Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Weak laws preventing influence of elected representatives, the Lobbying Act, and a powerful PMO acting as an autocracy rather than a representative government has seriously eroded our democracy


Butts is back. Now the question is whether he can renew Trudeau, too
Campbell Clark ~~ Globe & Mail ~~ July 21, 2019

There can be no surprise in the fact that Prime Minister Trudeau’s best friend and former aide is returning as some kind of campaign adviser. It would have been a big surprise if Gerald Butts stayed away ...

... he was ever-present, a gut check alter ego for the PM – and so full of the Trudeau Liberal political project that it would be hard to imagine he could sit on the sidelines. Or that Mr. Trudeau wouldn’t be calling him.

... the fact that Mr. Butts is back on Team Trudeau after the SNC-Lavalin affair is a symbol of the big question the Liberals face: can Mr. Trudeau get past the sense of disillusionment and disappointment that many voters who once supported him seem to feel. Can Gerry Butts help Justin Trudeau get his mojo back?

CLICK HERE to read the full story


The only surprise is that anyone would think that Gerald Butts ever left the PMO. Butts (aka enforcer #1) resigned as Trudeau’s principle secretary in a tactical move during the height of the SNC-Lavalin controversy. Butts denied any impropriety and claimed he was leaving for the good of the government. His presence was drawing unwarranted criticism. It does not pass a smell test.

You can rest assured that retired Clerk of the Privy Council Michael Wernick (aka enforcer #2) is not far away. He has too much knowledge of where the skeletons are buried not to be kept on a short leash. The players have switched public roles, but the Trudeau PMO team has remained intact.

The Prime Ministers Office (PMO) of Justin Trudeau operates outside the constitution and parliament, not within the confines of our constitutional monarchy. The Liberal party has always ignored our governance framework, but so have all the other political parties. It is political party officials and their fundraisers who make deals with private enterprise and have created the web of corporate influence that most of us find repulsive.

Since we have no legislation to prohibit political party or corporate influence on the government of the day, its ministers or members of the opposition, the convoluted disaster that passes for parliament today is inevitable.

The Lobbying Act, passed in 1985 by the Mulroney government, is in conflict with the Parliament of Canada Act insofar as prohibitions against efforts to influence elected representatives are concerned.


It paved the way for the Airbus scandal and should have warned us against the dangers of this legislation. It has never worked in the interests of Canada and provided legal cover for SNC-Lavalin to engage in heavy lobbying of our government to avoid prosecution for bribery.

A combination of weak laws preventing influence of elected representatives, the Lobbying Act, and a powerful PMO acting as an autocracy rather than a representative government has seriously eroded our democracy. The shifts have been incremental, over three decades, and thus went unnoticed.

The chickens are now coming home to roost and we are not happy with the poop on the floor.

Butts needs a PMO devoid of accountability, compassion and ethics to accomplish his goals. We need to replace the PM, Butts, Tedford and Wernick with people who have integrity and take their responsibilities to the people seriously.

Governance from the Prime Ministers Office must end.

John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more