Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WILSON: How one leader can be subject to weeks of judgemental commentary about a foolish choice to blacken his face, while another removes his turban to pander to actual bigotry


I know I am not alone in my love for this country, which is why I am compelled to write a short series of blogs about our federal election and what it means to Canada.

Our politicians are campaigning for seats, appealing to special interest groups who operate on a members-only policy, be they Quebecois, the "black" community, LGBTQ, recent immigrants, middle-class Canadians or Indigenous people.

But who is campaigning for Canada?

Who is fighting for the fundamental principles enshrined in our Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms? These represent the foundation upon which this great nation was built.

Bill 21 is a racist piece of legislation ... after all, it’s a whole lot easier to hide a crucifix under a blouse or shirt than it is to hide a hijab, burqa or kippah for orthodox Jews and yes, a turban

It will not matter who wins the most seats if we sit quietly by and allow our country's foundation to be eroded through pandering to those who demand their interests be put before those of our nation. Our country will fall: ungovernable, shattered like a priceless vase, the shards too broken to piece together again.

Let me provide a case in point.


A turban-less NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh tells Quebecers he has taken off his turban to show an openness to their distinctive character, one that permits the Quebec provincial government to pass into law Bill 21, which removes the right of individuals to wear “religious symbols” if working for the government or in a public sector job.

In other words, if Jagmeet Singh was a police officer or a teacher in the province of Quebec, he would not be permitted to go to work wearing his turban.

The NDP’s Deputy Leader Alexandre Boulerice said, when questioned on the subject, “… it’s not the end of the world and he can show his head without a turban and it’s not a big deal.”

Seriously?

Bill 21 is a racist piece of legislation designed primarily to cause devout Muslim women to remove the hijab and burqa when at work. After all, it’s a whole lot easier to hide a crucifix under a blouse or shirt than it is to hide a hijab, burqa or kippah for orthodox Jews and yes, a turban.

Bill 21 tramples over an individual’s religious freedom in the workplace and should, if subjected to a challenge under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, almost certainly fail.

But wait - Quebec in not a signatory to the Constitution and does not abide by the Charter that governs the rest of Canada, so affectionately referred to as ROC.

The bill fulfilled a campaign promise by Quebec Premier François Legault, who along with ministers said that it will affirm the “Quebecois nation’s” (a.k.a. white francophones who were among the first immigrants to Quebec) way of life alongside laws such as Bill 101, the Charter of the French Language.

Singh, who was vocal in his opposition to Bill 21 when first passed in the provincial legislature, is desperate to hold onto NDP seats in Quebec. This makes it particularly disconcerting to watch him champion rights and freedoms for Canadians in the rest of Canada, then tell Quebecers he is sensitive to their “distinct” society and would 'have their backs'.

I fail to understand how one leader can be the subject of weeks of judgemental commentary about a foolish choice to blacken his face at a costume party, while another federal leader removes his turban to pander to actual bigotry and there's barely a whisper from the religious minorities he just sold out.

Scheer has told Quebecers a federal Conservative government will not interfere in Quebec’s affairs, while Trudeau, who strongly opposed the bill, said he doesn’t feel a government, any government, should legislate what people wear, but has stopped short of saying what a federal government might try to do about it.

Soon I will post about the erosion of constitutional authorities, and following that, will
Gordon Wilson
share my thoughts about UNDRIP, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People.


Gordon Wilson is a writer and business consultant who served as an elected MLA from 1991 -2001.  During that time, he held several cabinet posts including Minister of Forests, Aboriginal Affairs and Minister of Finance. He has consulted widely matters pertaining to the Canadian resource economy, and the Canadian Constitution. He currently lives on a small sheep farm in Powell River.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more