Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WHERE ARE THE financial resources for providing direct assistance to students in need of support for depression, stress, and anxiety, along with other mental health issues?


On Wednesday Judy Darcy, the Minister responsible for Mental Health and Addictions, announced schools in British Columbia will now have access to enhanced wellness supports and programs with $8.87 million being invested over the next three years.

 “Students need a safe place to say, ‘I’m not ok’, whether they’re struggling with anxiety or depression or any mental health issue”, said Darcy.

“This investment will help provide students, parents and educators with the tools they need to support mental well-being for students across BC for years to come.”

Funding will be used to provide individual grants to all 60 school districts, as well as independent schools, to help them better support mental health for all children and for those with substance-use challenges.

While I agree fully with the need for resources to help students with mental health issues, such as anxiety, stress, and depression, can our NDP government truly say this financial injection will indeed ... support mental well-being for students across BC for years to come.

According to a news story in the Vancouver Sun on August 26th, there are 1,578 public schools in the province, as well as 364 independent schools – that comes to just under two thousand schools -- 1,942.

BC’s Education Minister Rob Fleming indicated that, “We know there is a gap in student success for those who struggle with mental health challenges in BC”.

“With this funding, we want to ensure all students – no matter where they live or the size of their school – are able to get the quality help they need, when they need it”, he continued.

Again, I fully agree with the need for the resources to provide supports for students with mental health issues, but how can this possibly be enough to really and truly do the job?

The funding announcement of $8.87 million dollars is for a three-year period – that means $2.956 million per year.

As noted by the Vancouver Sun, there are 1,942 public and private schools in the province – which means that if EACH SCHOOL received an equal portion of that funding, it would amount to just $1,500 per year.

That $1,500 per year, per school, is then to be used to ... focus on initiatives related to mental health literacy, programs and supports ... to ensure planning of all activities are culturally safe and meet the needs of Indigenous youth ... to support the professional development of educators ... and for engagement with school leadership organizations, partner organizations, families and students.

NOT ONLY THAT HOWEVER, according to Wednesday’s government media release, those funds will also be required to help support the 2020 School Community Mental Health Conference in Vancouver. 

This conference is to bring together approximately 500 representatives of public, independent and First Nations schools, police, health authorities, and child and youth mental health workers, who are focused on improving mental health and addictions services for all BC students. 

All of this in an expensive city where accommodations, meeting space, meals, travel requirements, and more will eat up tens of thousands of dollars.

Training ... conferences ... programs ... supports ... 

BUT WHERE ARE THE financial resources for providing direct assistance to the students in need of support for depression, stress, and anxiety, along with other mental health issues?
That is certainly where the money should be going, however there is no possible way that $1,500 per school can possibly do what Darcy and Fleming are indicating will happen – it just can’t be done.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more