Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Football fans however, are going to see a sporting event -- they are not paying to see (or go to) a protest, or political rally




Regardless of who it was, that opposed what was happening, I agree it is hugely disrespectful.  Sporting events (and similar gatherings) are intended to be entertainment -- not political events, rallies, etc.  In my opinion, those attending, and who are likely in the majority, should not have to be have this kind of disrespect shoved in their face.

Political activism, in Canada, has a long and
proud history.People, and organizations,
however have been responsible to
a large degree for their own events

It's a free and democratic country, and these athletes are certainly welcome to hold an event, where the topic of discussion is clearly understood.  There is NO COMMONALITY however with where they are currently doing this (protesting). 

Instead, they are simply take advantage of who they are -- complete with puffed up egos perhaps? -- and having someone else foot the bill for marketing and promoting it.


There is no commonality; players are simply
being completely disrespectful of their fans.


News reporter, commentary writer, and Kamloops resident, DALE BASS, posed an interesting question to my thoughts:
"
What about when musicians sing protest songs?
Should they just stick to entertaining cover songs? Or when authors write books with protest themes? Are there two classes of entertainers?"

I like, and respect Dale, and the opinions and thoughts she presents.  She is one of the individuals that keeps my eyes open to alternatives.  In this case we are far apart however.

I believe what she present, and what is happening (and where), are totally different scenarios. Fans of athletes, entertainers, artists, etc,  know what they are getting, and what they are paying to see and hear.  Movie stars, musicians, writers etc have a particular branding attached to them.  People who agree can pay to see them in THAT ROLE. 

Football fans however, are going to see a sporting event; they are not paying to see (or go to) a protest, or political rally.

IF these players truly believe in what they are protesting, then they should simply hold their own event, publicized as such.  Don't hold fans of football, hostage, while they get someone else to pay for it.

Which is why I disagree with a comment (also made on social media regarding this story) by another Kamloops resident, John O'Fee.  John is well known in political circles here as a former School Trustee and Kamloops City Councilor, former IHA head, and as a candidate for the Liberal Party of Canada in the 2004 election.  He stated:

Then why do they play the national anthem? In reality it is part entertainment and part political. Teams represent geographic areas and many fans support a team despite few or any players actually coming from that area. Likewise, the medal counts at Olympics are done by nation. To suddenly pretend politics has no part of this is simplistic. Politicians of all stripes appear at sporting events to burnish their image....for Pence to walk out and make a statement like he did is a purely political and rehearsed strategy. He would have been disappointed if there were no protest because that would have messed up his script.

(1921) New York Yankees hold their caps over their 
hearts during a performance of the national anthem
(Credit: FPG/Getty Images)
Checking the History Channel website, as to why and how the anthem ended up part of sporting events, at least in the United States, can be found by clicking here:

To date, players disrespecting the flag of a nation, and it's national anthem, have mostly been isolated to the United States.  How long though , will it take before, it has more than a toe-hold in Canada? 

I personally had it shoved in my face, when an individual just a few seats from me (10 feet), disrespected our country.  He deliberately remained sitting (slouching actually) during the singing of Oh Canada at the Labour Day weekend Fall Fair Rodeo in Barriere just a month ago. 

Did this happen because they've seen others do it -- or was it simply a personal act based on their own belief?  I don't know, but I strongly disagree with them doing it. 

Before I close, let me be clear about one thing -- I DO NOT agree with the grandstanding being made by players / athletes ... or by politicians whatever their stripe.  Pence, Trump, and others are getting coverage in the media because of who they are. Every day people however are not. And I question whether the majority of them would agree with the grandstanding by the players, or by the politicians.

What thoughts do you have on the matter?  Do you agree or disagree?  The floors yours, and I'd love to hear from you!

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH: Without a strong local presence, there is NO reason for anyone to tune in to local(?) radio

LOCAL HOMETOWN RADIO IS DYING … and without serious measures put in place, it will likely never see the light of day again. For well over four decades, the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (CRTC) has presided over its’ demise, and for that I say, “Shame”. Without out a word to say enough was enough, the CRTC has allowed corporate Canada to buy up one radio station after the other, and then allowed them to slash staff to the point where some so-called local radio stations do nothing more than air programming that originates from communities well outside the region in which they are located. Case in point?   On CHNL* 610 in Kamloops, the morning show hosted by Vinnie and Randi, DOES NOT originate from Kamloops -- it doesn’t even originate here in BC. It’s a program that Stingray airs across multiple radio stations in Western Canada. It doesn’t end there. Not only are Vinnie and Rando doing mornings on CHNL, but they also show up on sister station Country 103 … and of course o...

Conservative Economic Team Responds to Urgent Industry Concerns

 " For far too long, the BC NDP has ignored the economic challenges facing British Columbians. Manufacturing jobs are vanishing, forestry is in decline, and private sector employment growth has stagnated. Meanwhile, affordability has worsened for both families and businesses. British Columbians deserve better, and we’re here to deliver real solutions to rebuild our economy and create jobs that support everyday working people and their families ." – Gavin Dew, MLA and Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economy, Development, and Innovation.   December 3, 2024, Vancouver, BC – The Conservative economic team met today with business leaders and stakeholders to tackle critical issues impacting British Columbia’s economy. Attended by 9 critics from the Conservative Caucus, this meeting was convened by MLA Gavin Dew – Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economic Development, and Innovation - as a direct response to an October 30th open letter from seven of the province’s largest industry associations. ...

WARD STAMER -- We need certainly in our markets, and certainly in our fibre supply, before we no longer have a forest industry in this province

Image Government of BC I think we all realize that the threat of Trump’s 25% tariff is like other provocative statements he’s made in the past. That said, we should have reason to be concerned. Tariffs don’t benefit anyone. A tariff of that magnitude – included on our own softwood lumber exports, will make things more expensive for Americans, and cause friction in the supply chain. If imposed, a twenty-five percent tariff will be equally detrimental to the citizens and economy of the United States, as well as the people of BC. There are two things, however, of equal concern to the threat of punitive tariffs by incoming U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. One is our antiquated stumpage fees. It is a legacy from decades ago, and one incapable of responding to changing market conditions. We need to revamp our stumpage system to better reflect market conditions, and our economic costs. Instead, a value-added tax system will be instantly responsive to current market conditions and will encou...

Labels

Show more