Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WILSON: How one leader can be subject to weeks of judgemental commentary about a foolish choice to blacken his face, while another removes his turban to pander to actual bigotry


I know I am not alone in my love for this country, which is why I am compelled to write a short series of blogs about our federal election and what it means to Canada.

Our politicians are campaigning for seats, appealing to special interest groups who operate on a members-only policy, be they Quebecois, the "black" community, LGBTQ, recent immigrants, middle-class Canadians or Indigenous people.

But who is campaigning for Canada?

Who is fighting for the fundamental principles enshrined in our Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms? These represent the foundation upon which this great nation was built.

Bill 21 is a racist piece of legislation ... after all, it’s a whole lot easier to hide a crucifix under a blouse or shirt than it is to hide a hijab, burqa or kippah for orthodox Jews and yes, a turban

It will not matter who wins the most seats if we sit quietly by and allow our country's foundation to be eroded through pandering to those who demand their interests be put before those of our nation. Our country will fall: ungovernable, shattered like a priceless vase, the shards too broken to piece together again.

Let me provide a case in point.


A turban-less NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh tells Quebecers he has taken off his turban to show an openness to their distinctive character, one that permits the Quebec provincial government to pass into law Bill 21, which removes the right of individuals to wear “religious symbols” if working for the government or in a public sector job.

In other words, if Jagmeet Singh was a police officer or a teacher in the province of Quebec, he would not be permitted to go to work wearing his turban.

The NDP’s Deputy Leader Alexandre Boulerice said, when questioned on the subject, “… it’s not the end of the world and he can show his head without a turban and it’s not a big deal.”

Seriously?

Bill 21 is a racist piece of legislation designed primarily to cause devout Muslim women to remove the hijab and burqa when at work. After all, it’s a whole lot easier to hide a crucifix under a blouse or shirt than it is to hide a hijab, burqa or kippah for orthodox Jews and yes, a turban.

Bill 21 tramples over an individual’s religious freedom in the workplace and should, if subjected to a challenge under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, almost certainly fail.

But wait - Quebec in not a signatory to the Constitution and does not abide by the Charter that governs the rest of Canada, so affectionately referred to as ROC.

The bill fulfilled a campaign promise by Quebec Premier François Legault, who along with ministers said that it will affirm the “Quebecois nation’s” (a.k.a. white francophones who were among the first immigrants to Quebec) way of life alongside laws such as Bill 101, the Charter of the French Language.

Singh, who was vocal in his opposition to Bill 21 when first passed in the provincial legislature, is desperate to hold onto NDP seats in Quebec. This makes it particularly disconcerting to watch him champion rights and freedoms for Canadians in the rest of Canada, then tell Quebecers he is sensitive to their “distinct” society and would 'have their backs'.

I fail to understand how one leader can be the subject of weeks of judgemental commentary about a foolish choice to blacken his face at a costume party, while another federal leader removes his turban to pander to actual bigotry and there's barely a whisper from the religious minorities he just sold out.

Scheer has told Quebecers a federal Conservative government will not interfere in Quebec’s affairs, while Trudeau, who strongly opposed the bill, said he doesn’t feel a government, any government, should legislate what people wear, but has stopped short of saying what a federal government might try to do about it.

Soon I will post about the erosion of constitutional authorities, and following that, will
Gordon Wilson
share my thoughts about UNDRIP, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People.


Gordon Wilson is a writer and business consultant who served as an elected MLA from 1991 -2001.  During that time, he held several cabinet posts including Minister of Forests, Aboriginal Affairs and Minister of Finance. He has consulted widely matters pertaining to the Canadian resource economy, and the Canadian Constitution. He currently lives on a small sheep farm in Powell River.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more