Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Global human rights at a crossroads


Powerful nations are undermining international law, leading to global injustice and the erosion of human rights enforcement ~~ by Gerry Chidiac
 

The years between 1945 and 1949 were a golden age for human rights. As people reflected on the Holocaust and the devastation of the Second World War, they recognized the importance of a system of international law to prevent such catastrophes from happening again. This period saw the adoption of the Genocide Convention and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, along with updates to the Geneva Conventions defining war crimes.

It soon became clear, however, that powerful countries and individuals had no intention of being held accountable to these ideals. They continued to act with impunity, and millions of people were killed.

There was another moment of hope as the Cold War ended in the early 1990s. But again, world leaders—especially those in the so-called First World—failed to seize the opportunity to build a peaceful world. Instead, they fueled further death and destruction, and no force on Earth could consistently hold them accountable.

Nonetheless, efforts were made to build a system of accountability to enforce international law. While the International Court of Justice had long been established to hold states accountable, there was no way to try individuals until the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in the early 2000s.

Many powerful countries—including the United States, Russia and China—refused to ratify the agreement that established the ICC. As a result, their citizens are not bound by its rulings unless they visit a signatory nation, such as Canada. Even worse, the U.S. government has announced that it will not only ignore ICC rulings but will also impose sanctions on ICC officials involved in cases against its nationals or allies.

Anyone who has ever played sports knows that if the rules of the game are not fairly enforced, chaos ensues.

Many fail to recognize that the U.S. is not the country it used to be. American military specialist and Trump supporter Col. Douglas Macgregor has pointed out:

If you go back through history and you look at leaders of great powers, much like Donald Trump, they have a bad habit of overestimating their own capabilities, underestimating the capabilities of other potential adversaries and exceeding the limits of their power. Right now, that is exactly what President Trump is doing. He is dangerously exceeding the limits of American power and influence, and he is doing it in a way that is very harmful to us.”

Today, the world looks like a collection of nations acting without regard for consequences. Unlike children, however, many of these countries have arsenals of deadly weapons they seem willing to use. If they choose to violate international law, enforcement is inconsistent at best. This reality weakens the global order, increasing instability. In war, there are no predictable outcomes.

It is perfectly legitimate to criticize the current system of international law, but rejecting it entirely is extremely dangerous. No legal system is perfect, but laws evolve as they are challenged in court. Every human rights advocate understands this.

Why, then, does the U.S. so strongly object to the ICC? Why don’t figures like Benjamin Netanyahu and Vladimir Putin—both facing ICC arrest warrants—turn themselves over to the court? If they are innocent, they have nothing to fear.

With the breakdown of the international balance of power and the real potential for global chaos, respect for the rule of law is our best assurance of safety for all people, in all countries. None of us is free until we are all free, and none of us is safe until we are all safe.

Now more than ever, we must recognize the importance of law. It does not matter who our ally is—nothing is more important than moral consistency in the application of our laws, especially when alleged violations relate to war crimes, genocide and other crimes against humanity.


Gerry Chidiac specializes in languages and genocide studies and works with at-risk students. He received an award from the Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre for excellence in teaching about the Holocaust.

© Troy Media

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more