Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

There certainly is a fluctuation ... government revenues fluctuate upwards, while grants to community groups fluctuate downwards!



On Wednesday December 7th, Peter Fassbender (Minister of Community, Sport and Cultural Development) released information about on-going, and up-coming, changes it was making to the Community Gaming Program. He stated:

“I want to thank the Office of the Auditor General for completing their thorough performance audit of our Community Gaming Grants program. I am pleased that the audit found government has a suitable framework in place to administer the program, and we recognize that improvements are needed in some key areas.

“The report outlines 10 recommendations, including the development of a performance management framework, and to evaluate the approach used in assessing applications. Government accepts all 10 recommendations."

A brief summary, and history, of gaming and gambling in British Columbia reminds us that:

  • up to 1969 public gambling / gaming was illegal in Canada
  • then in the 1970s non-profit organizations were able to generate gaming revenue through licenses for bingos and raffles ... as well as sell lottery tickets for a sales commission
  • the B.C. Gaming Commission, responsible for developing provincial gaming policy and regulating and licensing gaming events, was created in 1987
  • over the next 10 years several reviews were completed, and a number of changes put in place.  One of these was the end of charitable gambling licenses for casinos.  Instead, direct access grants were established to replace the lost revenue that organizations had earned from operating charitable casinos. Bingo affiliation grants were combined with direct access grants in 2010 to form the Community Gaming Grants program that exists today

As the government itself states:
In 1999, following the changes to gaming policy, the Government of British Columbia, the BC Bingo Council and the B.C. Association for Charitable Gaming signed a Memorandum of Agreement to govern the parties’ actions until legislation was passed.

The memorandum set out a formula, giving charitable organizations one-third of government net community casino gaming revenue, with a minimum of $125 million indexed to inflation.

So how has that worked out for community groups, across the province?


Well I can tell you that in the past five fiscal years alone (2011/12 to 2015/16) the total government dollars handed out, through the Community Gaming Grants Program, have DECREASED by nearly one hundred and fifty thousand dollars!  That goes hand in hand with the total number of grants, handed out to community groups, also decreasing from 5,260 to 4,981.

Perhaps not a large number, but consider this ... in the same five year fiscal period, total government revenues from gaming (after paying out all expenses) has increased by one-hundred-and-ninety-six million.

The government itself has stated that this program, approved in the provincial government’s annual budget, "has fluctuated over the years".

Well there certainly is a fluctuation ... government revenues fluctuate upwards, while grants to community groups fluctuate downwards!  From information I have sourced from BC government media releases / BC Lottery Corporation, you can see for yourself the correlation between increasing government revenue --- and steadily decreasing grants to community groups and organizations.

First, here are total government revenues from gaming, alongside net income:
                             Revenues ($ Billion)            Net Income ($ Billion)
2015 / 16                3.102                               1.303
2014 / 15                2.904                               1.254 
2013 / 14                2.808                               1.175
2012 / 13                2.732                               1.125
2011 / 12                2.701                               1.107 

Next, let's take a look at the number of grants over the past five fiscal years, along with the total dollar figures of those grants, and then match it up with Net Revenues:
Fiscal Year    Number of Grants   Value of Grants        BCLC Net Income ($)
2015/16        4,981                     $134,836,249           $1.303 billion
2014/15        4,979                     $134,917,800           $1.524 billion
2013/14        5,024                     $134,913,420           $1.175 billion
2012/13        5,037                     $134,916,250           $1.125 billion
2011/12        5,260                     $134,983,942           $1.107 billion


So if you're still with me, the total number of grants made to community groups and organizations has decreased by 279 ... the dollar value of those grants has been reduced by just under $150,000 ... and all the while the net revenues from gaming in BC have increased by $196,000,000.   

For a moment, let's go back to the media release from December 7th:

“We look forward to delivering improvements to the Community Gaming Grants program, including a revitalized focus on customer service, so that not-for-profit organizations throughout the province can continue to benefit from the program’s $135 million in annual funding.”

All I can say is, it's abundantly clear that while the BC Liberal government continues to strip more and more money from British Columbians, through every increasing schemes for new lottery games and casino expansion, the community groups and organizations that should be benefiting, are instead being shortchanged hundreds of millions every year.

Who do you think should be the recipients of the increased revenue?  I know who Christy Clark and the BC Liberal government think should be ... and it's certainly not community non-profit groups and organizations.

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more