Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

OLSEN -- It was difficult to stand on the partially deconstructed home in central Vancouver and not think about all the houses that have been landfilled


Over the past several months, I’ve been clear about my concerns with the continued logging of high productivity old-growth. This past Spring, the BC Green Caucus called for a moratorium on logging old-growth hot-spots on Vancouver Island as an initial step.

I think it is important to clarify, though, that there is some old-growth that I fully support harvesting. Much of it is hiding in plain sight in the fully-developed urban landscapes of Metro Vancouver and Greater Victoria.


I am talking about the beautifully preserved old-growth found in many homes built before the 1970’s.   Each year however, more than 1000 such homes are demolished in these communities.

While the City of Vancouver has begun to implement regulations requiring a modest amount of recycling, a vast majority of the material from these homes end up in the landfill. That’s right, not only are we clear-cutting old-growth at unsustainable rates, we are also allowing beautiful old-growth lumber to be demolished and either thrown in a landfill or ground up and used as fuel in an industrial plant.

Though I probably don’t need to clarify this point, this is incredibly wasteful and completely unnecessary. It’s actually unconscionable.


While visiting Vancouver recently, Adam Corneil of the Unbuilders gave me a tour of one of his job sites and highlighted another option that not only is good for the environment but also has social and economic benefits.

Rather than demolishing these homes, Corneil and his team of tradespeople deconstruct houses, layer-by-layer, offering tremendous triple-bottom-line advantages for the property-owner and local governments.

As our landfills near capacity, we must aggressively divert material, especially if it’s not trash!

One quick look at the stack of rough-sawn fir milled from giants several hundred years old confirms they are far from trash.

Deconstruction is the right thing to do!

Once re-harvested, the wood is donated to Habitat for Humanity which then gives the property owner a tax receipt that offsets the cost of the deconstruction. Habitat for Humanity then sells the lumber and uses the revenue to build affordable housing. It’s a beautiful thing! With the federal and provincial tax credits in hand, property-owners not only take pride in their contribution to a wonderful cause but they are also rewarded financially.

It was difficult to stand on the partially deconstructed home in central Vancouver and not think about all the houses that have been landfilled -- and to think that not even 10% of the homes scheduled to be replaced this year will be deconstructed and diverted.


We are still dumping them into landfills at astonishing rates.

As regional governments look to find ways to preserve precious space in their landfills, diverting this material seems like one obvious solution. I believe we need more strict regulations on demolitions and deconstructions. Furthermore, there is likely more that the provincial and federal governments can do to support local governments with appropriate incentives.

There is a tonne of opportunity, and so I am thankful Corneil and his team are investing in exploring the potential.  Now, I hope that all levels of government will step in to ensure we are not needlessly wasting valuable old-growth lumber and filling landfills because. 

As it stands right now, that’s exactly what we are doing.


Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more