Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

There can be NO DOUBT from anyone that this BC Liberal government has gone way past governments role in informing British Columbians



What is the governments role in informing British Columbians about important information?  Well according to an official government website, under the heading of Government Communications, they state:

"The Government of British Columbia’s external communications role is to inform the public about government’s programs and services. The ministry-based communications teams focus on leadership through proactive strategic planning and by delivering value-added services."

Why is it then, that more and more, with every passing year, government advertising becomes nothing less than a way for the Party in power to blow its own horn?

And one things for certain, this 'external communications role' certainly does provide 'value added services' -- in the form of free self-promotional advertising for the ruling BC Liberal Party.

On May 24th, on Facebook, I made the statement:

There should be an independent office set up to not vet, but to create, non biased "information" ads. This should be entirely out of the hands of the government and its flunky bureaucrats.

I am NOT alone in thinking this.  This comment was made in February 2013, in an article in the Huffington Post:

The NDP says it has discovered the Liberal government is spending more money on self-promoting ads, with still more ads to come.  During the first Question Period of the new session of B.C. legislature today, NDP leader Adrian Dix said leaked government documents show the ads will cost taxpayers $16.4 million, with the Liberals planning new ads to promote the upcoming budget.  He demanded the government ban partisan advertising, especially in the run-up to the provincial election.

Then last November Business in Vancouver ran an article in which they quoted NDP leader John Horgan saying the BC Liberals are “padding the pockets of their political pals.”

“They spend countless dollars, time and energy withholding information that the public asks for, but when the public’s not looking for information they’ve got mountains of money to spend, to bury us in self-congratulatory promotion.”

That same article also quoted Canadian Taxpayers’ Federation B.C. director Jordan Bateman, who called the new campaign “deja vu all over again,” noting that the next election is coming in 18 months.



Bateman said government advertising programs are another way for the party in power to promote its own brand. “BC Liberals, if nothing else, will always go back to the well,” Bateman said. “It’s something that worked for them before. It looks like they’re going to blow a bunch of our money again.”

And now, just 3 days ago on May 26th, Vaughn Palmer, in the Vancouver Sun had an article in which he wrote about comments from the BC NDP's Gary Holman:

“As we enter into the final year before the May 2017 election, we are once again being deluged by government advertising, the main purpose of which appears to be the promotion of the governing party.”

So, back to my own comment from May 24th:
There should be an independent office set up to not vet, but to create, non biased "information" ads. This should be entirely out of the hands of the government and its flunky bureaucrats.

There can be NO DOUBT from anyone that this BC Liberal government, led by Premier Christy Clark, has gone way past governments role in informing British Columbians about important information. 

Its advertising is highly partisan -- it should be illegal -- and under democratic reform of government, legislation should be crafted to make it so.  Further ... NO government advertising should be permitted that is not vetted first by an independent watch dog. 

Already in recent weeks there has be talk about what the key points may be, in the up-coming election in 2013.  Given that every year millions of dollars are wasted in purely political self congratulatory promotion, we as tax payers must demand it end.

We should demand it not just during the election --- we must demand it now.

In Kamloops I'm Alan Forseth, and I'd be happy to hear your thoughts and comments on this topic.

Comments

  1. Alan, a speller, twice, in your facebook comment, "if should be of."
    Well said but one important point omitted. The government advertising budget manipulates the media into becoming a bunch of parrots. I'm sure that should a newspaper be cranky of critical their share would evaporate. Tax dollars working to stifle debate.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more