Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WHERE ARE THE financial resources for providing direct assistance to students in need of support for depression, stress, and anxiety, along with other mental health issues?


On Wednesday Judy Darcy, the Minister responsible for Mental Health and Addictions, announced schools in British Columbia will now have access to enhanced wellness supports and programs with $8.87 million being invested over the next three years.

 “Students need a safe place to say, ‘I’m not ok’, whether they’re struggling with anxiety or depression or any mental health issue”, said Darcy.

This investment will help provide students, parents and educators with the tools they need to support mental well-being for students across BC for years to come.”

Funding will be used to provide individual grants to all 60 school districts, as well as independent schools, to help them better support mental health for all children and for those with substance-use challenges.

While I agree fully with the need for resources to help students with mental health issues, such as anxiety, stress, and depression, can our NDP government truly say this financial injection will indeed ... support mental well-being for students across BC for years to come.

According to a news story in the Vancouver Sun on August 26th, there are 1,578 public schools in the province, as well as 364 independent schools – that comes to just under two thousand schools -- 1,942.

BC’s Education Minister Rob Fleming indicated that, “We know there is a gap in student success for those who struggle with mental health challenges in BC”.

With this funding, we want to ensure all students – no matter where they live or the size of their school – are able to get the quality help they need, when they need it”, he continued.

Again, I fully agree with the need for the resources to provide supports for students with mental health issues, but how can this possibly be enough to really and truly do the job?

The funding announcement of $8.87 million dollars is for a three-year period – that means $2.956 million per year.

As noted by the Vancouver Sun, there are 1,942 public and private schools in the province – which means that if EACH SCHOOL received an equal portion of that funding, it would amount to just $1,500 per year.

That $1,500 per year, per school, is then to be used to ... focus on initiatives related to mental health literacy, programs and supports ... to ensure planning of all activities are culturally safe and meet the needs of Indigenous youth ... to support the professional development of educators ... and for engagement with school leadership organizations, partner organizations, families and students.

NOT ONLY THAT HOWEVER, according to Wednesday’s government media release, those funds will also be required to help support the 2020 School Community Mental Health Conference in Vancouver. 

This conference is to bring together approximately 500 representatives of public, independent and First Nations schools, police, health authorities, and child and youth mental health workers, who are focused on improving mental health and addictions services for all BC students. 

All of this in an expensive city where accommodations, meeting space, meals, travel requirements, and more will eat up tens of thousands of dollars.

Training ... conferences ... programs ... supports ... 

BUT WHERE ARE THE financial resources for providing direct assistance to the students in need of support for depression, stress, and anxiety, along with other mental health issues?
That is certainly where the money should be going, however there is no possible way that $1,500 per school can possibly do what Darcy and Fleming are indicating will happen – it just can’t be done.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more