Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Global human rights at a crossroads


Powerful nations are undermining international law, leading to global injustice and the erosion of human rights enforcement ~~ by Gerry Chidiac
 

The years between 1945 and 1949 were a golden age for human rights. As people reflected on the Holocaust and the devastation of the Second World War, they recognized the importance of a system of international law to prevent such catastrophes from happening again. This period saw the adoption of the Genocide Convention and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, along with updates to the Geneva Conventions defining war crimes.

It soon became clear, however, that powerful countries and individuals had no intention of being held accountable to these ideals. They continued to act with impunity, and millions of people were killed.

There was another moment of hope as the Cold War ended in the early 1990s. But again, world leaders—especially those in the so-called First World—failed to seize the opportunity to build a peaceful world. Instead, they fueled further death and destruction, and no force on Earth could consistently hold them accountable.

Nonetheless, efforts were made to build a system of accountability to enforce international law. While the International Court of Justice had long been established to hold states accountable, there was no way to try individuals until the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in the early 2000s.

Many powerful countries—including the United States, Russia and China—refused to ratify the agreement that established the ICC. As a result, their citizens are not bound by its rulings unless they visit a signatory nation, such as Canada. Even worse, the U.S. government has announced that it will not only ignore ICC rulings but will also impose sanctions on ICC officials involved in cases against its nationals or allies.

Anyone who has ever played sports knows that if the rules of the game are not fairly enforced, chaos ensues.

Many fail to recognize that the U.S. is not the country it used to be. American military specialist and Trump supporter Col. Douglas Macgregor has pointed out:

If you go back through history and you look at leaders of great powers, much like Donald Trump, they have a bad habit of overestimating their own capabilities, underestimating the capabilities of other potential adversaries and exceeding the limits of their power. Right now, that is exactly what President Trump is doing. He is dangerously exceeding the limits of American power and influence, and he is doing it in a way that is very harmful to us.”

Today, the world looks like a collection of nations acting without regard for consequences. Unlike children, however, many of these countries have arsenals of deadly weapons they seem willing to use. If they choose to violate international law, enforcement is inconsistent at best. This reality weakens the global order, increasing instability. In war, there are no predictable outcomes.

It is perfectly legitimate to criticize the current system of international law, but rejecting it entirely is extremely dangerous. No legal system is perfect, but laws evolve as they are challenged in court. Every human rights advocate understands this.

Why, then, does the U.S. so strongly object to the ICC? Why don’t figures like Benjamin Netanyahu and Vladimir Putin—both facing ICC arrest warrants—turn themselves over to the court? If they are innocent, they have nothing to fear.

With the breakdown of the international balance of power and the real potential for global chaos, respect for the rule of law is our best assurance of safety for all people, in all countries. None of us is free until we are all free, and none of us is safe until we are all safe.

Now more than ever, we must recognize the importance of law. It does not matter who our ally is—nothing is more important than moral consistency in the application of our laws, especially when alleged violations relate to war crimes, genocide and other crimes against humanity.


Gerry Chidiac specializes in languages and genocide studies and works with at-risk students. He received an award from the Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre for excellence in teaching about the Holocaust.

© Troy Media

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more