Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL: That big Liberal tax cut comes up short


Our leaders failed .... but we failed first. This tax cut is evidence of just how irresponsible voters in this country are
 
Mark Carney and the Liberals stole their tax cut idea from the Poilievre Conservatives. That's a fact one can carve in stone and take to the bank. It was a bad idea when the Conservatives floated it. It is just a bad idea now that Mark Carney is making it a reality.

First, let's just go over the $280 number. That's for the average Canadian family which likely means you. If you assume 24 pay periods in a year, pay day in lay terms that's $11.67 each pay day. If you're desperate for $11.67 every couple of weeks your financial situation is dire.

Second, an additional $11.67 every couple of weeks isn't going to change anyone's spending habits. It will not stimulate the economy. That number is tiny.

Third, this tax cut is being paid for by borrowing yet more money. The government is metaphorically taking a cash advance on its credit card and giving that cash to us.

That means taxpayers have to pay that cash back with interest each and every year. Thinking about it like that, that's not a tax cut. That's just a tax deferral. With interest.

So what should the government have done instead? Regardless if the government were Liberal or Conservative or NDP what would have been a better policy?

I think the better policy would have been to do nothing and not borrow money to pay for a tax cut. This tax cut will cost the government about $5.5 billion a year and likely more. By not spending that money the government would have been $5.5 billion closer to balancing the budget.

Why is balancing the budget better?

This is a question everyone that studies economics knows the answer to: when a government balances the budget year over year the debt shrinks in relation to the size of economy. As that happens debt service charges become smaller in proportion. So as government revenues increase they can be used for things other than servicing the debt like health care, the environment, the military, and other things.

The 2025 election was a statement of just how big a failure Canadian leaders and the voters have become. People chose badly, but none of the parties were offering a responsible vision either. Not one political party offered a platform of planning for long term fiscal sustainability. I blame the voters because voters wanted goodies not plans.

Our leaders failed .... but we failed first. This tax cut is evidence of just how irresponsible voters in this country are.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more