Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN FELDSTED -- Taxpayer funds to buy votes in major metropolitan centres -- meddling in provincial affairs


CBC NEWS: Ottawa to invest $1.3 billion in Blue line extension -- the investment corresponds to about a third of the expected total cost

CLICK HERE to read this story


It is hard to know where to begin with what is wrong with this announcement. For starters, it is just in time for the fall federal election.

Local infrastructure is a provincial jurisdiction. The federal government has no constitutional authority to spend money on local infrastructure unless:

  • The subway connects Quebec with another province or port; or
  • The subway is of benefit to two or more provinces; or
  • The subway can be declared of benefit to Canada as a whole.

Secondly, we have to look at populations and shares of cost. When sort through that:
  • The City of Montreal is putting up about $1.995 billion
  • Quebecers living outside of Montreal are putting up about $1.497 billion; and
  • Canadian living outside of Quebec are putting up about $1 billion.     

As a Manitoba resident I have a problem with subsidizing a subway in Montreal.

Budget 2016 committed $14.4 billion focused on accelerating federal investments in the short term by providing funding for the rehabilitation, repair, and modernization of existing public transit, green and social infrastructure. Additional funding was targeted towards post-secondary education and broadband access for remote communities.

Budget 2017 made an additional $81.2 billion of funding available across five priority infrastructure streams: public transit, green, social, trade and transportation, and rural and northern communities' infrastructure.

Our federal government has created two programs. The Smart Cities Challenge and the Canada Infrastructure Bank to manage about $96 billion in funding. It is apparent that the federal government wants to control which major infrastructure projects will be funded in cities and municipalities although this is a clearly a provincial jurisdiction.

To see how our funds are being spent, visit the Infrastructure Canada funding site.

$42.3 billion in funding covering 48,195 projects has been approved. That is a bit over 12% of our projected annual budget of $330 billion and we know very little about exactly where the funds have been spent. That is just over half of the funds currently allocated.      

Samuel de Champlain Bridge
$42.3 billion is a little more than double our annual federal deficits.

The spending is unconstitutional meddling in provincial jurisdictions that allows the federal government to make announcements and appear to be working for us.  We begin to understand how insidious and destructive this regime is.

It is unsurprising that two examples of Infrastructure Canada’s investments are in the $4 billion Samuel de Champlain Bridge connecting Montreal with her south shore commuter communities and now the $4.5 billion Montreal subway extension.

The federal government is unlawfully using taxpayer funds to buy votes in major metropolitan centres.

Federal preoccupation with meddling in provincial affairs to appear to be leading the nation instead of paying attention to its responsibilities has to end.   


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- If having three un-happy MLA’s leave the party, is what it takes to have unity within caucus, then I say, “Fine; let it be so”

Regrettably, in recent days, issues within the Conservative Party of BC have come to the surface resulting in one member being removed from Caucus (Dallas Brodie) and the party, and two others (Tara Armstrong and Jordan Kealy) leaving of their own accord. As of this morning (Saturday March 8th) all three are now sitting as independents in the BC legislature. So, what does that mean? In the last twenty-four hours social media feeds have lit up with support for leader John Rustad, while others have been negative, accusing the party, and Rustad, of being bullies and not standing up for conservative values. Ryan Painter, who has personally worked with John Rustad, had this to say: Since the beginning, he's had one target: the BC NDP. He knows that British Columbians deserve a government that works for them, delivers on their promises, and doesn't tax them into poverty. He believes in his team and the power of a focused opposition. He knows who the enemy is. He knows BC deserves ...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER: “Hopefully he’s actually listening to what people have to say, and not just showing up for a photo op”

In his latest travels across the province, BC Forest Minister Ravi Parmar touched down in the Okanagan. A trip essentially, he said, to be on the ground meeting industry people. I read what he had to say, and about how he has been tasked with getting more timber to market. Let me start by saying, “ He hasn’t been tasked. He and Premier Eby guaranteed 45 million cubic metres of available wood fibre – they guaranteed that .” BC Timber Sales is a government agency within the provincial forest’s ministry, which is responsible for managing a portion of the province's Crown timber; specifically, 20 percent of the province's annual allowable cut. Unfortunately, BC Timber Sales did not provide anywhere near that amount last year, it was just 12.2 percent. Three years ago, BC mills cut 52 million metres of wood, bringing in nearly $2 billion dollars to the provincial treasury. That figure doesn’t include the taxes from 55,700 people directly employed in the industry, nor from the tens o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conservative Opposition demonstrates focused and policy-oriented approach in first four weeks of the legislative session

In the first four weeks of the legislative session, the Conservative Official Opposition has scored significant policy wins as it proves every day that the Conservative team has fresh ideas and real-world experience to bring to the table. At the same time, the NDP government has been listless, struggling to find a policy agenda that addresses the problems that British Columbians are facing. “This NDP government led by David Eby has tried to do everything under the sun to distract from their disastrous fiscal record and the fact that they are utterly out of ideas,” said Conservative Opposition Leader John Rustad. “They’ve tried to use the U.S. President to deflect from their eye-popping $11 billion deficit, the worst business confidence in the country, and the fact that they’ve created almost zero private sector jobs. This is no way to run a province or an economy.” Since the legislative session started on February 18th with the Throne Speech, the opposition...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more