Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL: That big Liberal tax cut comes up short


Our leaders failed .... but we failed first. This tax cut is evidence of just how irresponsible voters in this country are
 
Mark Carney and the Liberals stole their tax cut idea from the Poilievre Conservatives. That's a fact one can carve in stone and take to the bank. It was a bad idea when the Conservatives floated it. It is just a bad idea now that Mark Carney is making it a reality.

First, let's just go over the $280 number. That's for the average Canadian family which likely means you. If you assume 24 pay periods in a year, pay day in lay terms that's $11.67 each pay day. If you're desperate for $11.67 every couple of weeks your financial situation is dire.

Second, an additional $11.67 every couple of weeks isn't going to change anyone's spending habits. It will not stimulate the economy. That number is tiny.

Third, this tax cut is being paid for by borrowing yet more money. The government is metaphorically taking a cash advance on its credit card and giving that cash to us.

That means taxpayers have to pay that cash back with interest each and every year. Thinking about it like that, that's not a tax cut. That's just a tax deferral. With interest.

So what should the government have done instead? Regardless if the government were Liberal or Conservative or NDP what would have been a better policy?

I think the better policy would have been to do nothing and not borrow money to pay for a tax cut. This tax cut will cost the government about $5.5 billion a year and likely more. By not spending that money the government would have been $5.5 billion closer to balancing the budget.

Why is balancing the budget better?

This is a question everyone that studies economics knows the answer to: when a government balances the budget year over year the debt shrinks in relation to the size of economy. As that happens debt service charges become smaller in proportion. So as government revenues increase they can be used for things other than servicing the debt like health care, the environment, the military, and other things.

The 2025 election was a statement of just how big a failure Canadian leaders and the voters have become. People chose badly, but none of the parties were offering a responsible vision either. Not one political party offered a platform of planning for long term fiscal sustainability. I blame the voters because voters wanted goodies not plans.

Our leaders failed .... but we failed first. This tax cut is evidence of just how irresponsible voters in this country are.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more