Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

CANADA’S ENERGY CITIZENS -- Activist publications have the right to advocate for their cause, but not with inaccurate or misleading information

Misinformation should always be pushed back against, and last week we came across another example of an organization making some pretty bold claims about the oil and gas sector.

This time it was a new report from another activist organization trying to push the mythical narrative that the production of oil and natural gas in Canada is heavily subsidized.

They are simply wrong.

Take for example a report this week by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) – one of the leading publishers of ‘fossil fuel subsidy reports’.

Their report alleges Canada subsidized fossil-fuel producers with $16 billion in aid in response to the pandemic, while providing very little to other priorities.

That $16 billion figured seemed a lot higher than anything we have seen reported, so we decided to take a look at their numbers.

Interestingly, the IISD’s report includes a number of initiatives any reasonable person would find a stretch to consider a ‘fossil fuel subsidy’. Here’s a list:

  • Highway and bridge replacements as part of Ontario’s Action Plan: Responding to COVID-19’ - $1.9 billion,
  • Highway and bridge investments, Alberta $234.43 million,
  • Stimulus to advance highway projects’ in Manitoba,
  • Funding for lost revenues in the aviation industry in the Yukon, $9.96 million,
  • Reduction in vehicle registration fees in Manitoba $8.06 million,
  • Purchase of natural gas power plants in Ontario for electricity generation - $2.05 billion,
  • Waiving of rent for ground leases for 21 airport authorities - $242.78 million.

To us, it seems a little odd to include infrastructure investments designed to put people back to work under the umbrella of ‘fossil fuel subsidies’ - it is even weirder to include state-owned insurance providers reducing vehicle registration fees when no one is driving. And last we checked, a Tesla still requires a road.

NONE of those are subsidies for the oil and gas industry or could even be considered direct support for oil and oil natural gas production.

In fact, the entire narrative activist groups have created on oil and natural gas production being heavily subsidized does not exist – which has been recently confirmed by our own federal government.

According to a briefing note from Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN):

Given the nature of NRCAN’s direct spending (i.e. innovation and environmental performance), the department does not provide any inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful production or consumption of fossil fuels"

And, in recently speaking with the National Observer, Federal Minister of Infrastructure and Communities, Catherine McKenna statedwe eliminated all of the fossil fuel subsidies at the federal level”.

These activist publications have the right to advocate for their cause, but not with inaccurate or misleading information on an industry so integral to Canada’s economic recovery and continued prosperity.

We would appreciate it if shared our story with your friends and family: https://www.energycitizens.ca/digging_for_subsidies


Canada's Energy Citizens
http://www.energycitizens.ca/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more