Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Merging the Privy Council and Cabinet, as well as the Attorney General and Minister of Justice may be expedient for governments -- but is unethical


Top Level Abuse of Authority

Faced with questions about obstructing the RCMP from investigating his own office, Justin Trudeau stood smiling before the cameras and tried to hide behind the facade of the civil service  -- Brian Lilley, Toronto Sun


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is applying Privy Council confidentiality to Cabinet ministers and officials, thereby abusing his authority.        

To understand how authority is abused in the Prime Minister’s Office, we must go back in history. Traditionally, the Privy Council (properly the Queen’s Privy Council) is an office of the Governor General, not an office of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).

There are very good reasons for this.

In 1940, the Prime Minister was William Lyon Mackenzie King. He faced unusual circumstances in that Canada was at war. In January, the Clerk of the Privy Council retired after serving in various government positions for over 40 years. In February, the Governor General suffered a heart attack and died weeks thereafter.

King resented the power of the Governor General. In 1926 King had presided over a minority government and asked Governor General Lord Julian Byng to dissolve parliament and call a general election. Byng refused and asked Conservative leader Arthur Meighen, who had the largest number of seats, to form a new government. King was outraged.

King saw an opportunity and combined the positions of Clerk of the Privy Council and Clerk of the Cabinet into one position reporting to the Prime Minister. He did this through an Order in Council which ordinarily requires the signature of the Head of State to take effect, but the Governor General was deceased, so validity of the Order is in question.

The positions of the Clerk of the Privy Council and the Clerk of the Cabinet must be separated, and the Clerk of the Privy Council returned to reporting to the Governor General for parliament to function properly

There are different levels of confidentiality between the Privy Council and Cabinet.

Confidentiality of the Privy Council is absolute. Confidentiality of Cabinet is less so and can be challenged in the courts. The desirability of having the Privy Council report to the Governor General is that it is then politically neutral.

In times of crisis or catastrophe, the Governor General can convene a meeting of the Privy Council which includes former party leaders and ministers to provide advice on action. The GG can arrange to have current opposition party leaders briefed on the circumstances the government faces.

That is why neutrality of the Privy Council is critical. The iron-clad confidentiality of the Privy Council prevents opposition members from revealing what was disclosed in a privy council briefing.

The positions of the Clerk of the Privy Council and the Clerk of the Cabinet must be separated, and the Clerk of the Privy Council returned to reporting to the Governor General for parliament to function properly.

The same rule applies to the offices of the Attorney General and Minister of Justice.

The position of the Attorney General must be politically neutral; administration of justice cannot be otherwise. The Minister of Justice is a member of the government and acts accordingly. One person cannot hold both positions without a conflict of interests.

Merging the Privy Council and Cabinet, as well as the Attorney General and Minister of Justice may be expedient for governments -- but is unethical. This is not just a Trudeau problem; it has existed for nearly 80 years. It is only during scandal that these issues arise and require examination of how we can avoid recurrence.

The SNC-Lavalin affair is a perfect example of where the ethics (or lack thereof) of the attorney general and privy council are brought into sharp focus.


The Way I See It ~~ John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

John Feldsted ... grew up in a conservative family with a deep interest in arts, history, law, and where reading was a requisite to education. He is steadfastly conservative John strongly believes that the best defense for democracy is an informed electorate.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more