Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Is conservatism on the way out? Not, according to Merritt resident Michael Beauclair, the former BC Conservative Candidate in the Fraser Nicola riding



Today in the National Post, I saw a story written by Colby Cosh, entitled, “Is conservatism on the way out?

In part the writer stated:
Perhaps the secret of recent history in the provinces is that conservatives are not addressing psycho-semantic problems with the term “conservative.” How many times have you heard someone say, “I’m a social liberal but a conservative on economics”? This is the default political position of most adults now, is it not? Liberalism, which is to say pluralism, has won the argument in the “social” realm of government. What once was liberalism in economics, the dirigisme that my generation was taught to think of as the “mixed economy,” has largely lost; but the people who call themselves Liberals have succeeded at extricating themselves from the reputational burden …
 

I thought the story raised some interesting points on ‘conservatism’ as a whole,
Michael Beauclair
which is why I posted it to my Facebook page.  

It got a response from Michael Beauclair, the former BC Conservative Candidate
in the Fraser Nicola riding.  I thought he had some very valid points, and so I asked if he would let me use it as a guest post on my blog.  He said yes, and so here is what he had to say.



In my opinion, people across Canada are voting with their Hearts and not their Brains.



It seems to me that there is a percentage of Canadians who seem to think that the Government, and the Bank of Canada, should endlessly print more money to support dubious Social Programs (Refugee problem) while not recognizing that this practice debases our currency, and adds more Debt.



The Conservative outlook impresses the need for all government and citizens to live within their means.  Stephen Harper was going to cut our Federal Portion of income tax by 20%, with another 2% reduction to small business tax.  That measure would have definitely helped individuals, families, small business, and the overall economy.  I never saw the "Media Party" talk about this Conservative promise because, damn it, we needed CHANGE.




Ask yourself this question; “What federal government services do we really need?”  National Defense is Number 1 on my list, followed by money for Healthcare, Weights and Measures Canada (to ensure that every person and industry are on a level playing field when selling and trading Natural resources and business transactions; left wingers don't understand the importance of a government backed and enforced Standards).



I don't need to subsidize CBC, skating / ice arenas, and hockey associations with my tax dollars.  BUT, I do want to my tax dollars go into highway infrastructure since Canada is already 20 years behind.  I don't need to subsidize Syrian refugees and their healthcare costs- we have enough issues with our own Aboriginals and Land Claims to deal with.



Conservatives across Canada need to do a far better job in explaining, and leading by example, what true conservatism means … and values associated with that form Governance.  We need to put the Left leaning Media Party on notice, and tell them to return to what Freedom of the Press really means (this includes and means reporters and their respective companies).  They have the right to tell the truth about what’s really happening in news stories, and that means to be objective and impartial every time!



Is conservatism on the way out?  Not, according to Merritt resident Michael Beauclair, the former BC Conservative Candidate in the Fraser Nicola riding.  As noted above, he says "Conservatives across Canada need to do a far better job in explaining, and leading by example, what true conservatism means … and values associated with that form of Governance."

What do you have to say?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more