Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN RUSTAD -- These are all tough choices and require a comprehensive plan, political will and vision. None of these are evident with the current NDP government

Okay, now that we appear to have COVID-19 under control, how will governments pay for their actions?

 

There is still a risk of a second wave, and more issues to come, but the bill for all of the government support is a sure thing.

 

British Columbia’s deficit?

 

We will hear a start of the telling of that tale later this month from the finance minister. My guess is that BC will be looking at a deficit somewhere between $7 and $15 billion.

 

To put that in perspective, that is possibly more than the combined total amount of income taxes and sales taxes collected in BC. There are three options (for paying that back):

 

First ... grow the economy at a faster rate than spending to shrink the deficit over a number of years. This is the best option but with all of the negative NDP policies, unfortunately it is not likely.

 

Second ... increase taxes. This would be very negative for quality of life and economic activity but it appears to be the preferred option of the NDP. So far, in 3 years, they have added about 23 new or increased taxes. But given the size of the deficit and the projected increases in spending over the next number of years, the NDP won't be able to erase the deficit with basic taxation. I will speculate on a number of new taxes I suspect they will look at below.

 

Third ... reduce spending. This is not the preferred option as it would impact programs and services, not to mention many families. However, some spending reductions or spending freezes may be required to get on a track to eliminate the deficit.

 

These are all tough choices and require a comprehensive plan, political will and vision. None of these are evident with the current NDP government.

 

My guess is that under a continued NDP government, the NDP will go after capital assets.

 

In other words, they will expand their so called "school tax" which is more properly called an asset tax.

 

They may consider limiting the capital gains you are allowed to make on your home. This is currently tax exempt.

 

They will likely consider another asset tax on high net worth individuals. That doesn't sound bad until you consider that once it is implemented, the "level" at which that asset tax will be applied will come down over time.

 

And the grand daddy of them all?

 

I strongly suspect the NDP will consider an inheritance tax. The baby boomers have accumulated more wealth than any generation in the world’s history. It will be the largest transfer of wealth from one generation to the next.

 

That large, fat target is no doubt in the NDP cross hairs for a future tax.

 

But don't worry. The NDP spin doctors will call any of these new taxes a name which will hide the real intent ... just like they have with so many other things.

 

 

JOHN RUSTAD ... was first elected as the BC Liberal MLA for Nechako Lakes (2005); he previously served as the Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation -- Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations -- and as Parliamentary Secretary for Forestry.

 

He currently serves as the Official Opposition's critic on Forest, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations and was appointed to the Select Standing Committee on Parliamentary Reform, Ethical Conduct, Standing Orders, and Private Bills.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...
Post a Comment
Read more

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eby government signs another land-use agreement, as they say one thing and do another, during DRIPA chaos

While promising to fix DRIPA, the Eby government continues to quietly sign binding land-use agreements that fundamentally alter how Crown land is governed in British Columbia. On January 15, 2026, the government signed four ministerial orders advancing the Gwa’ni Land Use Planning Project with the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, amending the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan and changing how more than 166,000 hectares of Crown land can be accessed, developed, and managed. “This is Land Act reform by stealth,” said Critic for Indigenous Relations Scott McInnis. “British Columbians already rejected these changes once. In 2024, public backlash forced the NDP to pull its Land Act amendments. Instead of listening, this government has gone underground, signing individual deals behind closed doors, just like we’ve already seen in places such as Squamish, Teẑtan Biny, and across Northwest BC.” “The Premier admits DRIPA ( the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act) is creating ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more