Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

There certainly is a fluctuation ... government revenues fluctuate upwards, while grants to community groups fluctuate downwards!



On Wednesday December 7th, Peter Fassbender (Minister of Community, Sport and Cultural Development) released information about on-going, and up-coming, changes it was making to the Community Gaming Program. He stated:

“I want to thank the Office of the Auditor General for completing their thorough performance audit of our Community Gaming Grants program. I am pleased that the audit found government has a suitable framework in place to administer the program, and we recognize that improvements are needed in some key areas.

“The report outlines 10 recommendations, including the development of a performance management framework, and to evaluate the approach used in assessing applications. Government accepts all 10 recommendations."

A brief summary, and history, of gaming and gambling in British Columbia reminds us that:

  • up to 1969 public gambling / gaming was illegal in Canada
  • then in the 1970s non-profit organizations were able to generate gaming revenue through licenses for bingos and raffles ... as well as sell lottery tickets for a sales commission
  • the B.C. Gaming Commission, responsible for developing provincial gaming policy and regulating and licensing gaming events, was created in 1987
  • over the next 10 years several reviews were completed, and a number of changes put in place.  One of these was the end of charitable gambling licenses for casinos.  Instead, direct access grants were established to replace the lost revenue that organizations had earned from operating charitable casinos. Bingo affiliation grants were combined with direct access grants in 2010 to form the Community Gaming Grants program that exists today

As the government itself states:
In 1999, following the changes to gaming policy, the Government of British Columbia, the BC Bingo Council and the B.C. Association for Charitable Gaming signed a Memorandum of Agreement to govern the parties’ actions until legislation was passed.

The memorandum set out a formula, giving charitable organizations one-third of government net community casino gaming revenue, with a minimum of $125 million indexed to inflation.

So how has that worked out for community groups, across the province?


Well I can tell you that in the past five fiscal years alone (2011/12 to 2015/16) the total government dollars handed out, through the Community Gaming Grants Program, have DECREASED by nearly one hundred and fifty thousand dollars!  That goes hand in hand with the total number of grants, handed out to community groups, also decreasing from 5,260 to 4,981.

Perhaps not a large number, but consider this ... in the same five year fiscal period, total government revenues from gaming (after paying out all expenses) has increased by one-hundred-and-ninety-six million.

The government itself has stated that this program, approved in the provincial government’s annual budget, "has fluctuated over the years".

Well there certainly is a fluctuation ... government revenues fluctuate upwards, while grants to community groups fluctuate downwards!  From information I have sourced from BC government media releases / BC Lottery Corporation, you can see for yourself the correlation between increasing government revenue --- and steadily decreasing grants to community groups and organizations.

First, here are total government revenues from gaming, alongside net income:
                             Revenues ($ Billion)            Net Income ($ Billion)
2015 / 16                3.102                               1.303
2014 / 15                2.904                               1.254 
2013 / 14                2.808                               1.175
2012 / 13                2.732                               1.125
2011 / 12                2.701                               1.107 

Next, let's take a look at the number of grants over the past five fiscal years, along with the total dollar figures of those grants, and then match it up with Net Revenues:
Fiscal Year    Number of Grants   Value of Grants        BCLC Net Income ($)
2015/16        4,981                     $134,836,249           $1.303 billion
2014/15        4,979                     $134,917,800           $1.524 billion
2013/14        5,024                     $134,913,420           $1.175 billion
2012/13        5,037                     $134,916,250           $1.125 billion
2011/12        5,260                     $134,983,942           $1.107 billion


So if you're still with me, the total number of grants made to community groups and organizations has decreased by 279 ... the dollar value of those grants has been reduced by just under $150,000 ... and all the while the net revenues from gaming in BC have increased by $196,000,000.   

For a moment, let's go back to the media release from December 7th:

“We look forward to delivering improvements to the Community Gaming Grants program, including a revitalized focus on customer service, so that not-for-profit organizations throughout the province can continue to benefit from the program’s $135 million in annual funding.”

All I can say is, it's abundantly clear that while the BC Liberal government continues to strip more and more money from British Columbians, through every increasing schemes for new lottery games and casino expansion, the community groups and organizations that should be benefiting, are instead being shortchanged hundreds of millions every year.

Who do you think should be the recipients of the increased revenue?  I know who Christy Clark and the BC Liberal government think should be ... and it's certainly not community non-profit groups and organizations.

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more