Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WHAT WILL HAPPEN if those revenue declines are even more severe?



Happy (?) New Year ... and from the "Just in case you missed it" files, news of what you'll be paying more for ...

As of January 1st Medical Services Plan (MSP) premiums increased by about 4 per cent, thanks to our BC Liberal government.  ON TOP OF THAT, MSP premium rates, paid by over half million couples, will increase by an additional $14 per month (on top of the above noted 4 per cent increase).

BUT THERE'S MORE ... Property Tax revenue is expected to grow by an average of 4.3 per cent during the next three years.

And of course there's the three we were already well aware of:
ICBC ... an average increase of 5%
Fortis ... increases by 2.76%
BC Hydro ... increases by 3.5%

The Carbon Tax was expected to increase annually by an average of 1.6 per cent per year, over the next three years.  Facing an election, and the heat the Federal Liberals were taking over the Carbon Tax, Christy Clarks BC Liberals decided against the increase. 

We should all be aware however that the Carbon Tax adds 6.7 cents for every litre of fuel to drive our vehicles ... and for something essential, like heating our homes, we get to pay $1.49 per gigajoule for natural gas. 

Those of course are costs we can actually see on our bills. 

We do however pay more for EVERYTHING necessary to live (food, clothing, appliances, footwear, outerwear, sporting goods etc etc) because all of those things require transportation, which requires fuel, which costs more, and whose added costs get passed on to us.

The BC Liberal government also acknowledges, in the 2016 / 17 Budget and Fiscal Plan, that personal income tax base revenue (excluding tax measures and accounting adjustments for prior years) is forecast to average 4.5 per cent annual growth over the next three years. And as if they weren't already taking enough from you, Provincial Sales Tax revenue growth is expected to average 4.3 per cent annually over the next three years.

Headed into an election in just four more months, the one thing you WON'T hear the government discussing is our Provincial Debt. 

During the current fiscal year, provincial debt will increase from $65.3 billion to $67.7 billion ... an increase of 2.4 BILLION!!!   And total provincial debt is projected to be $71.9 billion by 2018 /19.

Looking at the provincial governments own Budget and Fiscal Plan 2016 / 2017 is not for the faint of heart.  There are a number of things that could have a severe impact resulting in debt increasing by an even greater amount. 

So what does our BC government say could be major risks to their fiscal plan? Here's just two of them:


  1. impacts of the expiration of the 2006 Softwood Lumber Agreement between Canada and the United States.  And guess what, it's expired, and USA lumber producers are not happy about Canada's share of lumber used there. Our province (BC) has the largest number of lumber producing companies in Canada, making us the biggest target of countervailing duties that WILL BE imposed on us. 

    Anyone seeking the results of the last go-round with the US will find that ... "In the previous softwood dispute, the U.S. imposed duties totaling 27 per cent. It took five years of litigation by Canada at a cost of more than $100 million to have the duty reduced to zero. By that time, the U.S. had collected US$5.4 billion in duties. Only US$4.4 billion was returned"

    What does that mean for British Columbians?  In all likelihood it will result in reduced lumber production, job losses not just in the sawmills, but also losses for those in logging and trucking, and decreased revenues to the BC government

  2. the outcome of litigation, arbitrations, and negotiations with third parties, including the appeal of the Supreme Court of Canada decision on the teachers’ contract issue.  Well we already know how that's gone ... the BC government lost, and the first round of expenses are already being added up.  In mid-November last year, the Vancouver Sun suggested the government will likely have to hire hundreds of teachers and spend between $250 million and $300 million more each year on education

The 2016 / 17 Budget and Fiscal Plan has already acknowledged additional risks to the provinces finances because ...

... Natural gas royalties are expected to decline 15.2 per cent in 2016/17

... revenue from mineral tax, fees and miscellaneous mining receipts is expected to decrease 26.1 per cent in 2016/17

... Forests revenue is forecast to decline 2.5 per cent in 2016/17

WHAT WILL HAPPEN if those revenue declines are even more severe? 

Really, it's no wonder that the middle class taxpayer is being gouged more and more, due to the fiscal incompetence of the BC Liberal government.  The only thing scarier though is what would happen, to the BC economy, if the NDP took over the reins of power in May's general election.

I want to see a positive future for BC ... but it's honestly getting harder and harder.

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more