve the public personally in climate change adaptation while generating positive economic activity. I will continue to work to raise the profile of this initiative at the upcoming Union of BC Municipalities convention and Fall legislative session.

It's time for a PACE program in British Columbia!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more