Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- We should be protected by journalistic integrity, but it has left the building ... and there is no way to police the internet

CBC's chat bot helps you spot 'fake news'
     
This piece arrived in my mailbox this morning, and started my day with a long, loud laugh. There is some irony in having the dean of political bias, innuendo and opinion masquerading as news creating a program (bot) to ferret out ‘fake news’.
     

You cannot replace journalistic integrity with a computer program. Balanced and fair reporting of events is difficult. Fact-checking is time consuming and has been largely ignored in our 7/24 news cycle where getting the story out first is more important than getting the story right.
     
“Breaking news” is always suspect, no matter what the source. It is first impressions news, unchecked and unverified. Within hours, breaking news stories are updated to correct obvious errors. If you are reading news on-line, check the story date and you will often see an initial date followed by an updated date. In some cases, new information comes to light and the original story is replaced with a new headline. The story is basically the same but now includes the new information.
     

If you only read and possibly passed on the original breaking news story, within days, you can find that your information is incomplete and has inaccuracies.
     
E-mail has developed into an electronic version of a back-fence community gossip vehicle. I get a lot of e-mail due to my writing. Mail recipients send me items of interest for possible publication. In the flurry are messages I have checked and found to be dishonest. I will get two or three of these in a short period and then a month or two later get another batch of the same e-mail content.
     
People receive an e-mail, usually forwarded to them by a friend, find the content interesting and pass it on to their friends which occasionally include me. One of my rules that I do my best to keep is to seek verification before publishing.

I want a second source to verify content. I often turn to “Snopes”, which has a catalogue of e-mails being circulated and an indication of whether they are real or fakes. If there is nothing on Snopes, I use search engines to seek news on key phrases in the e-mail. If that proves unsuccessful, I can safely ignore the content as bogus.
     
Our best defence against fraudulent news is a suspicious mind and common sense. Is the content of this story plausible?

One of my favourite fake news e-mails is about our government deciding to issue Canada Pension cheques as “benefits” which got many people hot and bothered as they have paid into the Canada Pension Plan for decades and payments are not government “benefits”. It turns out that the e-mail originated in the United States.

Some clown decided to adapt it to Canada and sent it out to his or her friends, who sent it out to their friends without anyone checking to see if the information was valid. In Canada, Old Age Security and the Guaranteed Income Supplement are paid out of the general revenues of the federal government and are true government benefits, but Canada Pension, which requires premium payments from employees and employers by law, is not.
     
We are inundated with news – far more news content than we can be reasonably expected to deal with. We should be protected by journalistic integrity, but it has left the building ... and there is no way to police the internet. Anyone can create a web page or e-mail materials that are plain trash.

I recall reading a story on global warming by a university professor, who was now retired and living in Canada, that looked suspicious. I tracked him down and found that he is still with a mid-western US university, and had no idea that he had allegedly published a paper on global warming.
     
Skeptic that I am, I will not employ the “chat bot”. I prefer to trust my instincts and common sense.


The Way I See It ~~ John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more