Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Global human rights at a crossroads


Powerful nations are undermining international law, leading to global injustice and the erosion of human rights enforcement ~~ by Gerry Chidiac
 

The years between 1945 and 1949 were a golden age for human rights. As people reflected on the Holocaust and the devastation of the Second World War, they recognized the importance of a system of international law to prevent such catastrophes from happening again. This period saw the adoption of the Genocide Convention and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, along with updates to the Geneva Conventions defining war crimes.

It soon became clear, however, that powerful countries and individuals had no intention of being held accountable to these ideals. They continued to act with impunity, and millions of people were killed.

There was another moment of hope as the Cold War ended in the early 1990s. But again, world leaders—especially those in the so-called First World—failed to seize the opportunity to build a peaceful world. Instead, they fueled further death and destruction, and no force on Earth could consistently hold them accountable.

Nonetheless, efforts were made to build a system of accountability to enforce international law. While the International Court of Justice had long been established to hold states accountable, there was no way to try individuals until the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in the early 2000s.

Many powerful countries—including the United States, Russia and China—refused to ratify the agreement that established the ICC. As a result, their citizens are not bound by its rulings unless they visit a signatory nation, such as Canada. Even worse, the U.S. government has announced that it will not only ignore ICC rulings but will also impose sanctions on ICC officials involved in cases against its nationals or allies.

Anyone who has ever played sports knows that if the rules of the game are not fairly enforced, chaos ensues.

Many fail to recognize that the U.S. is not the country it used to be. American military specialist and Trump supporter Col. Douglas Macgregor has pointed out:

“If you go back through history and you look at leaders of great powers, much like Donald Trump, they have a bad habit of overestimating their own capabilities, underestimating the capabilities of other potential adversaries and exceeding the limits of their power. Right now, that is exactly what President Trump is doing. He is dangerously exceeding the limits of American power and influence, and he is doing it in a way that is very harmful to us.”

Today, the world looks like a collection of nations acting without regard for consequences. Unlike children, however, many of these countries have arsenals of deadly weapons they seem willing to use. If they choose to violate international law, enforcement is inconsistent at best. This reality weakens the global order, increasing instability. In war, there are no predictable outcomes.

It is perfectly legitimate to criticize the current system of international law, but rejecting it entirely is extremely dangerous. No legal system is perfect, but laws evolve as they are challenged in court. Every human rights advocate understands this.

Why, then, does the U.S. so strongly object to the ICC? Why don’t figures like Benjamin Netanyahu and Vladimir Putin—both facing ICC arrest warrants—turn themselves over to the court? If they are innocent, they have nothing to fear.

With the breakdown of the international balance of power and the real potential for global chaos, respect for the rule of law is our best assurance of safety for all people, in all countries. None of us is free until we are all free, and none of us is safe until we are all safe.

Now more than ever, we must recognize the importance of law. It does not matter who our ally is—nothing is more important than moral consistency in the application of our laws, especially when alleged violations relate to war crimes, genocide and other crimes against humanity.


Gerry Chidiac specializes in languages and genocide studies and works with at-risk students. He received an award from the Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre for excellence in teaching about the Holocaust.

© Troy Media

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more