Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

There can be NO DOUBT from anyone that this BC Liberal government has gone way past governments role in informing British Columbians



What is the governments role in informing British Columbians about important information?  Well according to an official government website, under the heading of Government Communications, they state:

"The Government of British Columbia’s external communications role is to inform the public about government’s programs and services. The ministry-based communications teams focus on leadership through proactive strategic planning and by delivering value-added services."

Why is it then, that more and more, with every passing year, government advertising becomes nothing less than a way for the Party in power to blow its own horn?

And one things for certain, this 'external communications role' certainly does provide 'value added services' -- in the form of free self-promotional advertising for the ruling BC Liberal Party.

On May 24th, on Facebook, I made the statement:

There should be an independent office set up to not vet, but to create, non biased "information" ads. This should be entirely out of the hands of the government and its flunky bureaucrats.

I am NOT alone in thinking this.  This comment was made in February 2013, in an article in the Huffington Post:

The NDP says it has discovered the Liberal government is spending more money on self-promoting ads, with still more ads to come.  During the first Question Period of the new session of B.C. legislature today, NDP leader Adrian Dix said leaked government documents show the ads will cost taxpayers $16.4 million, with the Liberals planning new ads to promote the upcoming budget.  He demanded the government ban partisan advertising, especially in the run-up to the provincial election.

Then last November Business in Vancouver ran an article in which they quoted NDP leader John Horgan saying the BC Liberals are “padding the pockets of their political pals.”

“They spend countless dollars, time and energy withholding information that the public asks for, but when the public’s not looking for information they’ve got mountains of money to spend, to bury us in self-congratulatory promotion.”

That same article also quoted Canadian Taxpayers’ Federation B.C. director Jordan Bateman, who called the new campaign “deja vu all over again,” noting that the next election is coming in 18 months.



Bateman said government advertising programs are another way for the party in power to promote its own brand. “BC Liberals, if nothing else, will always go back to the well,” Bateman said. “It’s something that worked for them before. It looks like they’re going to blow a bunch of our money again.”

And now, just 3 days ago on May 26th, Vaughn Palmer, in the Vancouver Sun had an article in which he wrote about comments from the BC NDP's Gary Holman:

“As we enter into the final year before the May 2017 election, we are once again being deluged by government advertising, the main purpose of which appears to be the promotion of the governing party.”

So, back to my own comment from May 24th:
There should be an independent office set up to not vet, but to create, non biased "information" ads. This should be entirely out of the hands of the government and its flunky bureaucrats.

There can be NO DOUBT from anyone that this BC Liberal government, led by Premier Christy Clark, has gone way past governments role in informing British Columbians about important information. 

Its advertising is highly partisan -- it should be illegal -- and under democratic reform of government, legislation should be crafted to make it so.  Further ... NO government advertising should be permitted that is not vetted first by an independent watch dog. 

Already in recent weeks there has be talk about what the key points may be, in the up-coming election in 2013.  Given that every year millions of dollars are wasted in purely political self congratulatory promotion, we as tax payers must demand it end.

We should demand it not just during the election --- we must demand it now.

In Kamloops I'm Alan Forseth, and I'd be happy to hear your thoughts and comments on this topic.

Comments

  1. Alan, a speller, twice, in your facebook comment, "if should be of."
    Well said but one important point omitted. The government advertising budget manipulates the media into becoming a bunch of parrots. I'm sure that should a newspaper be cranky of critical their share would evaporate. Tax dollars working to stifle debate.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more