Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- We need less talk and more action ... we need more restraint and more political willingness to protect our watersheds.


Ben Parfitt's Narwhal article "Muddied Waters: how clearcut logging is driving a water crisis in B.C.’s interior", has been open in my web browser for a few weeks. I finally read it on my way home from my recent trip to the Comox Valley.

The story is about unsustainable logging practices in watersheds — specifically, watersheds that are providing communities across British Columbia with their drinking water. 

Parfitt's story revolves around the rapid decline of the water quality in Peachland. It opens with long-time resident Richard Smith's account of the pristine local water quality when he moved there in 1947. Over the past decade, the situation has changed - drastically. Now Peachland is on the hook for building a $24 million water treatment facility.

So how does immaculate water become a murky, turbid mess causing boil water advisories so quickly? As many in the story highlight, the problem is the forestry practices. Despite supposed provincial government protections for community drinking water sources going back to the 19th century, the Ministry of Forests ignored the long-standing advice and the forests around Peachland's watershed have been allowed to be devastated.

New Peachland reservoir waiting for
the concrete truck and pouring the
north wall of the upper reservoir
Increasing cost of unrestraint
A common theme in my work as an MLA and former municipal councillor is the growing infrastructure deficit - the inability for communities, and our province, to keep up with maintaining and repairing aging infrastructure and building new infrastructure. Now, Peachland, a town of 5,500 people is expending millions of dollars to build a facility to process water that nature was doing better.

Why? Because the provincial forestry policy has no restraint.

Timing is everything. Parfitt's story is a disturbing confirmation of the story I heard several times (in just a few days) in the Comox Valley. In November 2018, the province announced a $125 million water treatment facility to clean up turbid water from the valley's drinking water source, Comox Lake.

The Cumberland Community Forest initiative is working to protect the forests in the watersheds surrounding Cumberland, BC. Ironically, the forests they want to save from logging is the source of the drinking water for Courtenay and Comox but not Cumberland itself. Cumberland's water comes from another lake outside of the few hundred hectares they are fundraising to purchase.

However, they recognize that the entire watershed, forests, lakes, creeks, streams and rivers are all part of the same integrated system, a reality that is apparently lost on the provincial government.

Unfortunately, there seems to be little difference in approach on this issue between the former BC Liberals and current BC NDP governments.

Playing catch-up

Finally, it's important to put a little perspective on the costs of our decisions. While the federal and provincial politicians are scrambling to cut ribbons on more than $150 million dollars in announcements for unnecessary facilities saving two communities from poor resource management decisions by the forest ministry, other politicians are bristling with pride about a $142 million investment in protecting, enhancing and studying wild salmon across British Columbia.

Apparently, nobody is making the connection.

Like the ancient trees that move so many British Columbians, issues about forests and fish in British Columbia are some of the oldest and most complex of any issue we deal with. Frustrating factors around private and Crown land, tree-cutting licenses and stumpage rates make this an incredibly difficult policy area to navigate.

While the provincial government is engaging and consulting British Columbians about forestry policy, loggers and community activists are telling me what they told Parfitt.

We need less talk and more action.

We need more restraint and more political willingness to protect our watersheds.

Protecting drinking water should be a priority.

Had we taken the advice of our predecessors and actually put human health ahead of short-term profit, actually governing this province with a holistic understanding and respect for the ecosystems that sustain life, then perhaps we would not have to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to chase poor decisions. Hopefully, we are learning from our mistakes.

Comments

  1. Good column Adam. Preserve our natural forests and water courses and nature will take care of our water

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more