Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Tossing the core principles religious teachings, such as the commandments and deadly sins, in the trash bin was unwise


Why incels are a 'real and present threat' for Canadians
The Fifth Estate / CBC News ~~ Jan 27, 2019

(On Jan 19th, 2019) a Colorado man named Christopher Cleary took to social media and laid out the plan for an attack that was coming together in his mind ... police tracked him down – en route to a women's march in Utah — before he was able to carry out his plan.

But it doesn't always work out that way when men who identify themselves as incels ... incels are an online brotherhood of men who say they are unsuccessful in their romantic attempts with women.

A recent count by The Fifth Estate shows at least 60,000 people are active in the three main public incel forums online.

CLICK HERE to read the full story 


The Fifth Estate has nosedived into tabloid sensationalism.

The principle architects of our brave new world, primarily college and university professors, are distraught at the results of their experiments and screaming for protection.

Unfortunately however, the victims of incel revenge will be innocents. We are the reaping undesirable results.

Tossing the core principles religious teachings, such as the commandments and deadly sins, in the trash bin was unwise – teachings whose principles are not exclusively Judeo / Christian. They appear in several different religions without fundamental differences. Sex education for prepubescent school students is unwise. It creates expectations that children are emotionally and mentally unequipped to handle.

We stopped teaching the fundamentals of compassion, decorum, ethics, etiquette, honesty, honour and personal responsibility ... and now wonder why we have a more brutish and uncaring society.

The lack of underlying personal principles is responsible for the domestic violence in our society.

Our focus on popularity, as the key to happiness and success, is inane. The result is that people who don’t achieve popularity feel abused and resentful. From there it is not a complex journey from resentment -- to rage -- to revenge.


The Fifth Estate / CBC article provides no insights into why some people are shut out of the mainstream.

They are victims of social standards and values they don’t understand; the key is education. We have a growing disconnect between what our education system is producing and real-world consequences. Incels is only one tiny aspect. Counting up 60,000 participants on incel web sites sounds ominous until you find out that is less then one-fifth of one percent of the males in North America.     

Not one contributor to this piece attempts to tackle the issue of how we can bridge the gap and bring incels into the mainstream, or how we can adjust social standards to prevent the creation and isolation of people in the future. Instead, they label incels as ‘right-wing’ or ‘extremists’ as if the issue is political - or that the labeling absolves them of responsibility.

Neither is true.

The architects of our brave new society created a problem and are now trying to avoid responsibility, by presenting it as a new problem to solve.

It is not new, and it is their responsibility. 


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more