Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN RUSTAD -- These are all tough choices and require a comprehensive plan, political will and vision. None of these are evident with the current NDP government

Okay, now that we appear to have COVID-19 under control, how will governments pay for their actions?

 

There is still a risk of a second wave, and more issues to come, but the bill for all of the government support is a sure thing.

 

British Columbia’s deficit?

 

We will hear a start of the telling of that tale later this month from the finance minister. My guess is that BC will be looking at a deficit somewhere between $7 and $15 billion.

 

To put that in perspective, that is possibly more than the combined total amount of income taxes and sales taxes collected in BC. There are three options (for paying that back):

 

First ... grow the economy at a faster rate than spending to shrink the deficit over a number of years. This is the best option but with all of the negative NDP policies, unfortunately it is not likely.

 

Second ... increase taxes. This would be very negative for quality of life and economic activity but it appears to be the preferred option of the NDP. So far, in 3 years, they have added about 23 new or increased taxes. But given the size of the deficit and the projected increases in spending over the next number of years, the NDP won't be able to erase the deficit with basic taxation. I will speculate on a number of new taxes I suspect they will look at below.

 

Third ... reduce spending. This is not the preferred option as it would impact programs and services, not to mention many families. However, some spending reductions or spending freezes may be required to get on a track to eliminate the deficit.

 

These are all tough choices and require a comprehensive plan, political will and vision. None of these are evident with the current NDP government.

 

My guess is that under a continued NDP government, the NDP will go after capital assets.

 

In other words, they will expand their so called "school tax" which is more properly called an asset tax.

 

They may consider limiting the capital gains you are allowed to make on your home. This is currently tax exempt.

 

They will likely consider another asset tax on high net worth individuals. That doesn't sound bad until you consider that once it is implemented, the "level" at which that asset tax will be applied will come down over time.

 

And the grand daddy of them all?

 

I strongly suspect the NDP will consider an inheritance tax. The baby boomers have accumulated more wealth than any generation in the world’s history. It will be the largest transfer of wealth from one generation to the next.

 

That large, fat target is no doubt in the NDP cross hairs for a future tax.

 

But don't worry. The NDP spin doctors will call any of these new taxes a name which will hide the real intent ... just like they have with so many other things.

 

 

JOHN RUSTAD ... was first elected as the BC Liberal MLA for Nechako Lakes (2005); he previously served as the Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation -- Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations -- and as Parliamentary Secretary for Forestry.

 

He currently serves as the Official Opposition's critic on Forest, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations and was appointed to the Select Standing Committee on Parliamentary Reform, Ethical Conduct, Standing Orders, and Private Bills.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more