Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

OLSEN -- It was difficult to stand on the partially deconstructed home in central Vancouver and not think about all the houses that have been landfilled


Over the past several months, I’ve been clear about my concerns with the continued logging of high productivity old-growth. This past Spring, the BC Green Caucus called for a moratorium on logging old-growth hot-spots on Vancouver Island as an initial step.

I think it is important to clarify, though, that there is some old-growth that I fully support harvesting. Much of it is hiding in plain sight in the fully-developed urban landscapes of Metro Vancouver and Greater Victoria.


I am talking about the beautifully preserved old-growth found in many homes built before the 1970’s.   Each year however, more than 1000 such homes are demolished in these communities.

While the City of Vancouver has begun to implement regulations requiring a modest amount of recycling, a vast majority of the material from these homes end up in the landfill. That’s right, not only are we clear-cutting old-growth at unsustainable rates, we are also allowing beautiful old-growth lumber to be demolished and either thrown in a landfill or ground up and used as fuel in an industrial plant.

Though I probably don’t need to clarify this point, this is incredibly wasteful and completely unnecessary. It’s actually unconscionable.


While visiting Vancouver recently, Adam Corneil of the Unbuilders gave me a tour of one of his job sites and highlighted another option that not only is good for the environment but also has social and economic benefits.

Rather than demolishing these homes, Corneil and his team of tradespeople deconstruct houses, layer-by-layer, offering tremendous triple-bottom-line advantages for the property-owner and local governments.

As our landfills near capacity, we must aggressively divert material, especially if it’s not trash!

One quick look at the stack of rough-sawn fir milled from giants several hundred years old confirms they are far from trash.

Deconstruction is the right thing to do!

Once re-harvested, the wood is donated to Habitat for Humanity which then gives the property owner a tax receipt that offsets the cost of the deconstruction. Habitat for Humanity then sells the lumber and uses the revenue to build affordable housing. It’s a beautiful thing! With the federal and provincial tax credits in hand, property-owners not only take pride in their contribution to a wonderful cause but they are also rewarded financially.

It was difficult to stand on the partially deconstructed home in central Vancouver and not think about all the houses that have been landfilled -- and to think that not even 10% of the homes scheduled to be replaced this year will be deconstructed and diverted.


We are still dumping them into landfills at astonishing rates.

As regional governments look to find ways to preserve precious space in their landfills, diverting this material seems like one obvious solution. I believe we need more strict regulations on demolitions and deconstructions. Furthermore, there is likely more that the provincial and federal governments can do to support local governments with appropriate incentives.

There is a tonne of opportunity, and so I am thankful Corneil and his team are investing in exploring the potential.  Now, I hope that all levels of government will step in to ensure we are not needlessly wasting valuable old-growth lumber and filling landfills because. 

As it stands right now, that’s exactly what we are doing.


Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more