I was standing at the self check-out at the grocery store the other day
thinking about an article I read a couple of
years back.
It featured a short video and transcript of Bill Gates making the case
for taxing the robots.
I noticed four check-out stations staffed by a single employee. On a
busy afternoon in the past, those four stations would need at least four
dedicated people and up to four more people diverted from the produce or
grocery departments to bag the items, to operate.
Automation has impacted up to (or at least) three jobs at that grocery
store and the market is trending toward losing more jobs, as I highlighted in a
blog post earlier this summer.
As an aside, with nearly 600 posts published on a variety of topics they
are all beginning to blur together. I got to that last paragraph and thought, hold
on, I’ve already written about this.
Almost.
Anyhow, back at it.
Gates makes an important contribution to the discussion, not only as the
disruptor investing in artificial intelligence and automation but also in
offering a potential solution. As I point out at the very end of my previous
post, disruption to the workforce will impact the revenue collected by income
tax and more people will be competing for fewer of those traditionally
available jobs.
Some of those displaced people will be employed by new, yet-to-be
created industries as happened during the mechanization process of the
industrial revolution. Others will need to transition to other work and so it
will ripple through the marketplace.
The robots: From mechanization to automation
There is a social and economic cost to automation and, as I have heard
time and again by folks in a variety of fields, there is a shortage of workers
in many jobs that serve our seniors and youth. In many instances, these
industries feature incredibly low wages.
As Gates points out, taxing the robots is a way to generate the revenue
to increase re-training opportunities and wages for student support staff,
early childhood educators and home care workers serving our elders, just to
name a few.
It is interesting that Gates does not expect business to solve the
issues they are creating by automating. Instead, he says, “the
inequity-solving part, absolutely governments got a big role to play there.”
Gates raised this point more than two years ago.
The sooner the provincial government takes control of their
responsibility to the public interest, and heeds his advice addressing the
situation, the better. It will help businesses make informed decisions about
if, how and when they will automate certain jobs ... and it has the potential
to generate revenue to improve services balancing the growing inequality in our
economy and society.
Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British
Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam
has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a
member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are
raising their two children, Silas and Ella.
Comments
Post a Comment