Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ROTHENBURGER -- Most stayed clear of the China reception, and I applaud them for it. It would have been even better if 150 more of them had stayed away


POSTED with permission of the author

THE CONTROVERSIAL Chinese Consulate-General’s reception for Union of B.C. Municipalities delegates on Wednesday evening (Sept. 25, 2019) in Vancouver was a fine media event but, otherwise, it wasn’t much of an event at all.

The issue with the reception is that China has not been a friend to Canada lately, detaining two Canadian citizens and pulling stunts with bans on Canadian goods in clear retribution for Canada’s detention of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou at the request of the U.S.
 
IMAGE by Mel Rothenburger
I would have boycotted the reception along with a lot of others but, out of curiosity, decided to briefly drop in to get a feel for the room, which at past UBCM conventions has been jam-packed with delegates. Outside the front door of the Waterfront Hotel, several media and some delegates and Chinese-Canadian citizens calling for a boycott of the reception mingled as protest placards were handed out.

Say NO to China money,” said one placard. “Release the Michaels,” said another, in reference to Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor being detained in China.

Protest chants drove the point home. Port Coquitlam Mayor Brad West, who has led the charge against the China sponsorship, was busy with media interviews.


Inside the reception room, Consul General Tong Xiaoling was giving a lengthy welcome speech reciting statistic after statistic about the value of trade between Canada and China. About 150 people, including delegates and consulate staff, applauded politely when she finished.

Kamloops Councillor and 2018 / 19 UBCM
Pres. Arjun Singh
(Image: Mel Rothenburger)
Then it was Councillor Arjun Singh’s turn. In one of the final acts of his one-year term as UBCM president, Singh kept it short. About two sentences short, in fact, saying it was important to work together “even during difficult times.”

This was nothing like the gala atmosphere painted in descriptions by media of previous receptions held by the consulate. The room was small, perhaps in expectation of an underwhelming turnout.

After his turn at the microphone, Singh faced a scrum with television reporters, explaining that the matter of accepting sponsorships of UBCM convention events from governments has been referred to a panel for consideration.

It was the best he could do on this thorny issue; his job is to reflect the wishes of an entire province of City councils and regional districts, not to take sides.

After about 10 minutes, without sampling the appetizers, drinking the wine, or accepting the swag bag that was offered to departing delegates, I left. By the time I got back to the front door of the hotel, the ‘protest’ had melted away, the media having gotten their video clips.

I saw a Global News reporter proclaim the China sponsorship issue was the big thing of the day at the convention ... Hardly.

This convention has a ton of other business — including a couple of hundred resolutions — to work through. The China issue was important, and the media will weave their magic around the reception issue, but the event itself turned out to be a nothing burger.

There are around a thousand delegates here, most of whom stayed clear of the China reception, and I applaud them for it. It would have been even better if 150 more of them had stayed away. It will probably be the last one, anyway.

Earlier in the day, delegates voted heavily during a resolutions session to ditch future sponsorships by governments. In a non-binding electronic vote, 44.9 percent indicated they “strongly disagree” with continuing such sponsorships, and another 19 per cent “disagreed.”

The panel reviewing the sponsorship question will, no doubt, take that result under strong advisement.


Mel Rothenburger is a regional district delegate at the annual UBCM convention in Vancouver. He is a former mayor of Kamloops and newspaper editor. He publishes the Armchair Mayor opinion website, and is a director on the Thompson-Nicola Regional District board. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more