Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

PETERSON – Having Maxime Bernier in these televised debates is good for the election campaign, good for all Canadians, and good for the Conservative Party


Is Maxime Bernier the Big Bad Wolf of Canadian politics?

You’d think so, to hear Jagmeet Singh, Elizabeth May and others who don’t want Bernier on stage for the Oct. 7 and 10 national party leaders’ debates.

But not us. We can’t wait to see Bernier on stage. Bring it on.



PPC leader Maxime Bernier (Facebook image)
And we say this as a staunch pro-Conservative group, registered as a third-party advertiser with Elections Canada, doing everything we can to help Andrew Scheer become the next prime minister.

Last week, the government-appointed Leaders’ Debates Commission — a terrible idea in the first place — walked back its original decision to keep Bernier out of the debates and announced they were letting him in.

Set aside the fact that it’s almost too rich to think that a strong opponent of supply management would be shut out of these debates by a government-appointed board that controls access to the “vote market.”

Having Maxime Bernier in these televised debates is good for the election campaign, good for all Canadians, and good for the Conservative Party.


On principle, if Elections Canada has recognized the People’s Party of Canada as a national party, and if Bernier has nominated candidates that have been accepted by Elections Canada in 300 or so ridings, why should he not be on stage?

If anything, he’s more of a legitimate national party leader than Yves-Francois Blanchet, who leads a “federal” Bloc Quebecois separatist party with no pretension of forming a government and fielding no candidates outside of Quebec.

But it’s the politics and personality of Bernier that are the most intriguing reason why we’re glad to see him on stage.

Nearly half of the Conservative party members supported Bernier in his leadership bid, which was focused largely on issues of the economy, free markets and the fight against supply management. Here in Alberta, this “cowboy from Quebec” was clearly at home on the range.

But the Maxime Bernier we all saw and knew in May 2017 doesn’t seem to be the same person we see today. His charm, optimism and enthusiasm are still there in spades. But his policies have veered to the right, his populism has taken on a new and more strident tone. Even his social media postings have gone from being quirky and edgy to now being over the top rants and clumsy attacks.

That’s not the same Max we knew before.” We hear that all the time.

His messaging on the environment and immigration today sets him apart from most Conservatives, and even bring him closer to policies that he ridiculed on the leadership campaign trail. He attacked Kellie Leitch’s views on Canadian values, saying, “We don’t need this karaoke version of Donald Trump,” but today appears to be comfortable with the Trump views on immigration.

Or is he? Who knows?

He’s never been seen in a debate. He’s never had his positions tested under fire, live and in a structured format. He’s been in front of mainly friendly audiences and grassroots supporters who deeply believe in him.

Every single Conservative and every Canadian should get the chance to see him defend his policies under fire from other leaders. We’ll see how he stacks up, and we’ll see how he performs when it counts the most. And then we’ll see how many Canadians will follow him on October 21.

It’s our bet that any Conservatives who may still be looking, with some interest at the PPC, will take a step back after the national debates.

It’s one thing to start a party from scratch and build up a bona fide campaign apparatus. Bernier has done that, and he clearly deserves kudos for doing so.

But it’s quite another thing to become our next prime minister. Does he have what it takes? A national debate goes a long way toward helping most people make up their minds on that question.

Bring it on, Mr. Wolf. Show us what you’ve got. 


Rick Peterson is the founder and a director of Suits and Boots Corp., a national not-for-profit group which supports Canada’s resource sector workers and their families.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more