Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- We should be protected by journalistic integrity, but it has left the building ... and there is no way to police the internet

CBC's chat bot helps you spot 'fake news'
     
This piece arrived in my mailbox this morning, and started my day with a long, loud laugh. There is some irony in having the dean of political bias, innuendo and opinion masquerading as news creating a program (bot) to ferret out ‘fake news’.
     

You cannot replace journalistic integrity with a computer program. Balanced and fair reporting of events is difficult. Fact-checking is time consuming and has been largely ignored in our 7/24 news cycle where getting the story out first is more important than getting the story right.
     
“Breaking news” is always suspect, no matter what the source. It is first impressions news, unchecked and unverified. Within hours, breaking news stories are updated to correct obvious errors. If you are reading news on-line, check the story date and you will often see an initial date followed by an updated date. In some cases, new information comes to light and the original story is replaced with a new headline. The story is basically the same but now includes the new information.
     

If you only read and possibly passed on the original breaking news story, within days, you can find that your information is incomplete and has inaccuracies.
     
E-mail has developed into an electronic version of a back-fence community gossip vehicle. I get a lot of e-mail due to my writing. Mail recipients send me items of interest for possible publication. In the flurry are messages I have checked and found to be dishonest. I will get two or three of these in a short period and then a month or two later get another batch of the same e-mail content.
     
People receive an e-mail, usually forwarded to them by a friend, find the content interesting and pass it on to their friends which occasionally include me. One of my rules that I do my best to keep is to seek verification before publishing.

I want a second source to verify content. I often turn to “Snopes”, which has a catalogue of e-mails being circulated and an indication of whether they are real or fakes. If there is nothing on Snopes, I use search engines to seek news on key phrases in the e-mail. If that proves unsuccessful, I can safely ignore the content as bogus.
     
Our best defence against fraudulent news is a suspicious mind and common sense. Is the content of this story plausible?

One of my favourite fake news e-mails is about our government deciding to issue Canada Pension cheques as “benefits” which got many people hot and bothered as they have paid into the Canada Pension Plan for decades and payments are not government “benefits”. It turns out that the e-mail originated in the United States.

Some clown decided to adapt it to Canada and sent it out to his or her friends, who sent it out to their friends without anyone checking to see if the information was valid. In Canada, Old Age Security and the Guaranteed Income Supplement are paid out of the general revenues of the federal government and are true government benefits, but Canada Pension, which requires premium payments from employees and employers by law, is not.
     
We are inundated with news – far more news content than we can be reasonably expected to deal with. We should be protected by journalistic integrity, but it has left the building ... and there is no way to police the internet. Anyone can create a web page or e-mail materials that are plain trash.

I recall reading a story on global warming by a university professor, who was now retired and living in Canada, that looked suspicious. I tracked him down and found that he is still with a mid-western US university, and had no idea that he had allegedly published a paper on global warming.
     
Skeptic that I am, I will not employ the “chat bot”. I prefer to trust my instincts and common sense.


The Way I See It ~~ John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more