Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Discrimination fractures us into warring enclaves rather than engaging us collectively to improve our quality of life and standard of living

Britain is not alone confronting a new breed of morally pure zealots determined to erase evidence of history they deem uncomfortable. Their mantra is that they cannot tolerate discrimination, even if it took place decades or even centuries ago and they demand that everyone else change without excuses or procrastination.

Minorities have legitimate reasons to protest discrimination and insist on changes. Layers of secret discrimination underlie the beatings, bullying, hazing and murders that must not be tolerated. Roots of discrimination go well beyond race or colour.

Discrimination is irrational, based on a person being perceived as ‘different’ or ‘defective’ and thus a target for demeaning, disparaging and worse.

Minorities refuse to accept that they are part of the problem.

These moralists are modern versions of Seth Pecksniff, pointing the way to high moral standards without adopting and employing them. They are as useful as directional sign posts and equally intelligent. Every race has a history of slavery and discrimination. Tribes enslaved survivors of wars, captured slaves from other tribes, and owned, bought and sold slaves as chattels.

Solutions require forgiveness, patience, tolerance and respect from all of us.

Solutions will not come from shaming, tearing down statues, renaming buildings and streets, or rioting.

Venting pent-up anger is understandable. Advocating change is reasonable.

Dismantling historical markers, and advocating replacement of order with chaos, is not.

We need to look back at where we once were, how far we have come, and recognize that we have to redouble efforts to make our society inclusive and equal in terms of opportunity for every person.

We do not hear about the tens of thousands of minority members who have succeeded. They have overcome discrimination and could be wise advocates and mentors of those seeking changes from governments and the general population.

They have walked the walk and know the pitfalls and subtleties of discrimination.

They can be invaluable in mapping out a framework for policies that will encourage and foster change.

We cannot eliminate discrimination without the full participation of everyone, including the victims of discrimination. At the start, nothing will satisfy activists. Every race and tribe, and every strata within those bodies, has people undeserving of respect. Their attitudes and behaviours are not acceptable to their peers or anyone else. These “bad apples” are not representative of their group and we must not use them as stereotypes.

We must start with rectifying the most conspicuous examples of discrimination, eliminate those and keep working to eliminate other types of discrimination until we achieve a discrimination free society.

Every person has the right to conduct his or her affairs without fear of being bullied, denied services, or denied equal opportunities of acceptance, employment, earnings and promotions. Equal opportunities do not result in equal outcomes; outcomes vary in accordance with individual effort. We have to level the playing field and ensure that every person has equal opportunities to grow and thrive.

Equality of opportunity, free from discrimination, must be our goal. That will require a concerted effort by everyone.

We cannot choose any group as being responsible for discrimination, or give any group a free pass. That is like putting a patch on a hole in a boat bottom that has been machine gunned. If we want to rebuild a society in danger of civil war, we have to take a more reasoned and effective approach and solicit help from everyone.

We face a common problem. Discrimination is insidious and those least vulnerable today may be tomorrow’s victims.

Our failure to live together peacefully and respectfully is a far greater risk to our future as a nation than any virus or war.

Our society is dying from a thousand acts of discrimination each day. Discrimination fractures us into warring enclaves rather than engaging us collectively to improve our quality of life and standard of living.

People caught in acts of discrimination need education, not censure. Censure creates resentment while education creates enlightenment.

We have failed to address discrimination. It is not a topic of conversation, discussion or debate.

Until it is, we are guilty of avoiding a commitment to creating a truly inclusive and equal society of peers.


John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more