Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED - Governments must never be allowed to dictate our beliefs, or to censor our opinions


One of the most self-serving and useless concepts political parties have thrust on us is the notion that they invented diversity.

We are, first and always Canadians. Colour, ethnicity, gender, language, marital status, race and religion are not what identifies us. Single people have family, friends and acquaintances so are part of a family, a community, a province and a nation. Everyone fits in in one way or another.

The notion that we were not a diverse people during our formative years is ridiculous. Even a cursory examination of our history indicates our diversity; we are humans and follow natural instincts of forgotten millennia.

Males and females seek out one another and thousands of books have been written about lovers who were kept apart by tribal traditions. Thousand more books have been written about lovers who defied traditions and lived long lives together supporting one another.

We have accepted lovers of the same sex. Same sex attraction is as old as dirt. Discrimination against gays was a government initiative. It was governments that purged their ranks of gay employees as a “security threat”. Larger society followed suit. Watching politicians prance at the front of a gay pride makes me ill. If it was not for their blind discrimination the gay parades would not have been necessary.   

Some people suffer under delusions that they are better than others and that their religious and social beliefs are worthy of thrusting on others. That is where democracy and society begin to break down. Governments must never be allowed to dictate our beliefs or to censor our opinions.

Identifying minority groups in need of special recognition and support is a wrong-headed attempt to atone for decades of bigotry by the majority. Minority groups don’t want to be singled out; all they ask for is an equal opportunity.

We have decades of evidence that given equal opportunity, minority members thrive. They take their place in every part of our society and some become noteworthy leaders. They are no different from the rest of our society, ranging from the indolent and indifferent to the superior and outstanding. No tribe within the tribes has distinct advantages.

When I was a youngster, people understood the value of a tribe. Our tribe was the community we lived in. We understood that we were interdependent. The safety, security and well being of the community was far more important than our individual independence. We understood that we had an obligation and responsibility to our neighbours.

Our differences, our diversity, was not considered important.

If we faced wildfires, floods or storms we worked together to face the threat and restore what we could. If a church burned, another denomination would offer its facilities so members of another faith could still worship. The differences in belief were overridden by the welfare of the community.

Over the decades I have watched the value of family and community erode and we are poorer as a society. We are still tribal people and efforts to break away from the tribe have replaced the security of community responsibility with the angst of going it alone without the family and community support that keeps us grounded and props us up when the sledding is rough.

Political parties and governments have spent billions on convincing us that they can manage our lives better than we can -- which is absolute rubbish. Go back and  give us equality of opportunity. Governments must pay attention to their constitutional responsibilities and get out of our personal lives.

Social engineering by governments is as welcome as a skunk at a backyard Bar-B-Que.

Political parties, federal and provincial, keep telling us that they are determined to fight poverty. That is an outright lie as they would be fighting themselves.

All they need to do is to stop taxing the poor. Stop charging anyone with an annual income of $20,000 or less GST, PST, EI contributions, CPP contributions and income tax. Watch welfare roles diminish, and people given the opportunity to use their meagre incomes to advantage move up the income scale and contribute to our society.

Banish Human Rights Tribunals and rewrite human rights legislation to ensure the rights of an accused meet the principles of fundamental justice.

“Human rights tribunals” have become a playground for the perpetually offended which is the opposite of our need to reinstate the family, community and national patriotism that built this country from a wilderness into a G-7 nation.

We spent a century of progress despite our governments followed by 50 years of deterioration when governments became too powerful to fear the electorate. We need to fix that.


The Way I See It ~~ John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more