Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FRANK LEONARD -- Need a Speech? Remember the '3s'


As we continue the first week of the Federal election campaign ... these are timely words from Frank Leonard, to those candidates on the campaign trail.



My chum Murray Coell and I were invited to a construction industry banquet, and mingled prior to finding our seats near the stage. 

We both picked up the program and I asked if he was bringing greetings from the Provincial Government as a Cabinet Minister.  He said ‘yes’ and I said I thought my role was to bring greetings as the Mayor of Saanich.  Yet Murray replied “I thought you’re the guest speaker.” 

This was news to me and while the program showed a spot for a guest speaker, no one was named.
Frank Leonard - remember the 3's

As the night progressed, we both stood up and waved when introduced and then Murray was called up to bring greetings.  Next they started to read a very familiar biography of the guest speaker and my brain went into high gear. 

Then, amid lots of smiles, pauses and compliments to the hosts for their fine work for the industry and the economy, I opened some ‘mental files’ and spoke of three topics before setting down twenty minutes later.

I don’t recommend arriving at a banquet without knowing your role but as I was a veteran politician at this point, I was able to pull together a speech on the fly. It was not as ad-hoc as you might think, however.

I subscribe to the theory that an audience can only remember three things, and will get bored if they think a speech has more than three parts.  So, whether I was at an all-candidates meeting, a little league dinner or a rather formal occasion such as this banquet, my speeches would follow the ‘rule of 3s’: tell them what you’re going to say; say it; and tell them what you said.

Tell them what you’re going to say – the introduction always thanks the introducer and thanks the hosts for their invite and the work throughout the year. Then I let them know I’m going to talk about three topics and list them fairly briefly.

Say it – then I work through the three topics and make them relevant to the audience.  If you haven’t answered the ‘so what’ question then you are just passing time and haven’t made your point.

Tell them what you said – ‘in summary’ is a good way to let folks know that the end is near, but you must really mean it.  Sum up the three topics, why they matter and repeat some Thank You’s.  And, make sure the last sentence has the content, tone and body language that says you’re done and invites applause.

The vast majority of my speeches followed this pattern but there were times when more content is required. 

These were Inaugural Meetings, ‘state of the city’ and annual meetings of an organization I was leading.  Yet I still found the discipline of the ‘3’s’ useful. 

I’d break it down to sections of what we’ve done, what we are doing and where we should go.  Then I’d break each section into three categories – such as public safety, infrastructure and finances.  Then I’d limit myself to three topics within each category.  Mix in lots of thank you's and kudos to others and hopefully your audience stayed awake and even remembered some of your ‘3s.’

Whether you are a rookie or a veteran – speaking from script, notes or memory – on the way up or on the way out – I’d strongly recommend this rule of ‘3s.’


Frank Leonard served roles as a Councillor and Mayor of Saanich -- and Chair of the Police Board from 1986 to 2014. He chaired the Municipal Finance Authority of BC, was President of the UBCM, and while in business, served as a Director of the BC Chamber of Commerce, and President of the Victoria Chamber of Commerce.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more