Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: While we can express our displeasure, or ask for leniency, our standards do not apply. Government virtue signalling is a useless exercise because totalitarian states are not listening


Canadian Robert Schellenberg Sentenced to Death in China in Drug-Smuggling Case
Jessica Chin ~~ HuffPost ~~ 01/14/2019 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Canada will do everything it can to intervene on behalf of a Canadian sentenced to death in China. ... "I will say it is of extreme concern to us as a government— as it should be to all our international friends and allies— that China has chosen to begin to arbitrarily apply death penalty as in this case facing a Canadian".

In December, Chinese state media raised Schellenberg's case, who at that point was sentenced to 15 years in prison. He was originally detained in China in 2014, with a trial that began in 2016. He was sentenced in 2018.  Courts heard an appeal of that conviction on Dec. 29, 2018, and ordered a retrial for Monday, raising the possibility of a harsher sentence.

Schellenberg was again found guilty of taking part in an international drug-smuggling ring, according to the Wall Street Journal. Drug smuggling is an offence punishable by death in China.

CLICK HERE for full story: 

Robert Schellenberg sentenced to
death, in China, for drug trafficking
Who turned the Mad Hatter loose in 2019, because honestly this situation is both surreal and bizarre?

What we know is that Schellenberg was convicted of conspiring to smuggle drugs in China. But we must keep in mind that China is a massive exporter of illegal drugs ... therefore we can probably assume her government does not take kindly to competition.

The law is not uniformly applied ... exporters with the right political connections are safe ... foreign dealers are not likely to fare well ... the penalty for drug dealing is death.

China’s decision to put Schellenberg to death is arbitrary. Every decision it makes is arbitrary and political. There is no fair, honest and independent justice system in China. Given China is ruled by a totalitarian communist regime, an accused person is completely at the mercy of the government.   


We in Canada don’t sentence drug dealers to death; perhaps if we did however, we wouldn’t be tripping over the bodies of accidental overdose victims. Drug dealing is not a minor crime, especially in a number of countries around the world.

If you deal in or use illegal drugs, don’t go to Bahrain, Bangladesh, China, Cuba, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Malesia, Myanmar, Oman, North Korea, Pakistan, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, South Korea, Sudan, Syria, Taiwan, Thailand, Viet Nam or Yemen amongst others.

There are parts of our world overrun by bandits, corrupt governments, corrupt police agencies, kidnappers, militias, rebels and terrorists. Common sense tells us to avoid those places.

"As a government, we actually strengthened the policy that requires the Canadian government to always intercede on behalf of a Canadian facing the death penalty anywhere in the world. We will continue to do that as we have in this case", said Justin Trudeau.

STILL, while we can express our displeasure, or ask for leniency, we have no means of enforcing a change in sentence. Travellers to a foreign nation are subject to its laws, and whatever passes for its justice system. Our standards do not apply, and government virtue signalling is a useless exercise. Totalitarian states are not listening.

Our government’s preoccupation with rehabilitating foreign nations is not what it was elected to do, and its efforts are not welcomed by other nations.   Meantime, our Indian Act infringes heavily on aboriginal people’s rights and freedoms ... and that IS something our government can do something about.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more