Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FRANK LEONARD -- Need a Speech? Remember the '3s'


As we continue the first week of the Federal election campaign ... these are timely words from Frank Leonard, to those candidates on the campaign trail.



My chum Murray Coell and I were invited to a construction industry banquet, and mingled prior to finding our seats near the stage. 

We both picked up the program and I asked if he was bringing greetings from the Provincial Government as a Cabinet Minister.  He said ‘yes’ and I said I thought my role was to bring greetings as the Mayor of Saanich.  Yet Murray replied “I thought you’re the guest speaker.” 

This was news to me and while the program showed a spot for a guest speaker, no one was named.
Frank Leonard - remember the 3's

As the night progressed, we both stood up and waved when introduced and then Murray was called up to bring greetings.  Next they started to read a very familiar biography of the guest speaker and my brain went into high gear. 

Then, amid lots of smiles, pauses and compliments to the hosts for their fine work for the industry and the economy, I opened some ‘mental files’ and spoke of three topics before setting down twenty minutes later.

I don’t recommend arriving at a banquet without knowing your role but as I was a veteran politician at this point, I was able to pull together a speech on the fly. It was not as ad-hoc as you might think, however.

I subscribe to the theory that an audience can only remember three things, and will get bored if they think a speech has more than three parts.  So, whether I was at an all-candidates meeting, a little league dinner or a rather formal occasion such as this banquet, my speeches would follow the ‘rule of 3s’: tell them what you’re going to say; say it; and tell them what you said.

Tell them what you’re going to say – the introduction always thanks the introducer and thanks the hosts for their invite and the work throughout the year. Then I let them know I’m going to talk about three topics and list them fairly briefly.

Say it – then I work through the three topics and make them relevant to the audience.  If you haven’t answered the ‘so what’ question then you are just passing time and haven’t made your point.

Tell them what you said – ‘in summary’ is a good way to let folks know that the end is near, but you must really mean it.  Sum up the three topics, why they matter and repeat some Thank You’s.  And, make sure the last sentence has the content, tone and body language that says you’re done and invites applause.

The vast majority of my speeches followed this pattern but there were times when more content is required. 

These were Inaugural Meetings, ‘state of the city’ and annual meetings of an organization I was leading.  Yet I still found the discipline of the ‘3’s’ useful. 

I’d break it down to sections of what we’ve done, what we are doing and where we should go.  Then I’d break each section into three categories – such as public safety, infrastructure and finances.  Then I’d limit myself to three topics within each category.  Mix in lots of thank you's and kudos to others and hopefully your audience stayed awake and even remembered some of your ‘3s.’

Whether you are a rookie or a veteran – speaking from script, notes or memory – on the way up or on the way out – I’d strongly recommend this rule of ‘3s.’


Frank Leonard served roles as a Councillor and Mayor of Saanich -- and Chair of the Police Board from 1986 to 2014. He chaired the Municipal Finance Authority of BC, was President of the UBCM, and while in business, served as a Director of the BC Chamber of Commerce, and President of the Victoria Chamber of Commerce.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more