Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Global human rights at a crossroads


Powerful nations are undermining international law, leading to global injustice and the erosion of human rights enforcement ~~ by Gerry Chidiac
 

The years between 1945 and 1949 were a golden age for human rights. As people reflected on the Holocaust and the devastation of the Second World War, they recognized the importance of a system of international law to prevent such catastrophes from happening again. This period saw the adoption of the Genocide Convention and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, along with updates to the Geneva Conventions defining war crimes.

It soon became clear, however, that powerful countries and individuals had no intention of being held accountable to these ideals. They continued to act with impunity, and millions of people were killed.

There was another moment of hope as the Cold War ended in the early 1990s. But again, world leaders—especially those in the so-called First World—failed to seize the opportunity to build a peaceful world. Instead, they fueled further death and destruction, and no force on Earth could consistently hold them accountable.

Nonetheless, efforts were made to build a system of accountability to enforce international law. While the International Court of Justice had long been established to hold states accountable, there was no way to try individuals until the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in the early 2000s.

Many powerful countries—including the United States, Russia and China—refused to ratify the agreement that established the ICC. As a result, their citizens are not bound by its rulings unless they visit a signatory nation, such as Canada. Even worse, the U.S. government has announced that it will not only ignore ICC rulings but will also impose sanctions on ICC officials involved in cases against its nationals or allies.

Anyone who has ever played sports knows that if the rules of the game are not fairly enforced, chaos ensues.

Many fail to recognize that the U.S. is not the country it used to be. American military specialist and Trump supporter Col. Douglas Macgregor has pointed out:

If you go back through history and you look at leaders of great powers, much like Donald Trump, they have a bad habit of overestimating their own capabilities, underestimating the capabilities of other potential adversaries and exceeding the limits of their power. Right now, that is exactly what President Trump is doing. He is dangerously exceeding the limits of American power and influence, and he is doing it in a way that is very harmful to us.”

Today, the world looks like a collection of nations acting without regard for consequences. Unlike children, however, many of these countries have arsenals of deadly weapons they seem willing to use. If they choose to violate international law, enforcement is inconsistent at best. This reality weakens the global order, increasing instability. In war, there are no predictable outcomes.

It is perfectly legitimate to criticize the current system of international law, but rejecting it entirely is extremely dangerous. No legal system is perfect, but laws evolve as they are challenged in court. Every human rights advocate understands this.

Why, then, does the U.S. so strongly object to the ICC? Why don’t figures like Benjamin Netanyahu and Vladimir Putin—both facing ICC arrest warrants—turn themselves over to the court? If they are innocent, they have nothing to fear.

With the breakdown of the international balance of power and the real potential for global chaos, respect for the rule of law is our best assurance of safety for all people, in all countries. None of us is free until we are all free, and none of us is safe until we are all safe.

Now more than ever, we must recognize the importance of law. It does not matter who our ally is—nothing is more important than moral consistency in the application of our laws, especially when alleged violations relate to war crimes, genocide and other crimes against humanity.


Gerry Chidiac specializes in languages and genocide studies and works with at-risk students. He received an award from the Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre for excellence in teaching about the Holocaust.

© Troy Media

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more