Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Weak laws preventing influence of elected representatives, the Lobbying Act, and a powerful PMO acting as an autocracy rather than a representative government has seriously eroded our democracy


Butts is back. Now the question is whether he can renew Trudeau, too
Campbell Clark ~~ Globe & Mail ~~ July 21, 2019

There can be no surprise in the fact that Prime Minister Trudeau’s best friend and former aide is returning as some kind of campaign adviser. It would have been a big surprise if Gerald Butts stayed away ...

... he was ever-present, a gut check alter ego for the PM – and so full of the Trudeau Liberal political project that it would be hard to imagine he could sit on the sidelines. Or that Mr. Trudeau wouldn’t be calling him.

... the fact that Mr. Butts is back on Team Trudeau after the SNC-Lavalin affair is a symbol of the big question the Liberals face: can Mr. Trudeau get past the sense of disillusionment and disappointment that many voters who once supported him seem to feel. Can Gerry Butts help Justin Trudeau get his mojo back?

CLICK HERE to read the full story


The only surprise is that anyone would think that Gerald Butts ever left the PMO. Butts (aka enforcer #1) resigned as Trudeau’s principle secretary in a tactical move during the height of the SNC-Lavalin controversy. Butts denied any impropriety and claimed he was leaving for the good of the government. His presence was drawing unwarranted criticism. It does not pass a smell test.

You can rest assured that retired Clerk of the Privy Council Michael Wernick (aka enforcer #2) is not far away. He has too much knowledge of where the skeletons are buried not to be kept on a short leash. The players have switched public roles, but the Trudeau PMO team has remained intact.

The Prime Ministers Office (PMO) of Justin Trudeau operates outside the constitution and parliament, not within the confines of our constitutional monarchy. The Liberal party has always ignored our governance framework, but so have all the other political parties. It is political party officials and their fundraisers who make deals with private enterprise and have created the web of corporate influence that most of us find repulsive.

Since we have no legislation to prohibit political party or corporate influence on the government of the day, its ministers or members of the opposition, the convoluted disaster that passes for parliament today is inevitable.

The Lobbying Act, passed in 1985 by the Mulroney government, is in conflict with the Parliament of Canada Act insofar as prohibitions against efforts to influence elected representatives are concerned.


It paved the way for the Airbus scandal and should have warned us against the dangers of this legislation. It has never worked in the interests of Canada and provided legal cover for SNC-Lavalin to engage in heavy lobbying of our government to avoid prosecution for bribery.

A combination of weak laws preventing influence of elected representatives, the Lobbying Act, and a powerful PMO acting as an autocracy rather than a representative government has seriously eroded our democracy. The shifts have been incremental, over three decades, and thus went unnoticed.

The chickens are now coming home to roost and we are not happy with the poop on the floor.

Butts needs a PMO devoid of accountability, compassion and ethics to accomplish his goals. We need to replace the PM, Butts, Tedford and Wernick with people who have integrity and take their responsibilities to the people seriously.

Governance from the Prime Ministers Office must end.

John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more