Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN RUSTAD -- These are all tough choices and require a comprehensive plan, political will and vision. None of these are evident with the current NDP government

Okay, now that we appear to have COVID-19 under control, how will governments pay for their actions?

 

There is still a risk of a second wave, and more issues to come, but the bill for all of the government support is a sure thing.

 

British Columbia’s deficit?

 

We will hear a start of the telling of that tale later this month from the finance minister. My guess is that BC will be looking at a deficit somewhere between $7 and $15 billion.

 

To put that in perspective, that is possibly more than the combined total amount of income taxes and sales taxes collected in BC. There are three options (for paying that back):

 

First ... grow the economy at a faster rate than spending to shrink the deficit over a number of years. This is the best option but with all of the negative NDP policies, unfortunately it is not likely.

 

Second ... increase taxes. This would be very negative for quality of life and economic activity but it appears to be the preferred option of the NDP. So far, in 3 years, they have added about 23 new or increased taxes. But given the size of the deficit and the projected increases in spending over the next number of years, the NDP won't be able to erase the deficit with basic taxation. I will speculate on a number of new taxes I suspect they will look at below.

 

Third ... reduce spending. This is not the preferred option as it would impact programs and services, not to mention many families. However, some spending reductions or spending freezes may be required to get on a track to eliminate the deficit.

 

These are all tough choices and require a comprehensive plan, political will and vision. None of these are evident with the current NDP government.

 

My guess is that under a continued NDP government, the NDP will go after capital assets.

 

In other words, they will expand their so called "school tax" which is more properly called an asset tax.

 

They may consider limiting the capital gains you are allowed to make on your home. This is currently tax exempt.

 

They will likely consider another asset tax on high net worth individuals. That doesn't sound bad until you consider that once it is implemented, the "level" at which that asset tax will be applied will come down over time.

 

And the grand daddy of them all?

 

I strongly suspect the NDP will consider an inheritance tax. The baby boomers have accumulated more wealth than any generation in the world’s history. It will be the largest transfer of wealth from one generation to the next.

 

That large, fat target is no doubt in the NDP cross hairs for a future tax.

 

But don't worry. The NDP spin doctors will call any of these new taxes a name which will hide the real intent ... just like they have with so many other things.

 

 

JOHN RUSTAD ... was first elected as the BC Liberal MLA for Nechako Lakes (2005); he previously served as the Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation -- Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations -- and as Parliamentary Secretary for Forestry.

 

He currently serves as the Official Opposition's critic on Forest, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations and was appointed to the Select Standing Committee on Parliamentary Reform, Ethical Conduct, Standing Orders, and Private Bills.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more