Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- We need less talk and more action ... we need more restraint and more political willingness to protect our watersheds.


Ben Parfitt's Narwhal article "Muddied Waters: how clearcut logging is driving a water crisis in B.C.’s interior", has been open in my web browser for a few weeks. I finally read it on my way home from my recent trip to the Comox Valley.

The story is about unsustainable logging practices in watersheds — specifically, watersheds that are providing communities across British Columbia with their drinking water. 

Parfitt's story revolves around the rapid decline of the water quality in Peachland. It opens with long-time resident Richard Smith's account of the pristine local water quality when he moved there in 1947. Over the past decade, the situation has changed - drastically. Now Peachland is on the hook for building a $24 million water treatment facility.

So how does immaculate water become a murky, turbid mess causing boil water advisories so quickly? As many in the story highlight, the problem is the forestry practices. Despite supposed provincial government protections for community drinking water sources going back to the 19th century, the Ministry of Forests ignored the long-standing advice and the forests around Peachland's watershed have been allowed to be devastated.

New Peachland reservoir waiting for
the concrete truck and pouring the
north wall of the upper reservoir
Increasing cost of unrestraint
A common theme in my work as an MLA and former municipal councillor is the growing infrastructure deficit - the inability for communities, and our province, to keep up with maintaining and repairing aging infrastructure and building new infrastructure. Now, Peachland, a town of 5,500 people is expending millions of dollars to build a facility to process water that nature was doing better.

Why? Because the provincial forestry policy has no restraint.

Timing is everything. Parfitt's story is a disturbing confirmation of the story I heard several times (in just a few days) in the Comox Valley. In November 2018, the province announced a $125 million water treatment facility to clean up turbid water from the valley's drinking water source, Comox Lake.

The Cumberland Community Forest initiative is working to protect the forests in the watersheds surrounding Cumberland, BC. Ironically, the forests they want to save from logging is the source of the drinking water for Courtenay and Comox but not Cumberland itself. Cumberland's water comes from another lake outside of the few hundred hectares they are fundraising to purchase.

However, they recognize that the entire watershed, forests, lakes, creeks, streams and rivers are all part of the same integrated system, a reality that is apparently lost on the provincial government.

Unfortunately, there seems to be little difference in approach on this issue between the former BC Liberals and current BC NDP governments.

Playing catch-up

Finally, it's important to put a little perspective on the costs of our decisions. While the federal and provincial politicians are scrambling to cut ribbons on more than $150 million dollars in announcements for unnecessary facilities saving two communities from poor resource management decisions by the forest ministry, other politicians are bristling with pride about a $142 million investment in protecting, enhancing and studying wild salmon across British Columbia.

Apparently, nobody is making the connection.

Like the ancient trees that move so many British Columbians, issues about forests and fish in British Columbia are some of the oldest and most complex of any issue we deal with. Frustrating factors around private and Crown land, tree-cutting licenses and stumpage rates make this an incredibly difficult policy area to navigate.

While the provincial government is engaging and consulting British Columbians about forestry policy, loggers and community activists are telling me what they told Parfitt.

We need less talk and more action.

We need more restraint and more political willingness to protect our watersheds.

Protecting drinking water should be a priority.

Had we taken the advice of our predecessors and actually put human health ahead of short-term profit, actually governing this province with a holistic understanding and respect for the ecosystems that sustain life, then perhaps we would not have to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to chase poor decisions. Hopefully, we are learning from our mistakes.

Comments

  1. Good column Adam. Preserve our natural forests and water courses and nature will take care of our water

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more