Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Getting our knickers in a knot over which available foods are healthiest is like sorting through a pirate chest of gold, silver and jewels trying to decide what we like best

Conservatives 'declaring war on Canada Food Guide' like they did on long-form census, Trudeau says -- Recently revamped guide is 'based on evidence, based on science, based on research,' PM says

Peter Zimonjic ~~ CBC News ~~ Jul 18, 2019


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is defending his government's update to the Canada Food Guide in the wake of attacks by Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer who suggested the changes were riddled with "bias" and driven by "ideology."

... Health Canada restructured the Food Guide in January, eliminating the emphasis on food groups and recommended servings. The new guide recommends eating protein that comes from plants more often as well topping up on "plenty of vegetables and fruits, whole grain foods and protein foods."

... "The process was flawed," Scheer said of the new guide. "Complete lack of consultation. Seems to be ideologically driven by people who have a philosophical perspective and a bias against certain types of healthy food products. So absolutely we want to get that right."
Most of us recognized revised Canada Food Guide as another attempt by the loony left to convince us that people are herbivores, not carnivores and continue to ignore it.

From an electability standpoint, this is a clanger. Scheer might as well have hung a “For Sale” sign around his neck. Making the announcement at a dairy cartel meeting does not pass the smell test. We wonder who else is on his favoured supporters list.

The Canada Health Food Guide is not on anyone’s list of issues that matter in choosing a leader and party to form the next government.

A few million of us recall when doctors endorsed filtered cigarettes as healthier for us and millions more have tried doctor recommended diets to make us lose weight and get healthier. Some did but tens of thousands regretted wasting their time and money on each fad diet.

We have such an abundance of food choices that we have the luxury of arguing over which items are healthier than others. We have no idea what real hunger or starvation is like. Our forefathers and most certainly our ancestors had no such luxury. They ate what was available and were glad of it.

We had great migrations of people from one area to another when droughts, locusts, volcanic eruptions or other factors caused famines and people faced the choice of relocation or starvation.

People forget that commercially available electric power in Canada did not exist before 1881 ... and widespread electricity availability did not occur until the 1920s, about a century ago. Prior to that we had no way to keep food from spoiling in the summer heat or having perishables freeze in the winter.

The debate is unwinnable.

Beef, cheese, eggs, fish, milk, mutton, pork and poultry have been part of our diets for centuries. None have proven to be toxic. If they were, many of us would not be here today.

Getting our knickers in a knot over which of the foods available are healthiest is like sorting through a pirate’s chest of gold, silver and jewels trying to decide what we like best.

The Canada Food Guide is another example of the federal government meddling in our lives instead of carrying out its duties and responsibilities. Governments do not know what is best for us and must stop pretending that they do. This focus on irrelevant minutia is maddening.


John Feldsted 

Comments

  1. Do you like chocolate milk?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes ... and chocolate bars ... and chocolate syrup, and chocolate pudding, and all the flavours of chocolate ice cream. Not sure what your point is??

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more