Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Apparently, some of the disruptive and law-breaking groups were ‘chilled’ by the belief that they were being spied on


I know I really should care --- and it is a slippery slope to be on because who knows what /who might be next (if in fact the allegations are actually true) --- however I’m sorry, and I really don’t give a crap!

According to a document released by the BC Civil Liberties Association yesterday (July 8th)...
The BCCLA complaint alleged that, contrary to sections 12 and 19 of the CSIS Act, CSIS was monitoring environmentalists who were opposed to the Northern Gateway Pipeline Proposal, and sharing this information with the National Energy Board (NEB) and petroleum industry companies.

The BCCLA further alleged that this spying activity was deterring individuals from associating with environmental groups and expressing their opinions and that this chilling effect interfered with the freedoms of expression and association as protected by Section 2 of the Charter. Specifically named in the complaints were Dogwood Initiative, ForestEthics Advocacy (now Stand.earth), Sierra Club BC, Leadnow.ca, and the #IdleNoMore movement. 

According to the BCCLA, they are ... arguing that the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC) report suggests that CSIS monitors environmentalists generally for “domain awareness” and that information on some individuals and groups is collected “incidentally”.iv We believe that this amounts to keeping tabs on peaceful environmental groups, which is not only unlawful under the CSIS Act, it suggests a bias in the spy agency that sees environmentalists as an inherent threat. 

Apparently, some of the groups were “chilled” by the belief that they were being spied on ... and that while SIRC acknowledged these concerns were reasonable based on the public information available ... it was ultimately found that these fears were unjustified based on the confidential evidence.

The groups noted above, along with many others, effectively ensured that the Northern Gateway Project would never see the light of day ... and continue to attempt to see the same for the Trans Mountain Pipeline Project.

Illegal protests ... road blockades ... chaining themselves to gates ... blockading equipment from going about legal business ... putting a halt to, and stopping, road construction ... and essentially costing BC, and Canada’s, resource sector billions upon billions of dollars --- along with loses in spin-off jobs --- expansion of supply companies --– loses in new manufacturing --- and billions in tax loses to all levels of government.

Full-time protesters, the Sierra Club, two faced First Nations service station owners ... Tiny House Warriors, #IdleNoMore, multiple layers and levels of First Nations governments often times at odds with each other, and a host of granola eating hippies and protest groups; all have had their way over and over again,  They have continuously broken the law with impunity, all the while trying to drive our resource industries into the ground.

If you were spied on, or kept tabs on, tough banana’s – I DON’T CARE. What I do care about however, is the safe environmentally sound production of Canadian resource industries --- including pipelines and oil and natural gas development.

The BC Civil Liberties are on the wrong side of this, and I feel confident the majority of British Columbians will agree.

On June 18th the Tiny House Warriors ... “responded to today’s official approval of the Trans Mountain Pipeline by insisting that it will never be built on Secwempemc land”.

These same so-called ‘warriors’ then go on to shower total disrespect to their elders:

“The fact that they have a few sellout Indian Act chiefs supporting their pipeline in no way legitimizes it. The salaries of these sellouts are directly paid by the Department of Indian Affairs and they have no right to speak for the people who are the rightful titleholders of the land.”

The elders and Chiefs ARE elected by First Nations people ... and because of this THEY DO have the right to speak for the people they are the leaders of.   

So, after all that, can we please simply lock up protesters breaking the law, and hold them in jail while they await trial on any number of charges that would and could apply.

It’s just my opinion, however it’s long past time for this to be done.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more