Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

OLSEN -- It seems a bit trite to say this but, I think as the various parties get wound up in their discussions, it’s entirely possible to lose this point


** Note ... while today’s commentary from MLA Adam Olsen focuses primarily on the needs and concerns of his constituents, the issues he discusses are certainly being felt across the province


As we head into the Fall, I’ve been hearing from constituents, once again, about the healthcare challenges on the Saanich Peninsula. The challenges with the current system didn’t magically disappear over the summer and in fact there have been some tragic cases presented to me that are a result of the ongoing struggle people are having with primary care delivery.

Accessing services is very difficult!

While the province negotiates agreements for a new model of service delivery focusing on team-based care, they are trying to balance a number of interests. In many cases they are competing interests. To be fair, they need to ensure that they find a way to balance the impact of change. As we know, change is difficult and when it impacts multiple interest groups, as it is in this case, it can easily become stuck.


As a Member of the Legislative Assembly I represent people from all the interest groups, and I’ve patiently worked my way through the system to try to understand their position now -- and how they got here. These are really complex and well-established relationships and systems that need to change. There are a lot of people invested in the current model of healthcare delivery, so it’s important to be patient and compassionate.

With the increasing volume of stories from my constituents who are being negatively impacted, by the shortage of primary care, it’s important to re-centre this negotiation.

Patient centred primary care ... at the centre of healthcare is the patient.

The entire business of delivering health services is not necessary without them. It seems a bit trite to say this, but I think as the various parties get wound up in their discussions it’s entirely possible to lose this point. The Minister of Health (Adrian Dix) has his priority, healthcare providers have their priority, the patient has their priority and so on.

Let’s not forget the focus of this process is to improve the outcomes of the delivery of primary care services. So, I will repeat this: the system should put the patient at the centre.

The relationship between patient and healthcare provider is one of the most intimate relationships in our society. Nobody knows more about your body. When there is a lack of choice, or visits are harried and restricted to 10-15 minutes, people do not feel well served.

This is the system we have created. It has evolved over time and those with vested interests have reinforced their position. The system of remuneration has produced the outcomes that we now all agree needs to be improved.

I will continue to work through these challenges with all the parties involved. And, I will remain laser-focussed on keeping the perspective that it is the patient we are serving as we work through the difficult challenges of balancing all the other interests.


Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more