Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WHY IS THE GOVERNMENT giving taxpayer money to the BC Indigenous Cannabis Business Fund, to go into direct competition with private sector businesses?

 

I noted three things in news stories, in recent days, regarding our Indigenous neighbours, and they had me asking questions that I think at least some of us should be considering.

The first thing was a Global News story from Friday:

First Nations people continue to be disproportionately and devastatingly affected by B.C.’s toxic drug crisis, with 2022 being the deadliest year on record, according to the First Nations Health Authority.

Data released by the FNHA on Friday shows that First Nations people died at 5.9 times the rate of other residents last year, with 373 toxic drug-poisoning deaths in total. It’s a 6.3-per-cent increase from 2021.


The second was a April 20th media announcement from the Assembly of First Nations, and the First Nations Leadership Council (FNLC), which in part stated:

First Nations have inherent rights and jurisdiction to govern the cultivation, processing, sale, and consumption of cannabis in their territories. Despite persistent advocacy, First Nations' distinct rights and unique needs were ignored by colonial governments during the legalization of cannabis.

Five years later, Canada’s legislative framework for cannabis still does not provide appropriate avenues for coordination between jurisdictions or appropriate fiscal relationships that reflect the recognition of First Nations' jurisdiction over cannabis.

First Nations businesses also continue to be challenged by excessive taxation and onerous regulations.

Then today, and perhaps deliberately buried on the weekend so as to have the fewest eyes possible see it, was the third item … a media release from the Mike Farnworth’s Public Safety and Solicitor General’s Ministry, which began by stating:



The Province is providing additional funding to the B.C. Indigenous Cannabis Business Fund (ICBF) to support Indigenous participation in the regulated cannabis industry.

 

Launched in December 2022, the ICBF supports First Nations communities and Indigenous businesses in British Columbia that want to increase their participation in, or join, the regulated cannabis industry.

 

Nearly $2.3 million will be provided to the New Relationship Trust, which is responsible for administering the program, to increase the number of Indigenous businesses that could receive support through the fund. The new, one-time funding is in addition to the original joint contribution of as much as $7.5 million by the Province and the federal government over three years.

Now, let me begin by saying there are thousands upon thousands of British Columbians who are able to enjoy recreational use of cannabis with absolutely no repercussions to their everyday life. For some however, it leads to a lack of ambition, motivation, and in some instances it’s a pathway to harder drugs and addiction – and sadly, as the Global News story stated death from overdoses and a poisoned drug supply.

Which leads me to the media release from the Assembly of First Nations, which to me is like the pot calling the kettle black.  The release states, ‘First Nations have inherent rights and jurisdiction to govern the cultivation, processing, sale, and consumption of cannabis in their territories’.

Not only are they satisfied to grow, and sell, cannabis, to be consumed by the public, including their own people (note the statements regarding addictions and deaths), they want to have their own ‘distinct rights and unique needs’ apply – which I take to mean different than the rules, regulations, and standards applied to everyone else in the cannabis industry.

In other words, the First Nations Leadership Council isn’t content to have the same opportunities as everyone else, they want less taxation … less regulation … and special / unique accommodations.

The FNLC is calling for the issues of jurisdiction, economic development, taxation, revenue sharing, and health and safety for First Nations to be meaningfully addressed in amendments to the Cannabis Act in partnership with First Nations.

But why should they pay less taxes, have less regulation, and enjoy privileges unique to them, that others in the industry are not privy to?

On top of that, monies from the taxpayers of BC -- including the taxes paid by non-Indigenous owned cannabis operators (to the tune of $9.8 million) -- are being used to expand their penetration in the marketplace.

Basically, taxes from non-Indigenous owned cannabis operators, will be used so that Indigenous owned businesses can go into direct competition against them.  What kind of sense is that?

Earlier today, on both Facebook and Twitter, I asked this question:

The BC government is giving even more money to the BC Indigenous Cannabis Business Fund, to support their participation in the regulated cannabis industry.

My question would be, WHY is the government giving ANY taxpayer money at all, when they're in direct competition with private sector businesses?

Can't they stand on their own two feet?

No one responded to my question, and it’s not the first time this has happened when I have questioned things of a similar nature.

Are people afraid to speak up, and questions things of this nature, for fear of repercussions?

Sadly, I think they are … and that, simply, is not right.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more