Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Merging the Privy Council and Cabinet, as well as the Attorney General and Minister of Justice may be expedient for governments -- but is unethical


Top Level Abuse of Authority

Faced with questions about obstructing the RCMP from investigating his own office, Justin Trudeau stood smiling before the cameras and tried to hide behind the facade of the civil service  -- Brian Lilley, Toronto Sun


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is applying Privy Council confidentiality to Cabinet ministers and officials, thereby abusing his authority.        

To understand how authority is abused in the Prime Minister’s Office, we must go back in history. Traditionally, the Privy Council (properly the Queen’s Privy Council) is an office of the Governor General, not an office of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).

There are very good reasons for this.

In 1940, the Prime Minister was William Lyon Mackenzie King. He faced unusual circumstances in that Canada was at war. In January, the Clerk of the Privy Council retired after serving in various government positions for over 40 years. In February, the Governor General suffered a heart attack and died weeks thereafter.

King resented the power of the Governor General. In 1926 King had presided over a minority government and asked Governor General Lord Julian Byng to dissolve parliament and call a general election. Byng refused and asked Conservative leader Arthur Meighen, who had the largest number of seats, to form a new government. King was outraged.

King saw an opportunity and combined the positions of Clerk of the Privy Council and Clerk of the Cabinet into one position reporting to the Prime Minister. He did this through an Order in Council which ordinarily requires the signature of the Head of State to take effect, but the Governor General was deceased, so validity of the Order is in question.

The positions of the Clerk of the Privy Council and the Clerk of the Cabinet must be separated, and the Clerk of the Privy Council returned to reporting to the Governor General for parliament to function properly

There are different levels of confidentiality between the Privy Council and Cabinet.

Confidentiality of the Privy Council is absolute. Confidentiality of Cabinet is less so and can be challenged in the courts. The desirability of having the Privy Council report to the Governor General is that it is then politically neutral.

In times of crisis or catastrophe, the Governor General can convene a meeting of the Privy Council which includes former party leaders and ministers to provide advice on action. The GG can arrange to have current opposition party leaders briefed on the circumstances the government faces.

That is why neutrality of the Privy Council is critical. The iron-clad confidentiality of the Privy Council prevents opposition members from revealing what was disclosed in a privy council briefing.

The positions of the Clerk of the Privy Council and the Clerk of the Cabinet must be separated, and the Clerk of the Privy Council returned to reporting to the Governor General for parliament to function properly.

The same rule applies to the offices of the Attorney General and Minister of Justice.

The position of the Attorney General must be politically neutral; administration of justice cannot be otherwise. The Minister of Justice is a member of the government and acts accordingly. One person cannot hold both positions without a conflict of interests.

Merging the Privy Council and Cabinet, as well as the Attorney General and Minister of Justice may be expedient for governments -- but is unethical. This is not just a Trudeau problem; it has existed for nearly 80 years. It is only during scandal that these issues arise and require examination of how we can avoid recurrence.

The SNC-Lavalin affair is a perfect example of where the ethics (or lack thereof) of the attorney general and privy council are brought into sharp focus.


The Way I See It ~~ John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

John Feldsted ... grew up in a conservative family with a deep interest in arts, history, law, and where reading was a requisite to education. He is steadfastly conservative John strongly believes that the best defense for democracy is an informed electorate.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more