Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Global human rights at a crossroads


Powerful nations are undermining international law, leading to global injustice and the erosion of human rights enforcement ~~ by Gerry Chidiac
 

The years between 1945 and 1949 were a golden age for human rights. As people reflected on the Holocaust and the devastation of the Second World War, they recognized the importance of a system of international law to prevent such catastrophes from happening again. This period saw the adoption of the Genocide Convention and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, along with updates to the Geneva Conventions defining war crimes.

It soon became clear, however, that powerful countries and individuals had no intention of being held accountable to these ideals. They continued to act with impunity, and millions of people were killed.

There was another moment of hope as the Cold War ended in the early 1990s. But again, world leaders—especially those in the so-called First World—failed to seize the opportunity to build a peaceful world. Instead, they fueled further death and destruction, and no force on Earth could consistently hold them accountable.

Nonetheless, efforts were made to build a system of accountability to enforce international law. While the International Court of Justice had long been established to hold states accountable, there was no way to try individuals until the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in the early 2000s.

Many powerful countries—including the United States, Russia and China—refused to ratify the agreement that established the ICC. As a result, their citizens are not bound by its rulings unless they visit a signatory nation, such as Canada. Even worse, the U.S. government has announced that it will not only ignore ICC rulings but will also impose sanctions on ICC officials involved in cases against its nationals or allies.

Anyone who has ever played sports knows that if the rules of the game are not fairly enforced, chaos ensues.

Many fail to recognize that the U.S. is not the country it used to be. American military specialist and Trump supporter Col. Douglas Macgregor has pointed out:

If you go back through history and you look at leaders of great powers, much like Donald Trump, they have a bad habit of overestimating their own capabilities, underestimating the capabilities of other potential adversaries and exceeding the limits of their power. Right now, that is exactly what President Trump is doing. He is dangerously exceeding the limits of American power and influence, and he is doing it in a way that is very harmful to us.”

Today, the world looks like a collection of nations acting without regard for consequences. Unlike children, however, many of these countries have arsenals of deadly weapons they seem willing to use. If they choose to violate international law, enforcement is inconsistent at best. This reality weakens the global order, increasing instability. In war, there are no predictable outcomes.

It is perfectly legitimate to criticize the current system of international law, but rejecting it entirely is extremely dangerous. No legal system is perfect, but laws evolve as they are challenged in court. Every human rights advocate understands this.

Why, then, does the U.S. so strongly object to the ICC? Why don’t figures like Benjamin Netanyahu and Vladimir Putin—both facing ICC arrest warrants—turn themselves over to the court? If they are innocent, they have nothing to fear.

With the breakdown of the international balance of power and the real potential for global chaos, respect for the rule of law is our best assurance of safety for all people, in all countries. None of us is free until we are all free, and none of us is safe until we are all safe.

Now more than ever, we must recognize the importance of law. It does not matter who our ally is—nothing is more important than moral consistency in the application of our laws, especially when alleged violations relate to war crimes, genocide and other crimes against humanity.


Gerry Chidiac specializes in languages and genocide studies and works with at-risk students. He received an award from the Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre for excellence in teaching about the Holocaust.

© Troy Media

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more