Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED – (In government, agencies, and organizations) The top of the chain of command promotes those he knows to be subservient to avoid a threat to his or her power

There is a difference between schooling and education.



For decades, we have put a heavy emphasis on the value of schooling. The thinking is that the four or more years of university study involves discipline that will produce a superior intellect.

Another factor is the social aspect. Exposure to prevalent attitudes, standards and values will fit a person to either private or public employment. While that seems viable, it is a ‘groupthink’ trap.

That is where systemic discrimination has its roots.

Education commences when the schooling is applied in the real world where decisions have consequences. When people make bad decisions, which is inevitable, they either analyze the reasons for the bad decision and learn, or try to minimize the consequences and remain ignorant.

The ‘old boy’ system encourages the latter for several reasons.

When someone on a lower-strata makes a bad decision, and those above protect him or her from the consequences, they establish a new relationship. The person ‘saved’ is no longer just an employee, but someone subservient. The strings are subtle, but real.

That brings up another factor, particularly evident in large organizations. When there is a competition for promotion, the level above will choose to promote a subservient to promoting someone capable. Competent people are a threat to incumbents, while subservient people are not.

Over time, the rot works its way to the top. The top of the chain of command promotes those he knows to be subservient to avoid a threat to his or her power. The chain of command, down to middle management, is thus riddled with people who are subservient rather than competent.

That is why the RCMP is in a mess, and the same factors apply in every government department and agency.

It is not who you know that governs promotions, but what the layers above have on you. There is a degree of replication in private enterprise, but it is curbed by the profit motive. When subservience gets in the way of profit, a private organization will clean house. There is no similar check in the public sector.

When we examine our government, the lack of competence is obvious. Huge departments overseeing multi-millions in spending have chronic problems. Two examples stand out – Indian Affairs and Veterans Affairs. Both have been abject failures for decades. The failings are well known and documented. There are no changes to operations. Lessons are not learned. Ignorance persists.

Even with a change of government and new department ministers, incumbent civil servants are masters at passive resistance.

Although a new minister may strive to bring about improvements, the civil service simply slows implementing orders. At some point the directive sits in someone’s ‘in’ basket awaiting a follow-up. If there is no follow-up the directive is ‘lost’.

Since there are no penalties for incompetence or errors, there is no incentive for civil servants to improve. They come to understand the subservient structure and the futility of giving their job the best they can. Superior performance will not result in promotions or rewards.

As if this picture is not bleak enough, the head of the civil service is the Privy Council Clerk ... who is part of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO). On top of the subservient structure, we have political interference as party stalwarts and supporters are rewarded with civil service positions, politicizing the civil service.

When the Prime Mister tries to assure us that the WE charity decision was based on the recommendation of a neutral civil service, I break out in laughter.

You will recall the SNC-Lavalin affair where the Privy Council Clerk, on behalf of the Prime Minister was pressuring the Attorney General to forego prosecuting SNC-Lavalin. We have every reason to believe that the Prime Minster wanted to give the WE charity a boost and asked the Privy Council Clerk to make it happen. That is the way the PMO works.

The PMO and government do not learn. They are incapable of analyzing their errors to establish where they went wrong and make corrections. That is why our Prime Minister is facing yet another conflict of interest investigation.

He failed to learn from the first two instances where he was found in conflict and remains ignorant. He may be schooled but he lacks education.


John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...
Post a Comment
Read more

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eby government signs another land-use agreement, as they say one thing and do another, during DRIPA chaos

While promising to fix DRIPA, the Eby government continues to quietly sign binding land-use agreements that fundamentally alter how Crown land is governed in British Columbia. On January 15, 2026, the government signed four ministerial orders advancing the Gwa’ni Land Use Planning Project with the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, amending the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan and changing how more than 166,000 hectares of Crown land can be accessed, developed, and managed. “This is Land Act reform by stealth,” said Critic for Indigenous Relations Scott McInnis. “British Columbians already rejected these changes once. In 2024, public backlash forced the NDP to pull its Land Act amendments. Instead of listening, this government has gone underground, signing individual deals behind closed doors, just like we’ve already seen in places such as Squamish, Teẑtan Biny, and across Northwest BC.” “The Premier admits DRIPA ( the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act) is creating ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more