Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Depending on the venue, we see the feminist, champion of the downtrodden, ardent environmentalist, champion of the middle class, protector of private sector jobs; the list goes on


Revelations that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has dressed in costume and dark makeup on several occasions have turned into a storm of controversy over implied racism -- as if that is the sole factor of the PM’s behaviour under consideration.

It is only one aspect of much deeper problems.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
Trudeau has apologized profusely and repeatedly. He has stated that he was unaware of the harm his actions involved, and that his privileged upbringing has left him with blind spots, that allowed him to act thoughtlessly without consideration of the consequences and he is ashamed.

Trudeau lacks a moral compass and thus fails to differentiate between right and wrong. He does not recognize personal responsibility which makes his claims of being ashamed and embarrassed by his racism ring hollow.

While he claims to accept responsibility for his various missteps, he does not follow through with action to ensure missteps will not be repeated.

His 2015 election campaign quip that “the budget will balance itself” turns out to be strikingly prophetic. Without a moral compass, and a sense of personal responsibility, he honestly believes that the mundane matters of sound public administration are self-regulating.


How else can he explain his failure to recognize accepting a vacation on the Aga Khan’s private island, while his government was engaged in dealing with the Khan’s charities, was unethical. His initial explanation was that the Aga Khan was a family friend and so consorting with him was normal and usual.

He could not comprehend the conflict of interest.

For the same reason, Trudeau could not understand that helping SNC-Lavalin to escape prosecution for violating bribery laws called his character into question. He could not appreciate that pressuring the Attorney General to give SNC-Lavalin a break was both unethical and unlawful. He was blind to the severe fallout from his actions. 

It helps to understand that Justin Trudeau is an actor. He relishes role play and is adept at it. That leads to his love of costumes and make-up. He shifts his character to suite the environment he is in.

Contrast his behaviour when he attends a pride parade to that he adopts when visiting a major industrial plant, or when he is dealing with a town hall type of event.

Three different venues, three different characters. Depending on the venue, we see Trudeau the feminist, champion of the downtrodden, ardent environmentalist, champion of the middle class, protector of private sector jobs, and the list goes on.

What we don’t see is a coherent link between the roles, a sense of fairness and equality, a strong sense of right and wrong or an awareness that economic and social issues are closely intertwined and interdependent.

His failure to pay close attention to the basics is unacceptable. Everyone must ensure that the basics; food, shelter, clothing, health and education are funded, protected and sustainable over the long term. We put our needs first and consider filling our wants as we can afford them.

Governments must ensure that the basic services they provide are funded for the long term and protected against the unforeseen. It is dreary, mundane, expected and unworthy of accolades but vital to good governance.

Justin Trudeau has consistently ignored his government’s fundamental responsibilities in favour of new concepts, programs and initiatives. His focus on appointing a gender balanced cabinet rather than appointing the most competent people available “because it is 2015” is not responsible leadership.

Without the ethical and personal responsibility standards and values adopted by our society, he is not capable of empathy with the people his government serves. Those standards and values are key to the development of a compassionate, fair and free society.

We cannot trash the tried and true and reinvent a society with different standards and values. We learn from mistakes and evolve over time. It is not a process that can be forced except in a totalitarian regime.      

Trudeau has never had to concern himself with having to curtail spending to ensure the basics are met. He has always enjoyed sufficient income and resources to live worry free which leaves him blind to the fundamentals of sound public administration.

That does not make Trudeau a bad person, but it makes him woefully ill-suited and inadequate to manage the duties of a Prime Minister and leader of our nation.

The Way I See It ~~ John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more