Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

OLSEN -- you are likely to hear confusing messages about “free, prior and informed consent” being a “veto” handed to Indigenous people; I hope to inoculate you from this virus


As we mark the 12th anniversary of the signing of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), we hear from Premier John Horgan that government will be introducing legislation this fall that formalizes the transformation of relationships with Indigenous people in British Columbia. A lot of credit needs to go to Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation, Hon. Scott Fraser and his team, for keeping this process moving.

This may sound like a big scary notion. The courts have ruled time and time again on Indigenous rights and yet governments have continued to ignore the court rulings and refused to change. This has created an environment of uncertainty, tension and conflict. No one is satisfied and a new path forward is necessary.

Furthermore, the status quo approach is simply not good enough. 


Indigenous people and communities continue to be marginalized, their rights are the same as they have always been and, until the upcoming fall session, the province’s approach has been to either outright ignore those rights or force Indigenous people and communities to fight and prove they exist. The result is a great deal of uncertainty created by lawsuits, stranded assets and wasted time and money.

Supporting the UNDRIP
The idea that we simply agree with the UNDRIP, and that we should follow it, has been met with fear-mongering. I would like to reiterate my support for the process to develop the 40+ articles which outline the most basic expectations of how we would wish to be treated and we should be treating each other.

The process and work that created the UNDRIP is a positive example of deliberative democracy, inclusive of Indigenous perspectives, and it was decades in the making with broad international acceptance.

This fall you are likely to hear confusing messages about “free, prior and informed consent” being a “veto” handed to Indigenous people. I hope to inoculate you from this virus.

Adopting the UNDRIP as a piece of legislation extends no new rights. All the rights that are considered in this document already exist. They are rights our government has wrongly denied Indigenous people. As the Premier is clear in his statement they are “inherent rights.”

Canadian judges have been ruling on issues relating to “consent” since Indigenous people were finally allowed to secure a lawyer to defend themselves in the 1950’s.

Free, prior and informed consent
It’s been a slow-moving process. In our modern society, on a variety of fronts, we have been clarifying our expectations on consensual relationships and interactions.

To be clear, “free, prior and informed consent” is NOT a “veto.”

It’s a process that is inclusive of Indigenous people from the very beginning. All the outcomes (yes, no, maybe) are available, but it is a consensual and collaborative process.

We get there together.

A veto would be giving the power to a specific group stop an initiative once the process is complete and a decision is made.

These are important distinctions. For those who benefit from the status quo they may wish to keep things as they are, but with respect to the broad public interest it is important that we embrace the change. There is no doubt that the work ahead is going to be challenging and there are many obstacles that we must overcome. We must do so with kindness, compassion and love.

I believe we will be much more powerful when we recognize the complexity we have inherited. A lot has been done that needs to be undone and I’m thrilled that we are the first province in Canada with the courage to accept the challenge!


Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more