Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- There are skunks in our living room!

Watching the WE soap opera unfold is surreal. As the days pass and more details are revealed we can conclude that no one is telling the truth and everyone is hiding details.

When the brothers Kielburger said they did not have a profit motive in engaging in the student grant program, they sounded like idiots. The WE charity stood to gain fees for administration along with substantial prestige.

Fees paid to Justin Trudeau’s mother and brother are incidental -- as is Bill Morneau’s daughter’s employment with WE. Trudeau and Morneau have both strongly supported the WE organization for years. That is perfectly legitimate and legal. However, that support precludes the government from doing business with the WE organization.

Not only is it a blatant conflict of interest, but since the WE organization was to be paid fees and would enhance its prestige, it also becomes a criminal issue. Government officials can’t do business with friends who stand to gain from the transaction.

That is corruption.

The finance committee hearings are bad theatre; when the hearings end, then what? We have skunks occupying the living room. The air is increasingly odorous and it is going to get worse before it gets better. What are our elected representatives doing about it?

NOTHING.

Liberal members are condoning corruption. The NDP has announced it is condoning corruption by supporting the Liberals. The BQ is ideologically opposed to seeking help from the Governor General. The Conservatives have not filed a complaint with the police respecting criminal activities or petitioned the Governor General to remove the Prime Minister and Finance Minister for cause.

There is a reason why government programs are not administered by third parties. It is not possible for a government to contract with a third party to administer a grant program without giving the administrator a boost in prestige and a wide audience. In the competitive field of charities that has a huge value. The WE organization does not appear on the list of Canada’s top 100 charities.

The WE organization is a political movement, not a charity:

Through the service-learning campaigns and curriculum, students gain an understanding of issues like hunger, poverty, access to education, diversity and inclusion, racism and black racism, the environment and sustainability, LGBTQ2IA+, equality, human rights, Black Lives Matter, proactive mental health, and gain the skills to plan and carry out at least one local and one global action to make a difference. The program also includes educational resources and a calendar full of action campaign ideas to inspire them.

AND ... 

Over 24 years ago, they set out on a bold mission: to work with developing communities to free children and their families from the cycle of poverty and exploitation.

“students gain an understanding of issues like hunger, poverty, access to education, diversity and inclusion, racism and black racism, the environment and sustainability, LGBTQ2IA+, equality, human rights, Black Lives Matter, proactive mental health” ...


This is just a list of social media hot button issues, many very recent, not even months old. Is the WE organization aim to create student social warriors?

Why do we need the WE organization in our schools? Has any provincial Department of Education approved the WE approach? If WE is that good, and necessary, why are they not part of our school curriculum's? The WE organization does not pass a smell test.       

We must be vigilant about what organizations gain access to vulnerable children. No charity or other organization should gain access without a thorough screening of its finances, reputations and motives. Local school boards and parents should be consulted before access is allowed.

The government has spent about a half a trillion dollars on various measures to support personal and business income losses due to the epidemic lock-down. Whether these efforts are successful or nor remains to be seen. It is unfortunate that blundering into a contract with the WE organization has seriously damaged the goodwill arising from those efforts.

The Prime Minister’s involvement with and promotion of the WE organization has been known for years as has Morneau’s involvement. Suggestions that the civil service was not influenced by the actions of the PM and Finance Minister are incredibly naive.     

Our Prime Minister and Finance Minister are caught in multiple breaches of the conflict of interest law and both have been found guilty on previous occasions.

A breach of trust is a serious matter. They hold the top two positions in government.

They cannot be allowed to keep their positions without damaging public trust in democracy and in parliament itself. They are sole authors of their dilemma and have no one else to blame. 


John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

Rob Shaw: Eby should be worried why mudslinging missed the mark in B.C. election

  Why did a BC NDP election campaign overwhelmingly focused on attacking the character of the BC Conservatives fail to prevent a blue wave that came within 27 votes of toppling the governing party? Partly because voters didn’t much care for, or about, all the New Democrat mudslinging. They were just hopping mad about some very specific issues ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more