Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Our freedoms of belief, conscience expression, and thought are of little value if they do not lead to robust public debate on all issues relevant to our society


Political parties are intent on using pollsters, and focus groups, to measure the mood of the public and intently scrutinize results to see how it might affect policies they adopt.  Fair enough … governments and opposition parties are elected to serve the people, but with 338 elected members in the House of Commons, one would expect that they have a finger on the pulse of the public they serve.  However, we should be wary of political parties being heavily influenced by polling results, rather then listening to their representatives.

That leads to a second problem … risk aversion. Political parties are wary of any policy or political decision that might cost them support and votes. One group they are concerned with though are the voices of lobbyists and pressure groups – the ones that do not represent mainstream society. Their fear of minorities leads to risk aversion and increases paralysis. The reverse is also true as politicians seem to be serving the interests of minorities rather than the mainstream.

The third indicator is a universal fear of controversy, which leads to censorship; controversial issues are shunned. When Liberal backbencher Iqra Khalid tabled motion M-103 (the anti-islamophobia motion) many were surprised that the Liberal Party came out in full support.  The Motion was controversial and had stirred considerable debate in the media, and in public. As long as the motion was before the House of Commons, controversy would continue. By supporting the motion and getting it passed, the government effectively stifled debate and is under no obligation to act on the Motion. The Motion will now gather dust.

The same tactic was used to deal with pipeline construction. Energy East was choked off by the government continually raising the bar for construction approval. Eventually investors and contractors withdrew, tired of silly games and took billion in investments with them. Trans Mountain proved more difficult, so the government bought it.  Now it seems there is no visible plan for completing the extension, or for removing the regulatory chaos that led to frivolous law suits and legal chaos.     


The forth factor is a ‘them and us’ mentality, where copious energy and time is devoted to battling other political parties rather than serving the public. Governments are secretive, pretending that they are plotting again their opponents. They have forgotten that they are in the legislature, or parliament to represent Canadians, not to play war games with one another.   

Our freedoms of belief, conscience, expression and thought are of little value if they do not lead to robust public debate on all issues relevant to our society. No one, nor any group should be able to dominate debate and discussion of any issue.

That is of particular significance in our legislatures and parliament. Every MLA, MNA, MP and MPP must have a full voice in his or her party, and in the legislature or parliament they are elected to. That is why they are there … to represent the people who elected them, not to carry out the plans of the governing cabinet or party officials. They exist to guard against legislation which is not in the interests of all Canadians, and to offer better solutions to problems our governments face.

There can be no back-benchers in a democratic government. If we allow division of representatives, we fail democracy. Appointment to a cabinet post is not an appointment to power; it is an appointment to specific responsibility in governance along with the duties and accountability for that office.

Forming a government does not include a Royal prerogative. We took care of that nonsense 800 years ago with enactment of the Magna Carta.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

  1. garret seinenDecember 9, 2018 at 3:07 PM

    I only disagree with the 'Magna Carta' line. The nobility managed to get a meagre bit of power away from the king and to this day, we still work to pay a monarch. Our freedom is far from carrying the guarantees of our southern neighbours. That said, we have the ability to shrug off the chains, just not the determination.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Alan ForsethDecember 9, 2018 at 5:58 PM

    We still work to pay the government for sure -- and it's more and more every year. That's because the majority don't want to shrug off their chains -- or at least they don't understand and realize that the more they demand of government, the more they'll take from us in taxes and fees.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...
Post a Comment
Read more

Wildfire waste plan torched -- Forestry critic Stamer calls BC's wildfire salvage rate 'a failure'

Claims that BC is making progress salvaging wildfire-damaged timber are masking deeper problems in the forest sector, the province’s forestry critic says. Last week, BC’s Ministry of Forests said mills in the province processed more than one million cubic metres of wildfire chips in 2024-25, up from 500,000 cubic metres in 2023 and representing about seven per cent of all processed wood. Kamloops-North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer said those claims of progress ignore the reality that only a fraction of burned timber is being used ... CLICK HERE for the full story
Post a Comment
Read more

Claire Rattée: Safer Supply Rollback Confirms Government Ignored Warnings for Years

Conservative Critic for Mental Health & Addictions Claire Rattée As new witnessed-consumption rules for BC’s prescribed safer supply program takes effect December 30, Conservative Critic for Mental Health, Addictions and Housing Supports Claire Rattée says the change confirms the NDP government ignored years of warnings and allowed a failed policy experiment to continue long after its harms were clear. “ As of today, the NDP is quietly admitting what families, front-line workers, and the Opposition have been saying all along: handing out take-home opioids without supervision was reckles s,” said Rattée. “ The government is acting now because the consequences became impossible to deny .” The shift ends the widespread take-home model that was expanded during the pandemic and maintained long after concerns about diversion emerged. It follows leaked internal law-enforcement documents showing a significant proportion of prescribed opioids were being diverted, including thr...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more