Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WHERE ARE THE financial resources for providing direct assistance to students in need of support for depression, stress, and anxiety, along with other mental health issues?


On Wednesday Judy Darcy, the Minister responsible for Mental Health and Addictions, announced schools in British Columbia will now have access to enhanced wellness supports and programs with $8.87 million being invested over the next three years.

 “Students need a safe place to say, ‘I’m not ok’, whether they’re struggling with anxiety or depression or any mental health issue”, said Darcy.

“This investment will help provide students, parents and educators with the tools they need to support mental well-being for students across BC for years to come.”

Funding will be used to provide individual grants to all 60 school districts, as well as independent schools, to help them better support mental health for all children and for those with substance-use challenges.

While I agree fully with the need for resources to help students with mental health issues, such as anxiety, stress, and depression, can our NDP government truly say this financial injection will indeed ... support mental well-being for students across BC for years to come.

According to a news story in the Vancouver Sun on August 26th, there are 1,578 public schools in the province, as well as 364 independent schools – that comes to just under two thousand schools -- 1,942.

BC’s Education Minister Rob Fleming indicated that, “We know there is a gap in student success for those who struggle with mental health challenges in BC”.

“With this funding, we want to ensure all students – no matter where they live or the size of their school – are able to get the quality help they need, when they need it”, he continued.

Again, I fully agree with the need for the resources to provide supports for students with mental health issues, but how can this possibly be enough to really and truly do the job?

The funding announcement of $8.87 million dollars is for a three-year period – that means $2.956 million per year.

As noted by the Vancouver Sun, there are 1,942 public and private schools in the province – which means that if EACH SCHOOL received an equal portion of that funding, it would amount to just $1,500 per year.

That $1,500 per year, per school, is then to be used to ... focus on initiatives related to mental health literacy, programs and supports ... to ensure planning of all activities are culturally safe and meet the needs of Indigenous youth ... to support the professional development of educators ... and for engagement with school leadership organizations, partner organizations, families and students.

NOT ONLY THAT HOWEVER, according to Wednesday’s government media release, those funds will also be required to help support the 2020 School Community Mental Health Conference in Vancouver. 

This conference is to bring together approximately 500 representatives of public, independent and First Nations schools, police, health authorities, and child and youth mental health workers, who are focused on improving mental health and addictions services for all BC students. 

All of this in an expensive city where accommodations, meeting space, meals, travel requirements, and more will eat up tens of thousands of dollars.

Training ... conferences ... programs ... supports ... 

BUT WHERE ARE THE financial resources for providing direct assistance to the students in need of support for depression, stress, and anxiety, along with other mental health issues?
That is certainly where the money should be going, however there is no possible way that $1,500 per school can possibly do what Darcy and Fleming are indicating will happen – it just can’t be done.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more