Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Merging the Privy Council and Cabinet, as well as the Attorney General and Minister of Justice may be expedient for governments -- but is unethical


Top Level Abuse of Authority

Faced with questions about obstructing the RCMP from investigating his own office, Justin Trudeau stood smiling before the cameras and tried to hide behind the facade of the civil service  -- Brian Lilley, Toronto Sun


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is applying Privy Council confidentiality to Cabinet ministers and officials, thereby abusing his authority.        

To understand how authority is abused in the Prime Minister’s Office, we must go back in history. Traditionally, the Privy Council (properly the Queen’s Privy Council) is an office of the Governor General, not an office of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).

There are very good reasons for this.

In 1940, the Prime Minister was William Lyon Mackenzie King. He faced unusual circumstances in that Canada was at war. In January, the Clerk of the Privy Council retired after serving in various government positions for over 40 years. In February, the Governor General suffered a heart attack and died weeks thereafter.

King resented the power of the Governor General. In 1926 King had presided over a minority government and asked Governor General Lord Julian Byng to dissolve parliament and call a general election. Byng refused and asked Conservative leader Arthur Meighen, who had the largest number of seats, to form a new government. King was outraged.

King saw an opportunity and combined the positions of Clerk of the Privy Council and Clerk of the Cabinet into one position reporting to the Prime Minister. He did this through an Order in Council which ordinarily requires the signature of the Head of State to take effect, but the Governor General was deceased, so validity of the Order is in question.

The positions of the Clerk of the Privy Council and the Clerk of the Cabinet must be separated, and the Clerk of the Privy Council returned to reporting to the Governor General for parliament to function properly

There are different levels of confidentiality between the Privy Council and Cabinet.

Confidentiality of the Privy Council is absolute. Confidentiality of Cabinet is less so and can be challenged in the courts. The desirability of having the Privy Council report to the Governor General is that it is then politically neutral.

In times of crisis or catastrophe, the Governor General can convene a meeting of the Privy Council which includes former party leaders and ministers to provide advice on action. The GG can arrange to have current opposition party leaders briefed on the circumstances the government faces.

That is why neutrality of the Privy Council is critical. The iron-clad confidentiality of the Privy Council prevents opposition members from revealing what was disclosed in a privy council briefing.

The positions of the Clerk of the Privy Council and the Clerk of the Cabinet must be separated, and the Clerk of the Privy Council returned to reporting to the Governor General for parliament to function properly.

The same rule applies to the offices of the Attorney General and Minister of Justice.

The position of the Attorney General must be politically neutral; administration of justice cannot be otherwise. The Minister of Justice is a member of the government and acts accordingly. One person cannot hold both positions without a conflict of interests.

Merging the Privy Council and Cabinet, as well as the Attorney General and Minister of Justice may be expedient for governments -- but is unethical. This is not just a Trudeau problem; it has existed for nearly 80 years. It is only during scandal that these issues arise and require examination of how we can avoid recurrence.

The SNC-Lavalin affair is a perfect example of where the ethics (or lack thereof) of the attorney general and privy council are brought into sharp focus.


The Way I See It ~~ John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

John Feldsted ... grew up in a conservative family with a deep interest in arts, history, law, and where reading was a requisite to education. He is steadfastly conservative John strongly believes that the best defense for democracy is an informed electorate.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more